Cited by 44Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AITechnology's Impact on Media

The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: Theoretical Framework

Open access
Costa, Carlos J., Aparicio, Manuela, Aparicio, Sofia, Aparicio, Joao Tiago·2024·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The democratization of artificial intelligence (AI) involves extending access to AI technologies beyond specialized technical experts to a broader spectrum of users and organizations. This paper provides an overview of AI’s historical context and evolution, emphasizing the concept of AI democratization. Current trends shaping AI democratization are analyzed, highlighting key challenges and opportunities. The roles of pivotal stakeholders, including technology firms, educational entities, and governmental bodies, are examined in facilitating widespread AI adoption. A comprehensive framework elucidates the components, drivers, challenges, and strategies crucial to AI democratization. This framework is subsequently applied in the context of scenario analyses, offering insights into potential outcomes and implications. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research directions and strategic actions to foster responsible and inclusive AI development globally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app14188236

Cites

37 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 3 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Madhuri, T.; Sowjanya, P. Microsoft Azure v/s Amazon AWS Cloud Services: A Comparative Study. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2016, 5, 3904-3908.
  2. ACM. The Code Affirms an Obligation of Computing Professionals to Use Their Skills for the Benefit of Society. Available online: https://www.acm.org/diversity-inclusion/code-of-ethics (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  3. IEEE. GET Program for AI Ethics and Governance Standards, GET. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/browse/ standards/get-program/page/series?id=93 (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  4. Soni, V. Impact of Generative AI on Small and Medium Enterprises' Revenue Growth: The Moderating Role of Human, Technological, and Market Factors. Rev. Contemp. Bus. Anal. 2023, 6, 133-153.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, C. J., Aparicio, M., Aparicio, S., & Aparicio, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1070-312 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Corresponding author
Costa, Carlos J.
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-12
Volume
14
Issue
18
Pages
8236
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402482276
Cited by
44
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. (Portugal) (ADVANCE-CSG UIDB/04521/2020, UIDB/04152/2020, UI/BD/153587/2022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology's Impact on Media
Keywords
democratization of AI, artificial intelligence adoption, technology companies, responsible AI, inclusive AI, scenario analysis, theoretical framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review