Cited by 16Fault Detection and Control SystemsMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

DeepESN neural networks for industrial predictive maintenance through anomaly detection from production energy Data

Open access
Bonci, Andrea, Fredianelli, Luca, Kermenov, Renat, Longarini, Lorenzo, Longhi, Sauro, Pompei, Geremia, Prist, Mariorosario, Verdini, Carlo·2024·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Optimizing energy consumption is an important aspect of industrial competitiveness, as it directly impacts operational efficiency, cost reduction, and sustainability goals. In this context, anomaly detection (AD) becomes a valuable methodology, as it supports maintenance activities in the manufacturing sector, allowing for early intervention to prevent energy waste and maintain optimal performance. Here, an AD-based method is proposed and studied to support energy-saving predictive maintenance of production lines using time series acquired directly from the field. This paper proposes a deep echo state network (DeepESN)-based method for anomaly detection by analyzing energy consumption data sets from production lines. Compared with traditional prediction methods, such as recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory (LSTM), although both models show similar time series trends, the DeepESN-based method studied here appears to have some advantages, such as timelier error detection and higher prediction accuracy. In addition, the DeepESN-based method has been shown to be more accurate in predicting the occurrence of failure. The proposed solution has been extensively tested in a real-world pilot case consisting of an automated metal filter production line equipped with industrial smart meters to acquire energy data during production phases; the time series, composed of 88 variables associated with energy parameters, was then processed using the techniques introduced earlier. The results show that our method enables earlier error detection and achieves higher prediction accuracy when running on an edge device.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app14198686

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning shines in predictive maintenance, using sensor data to detect subtle patterns and predict equipment failures before they happen.

    “Deep learning shines in predictive maintenance, using sensor data to detect subtle patterns and predict equipment failures before they happen [52].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chang, Q.; Xiao, G.; Biller, S.; Li, L. Energy saving opportunity analysis of automotive serial production systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2012, 63, 334-342.
  2. Goodfellow, I.J.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; Bengio, Y. Generative adversarial networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2014, 27. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Akcay, S.; Atapour-Abarghouei, A.; Breckon, T.P. Ganomaly: Semisupervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia, 2-6 December 2018; pp. 622-637.
  4. Hecht-Nielsen, R. Theory of the Backpropagation Neural Network; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonci, A., Fredianelli, L., Kermenov, R., Longarini, L., Longhi, S., Pompei, G., Prist, M., & Verdini, C.
Affiliations
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Syncode Scarl, 93900 Fermo, Italy
Corresponding author
Bonci, Andrea
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-26
Volume
14
Issue
19
Pages
8686
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402860901
Cited by
16
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
the European project Horizon Europe “EDIH4Marche” (European Digital Innovation Hub for Marche), Call DIGITAL-2021-EDIH-01 (101084027)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
deep echo state network, anomaly detection, predictive maintenance, industrial energy consumption, failure prediction, energy conservation, edge computing, time series analysis, LSTM comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review