Cited by 9Spam and Phishing DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Detection of Inappropriate Tweets Linked to Fake Accounts on Twitter

Open access
Alsubaei, Faisal S.·2023·Applied Sciences

Abstract

It is obvious that one of the most significant challenges posed by Twitter is the proliferation of fraudulent and fake accounts, as well as the challenge of identifying these accounts. As a result, the primary focus of this paper is on the identification of fraudulent accounts, fake information, and fake accounts on Twitter, in addition to the flow of content that these accounts post. The research utilized a design science methodological approach and developed a bot account referred to as “Fake Account Detector” that assists with the detection of inappropriate posts that are associated with fake accounts. To develop this detector, previously published tweets serve as the datasets for the training session. This data comes from Twitter and are obtained through the REST API. The technique of machine learning with random forest (RF) is then used to train the data. The high levels of accuracy (99.4%) obtained from the RF detection results served as the foundation for the development of the bot account. This detector tool, developed using this model, can be utilized by individuals, businesses, and government agencies to assist in the detection and prevention of Twitter problems related to fake news and fake accounts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app13053013

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media platforms have implemented authentication systems and detection algorithms, but the problem of fake accounts remains persistent.

    “To address these issue, social media platforms have implemented various measures, including authentication systems for prominence users and algorithms designed to detect and remove suspicious accounts. However, this problem remains persistent, and the ongoing growth of new methods to identify and block fraudulent accounts remains a urgency for both researchers and platform operatives19.”

    From Instagram fake profile detection using an ensemble learning method (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says Twitter has made numerous attempts to enforce its policy against fake accounts, yet users continue to evade those efforts. The paper also develops a fake-account detector, but it does not establish that social media platforms have implemented authentication systems for prominent users or algorithms to detect and remove suspicious accounts. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dmitrienko, A.; Liebchen, C.; Rossow, C.; Sadeghi, A.-R. On the (In)Security of Mobile Two-Factor Authentication. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 365-383. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Albahar, M.A. Detecting Fraudulent Twitter Profiles: A Model for Fraud Detection in Online Social Networks. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control. 2019, 15, 1629-1639. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsubaei, F. S.
Affiliations
University of Jeddah (SA)
Corresponding author
Alsubaei, Faisal S.
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-26
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
3013
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322503172
Cited by
9
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (UJ-22-DR-70)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
fake account detection, bot detection, Twitter, fake news, random forest, social media abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review