Cited by 15Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsRecommender Systems and Techniques

Adaptive Learning in AI Agents for the Metaverse: The ALMAA Framework

Open access
Xia, Yina, Shin, Seong-Yoon, Lee, Hyun-Ae·2024·Applied Sciences

Abstract

This study investigates the adaptability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents in the Metaverse, focusing on their ability to enhance responsiveness, decision-making, and engagement through the proposed Adaptive Learning Model for AI Agents (ALMAA) framework. The research does not introduce new interventions to existing platforms like Epic Games or AltspaceVR but instead analyzes how their operations align with adaptive learning principles. By examining these platforms, the study demonstrates the alignment between real-world practices and theoretical constructs, offering insights into how adaptive AI systems operate in dynamic virtual environments. Case observations highlight key metrics such as user interaction efficiency, contextual decision accuracy, and predictive engagement strategies. The data, derived from detailed user interaction logs and feedback reports, underscore the practical application of adaptive learning in optimizing user satisfaction and system performance. Statistical analyses reveal notable gains in response speed, predictive precision, and user engagement, validating the theoretical framework’s relevance. This paper positions the ALMAA framework as a critical lens for understanding and analyzing adaptive AI in virtual settings. It emphasizes theoretical exploration rather than experimental application, providing a foundation for future research into scalable, user-centered AI systems tailored for the Metaverse’s evolving demands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app142311410

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ALMAA demonstrates practical application of logging in virtual environments, utilizing detailed user interaction logs and feedback reports to optimize user satisfaction and system performance.

    “The ALMAA demonstrates practical application of logging in virtual environments, utilizing detailed user interaction logs and feedback reports to optimize user satisfaction and system performance [74].”

    From Investigating the Impact of Dark Patterns on LLM-Based Web Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [74]

    Section 4.4 (page unavailable) says the study analyzed user interaction logs, feedback reports, and performance metrics from virtual platforms. Section 7.1 (page unavailable) reports improved user satisfaction and operational efficiency. The paper presents the logs as data for evaluating ALMAA, not as a demonstrated mechanism used to optimize those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent research has highlighted the importance of comprehensive logging systems for AI agents across various domains.

    “Recent research has highlighted the importance of comprehensive logging systems for AI agents across various domains.”

    From Investigating the Impact of Dark Patterns on LLM-Based Web Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [74]

    Section 4.4 (page unavailable) says the authors used extensive user-interaction logs as observational data. It does not discuss the importance of comprehensive logging systems for AI agents across domains. Searches for logging systems and their importance found no passage addressing that broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Theng, Y.L.; Lee, J.W.; Patinadan, P.V.; Foo, S.S. The use of videogames, gamification, and virtual environments in the self- management of diabetes: A systematic review of evidence. Games Health J. 2015, 4, 352-361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  2. Aydin, Ö. Google Bard generated literature review: Metaverse. J. AI 2023, 7, 1-14. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Hu, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y. Practical prospect and future approach of digital transformation of scientific journals under metaverse situation. Chin. J. Sci. Tech. Period. 2023, 34, 1020. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Ahn, S.J.; Bostick, J.; Ogle, E.; Nowak, K.L.; McGillicuddy, K.T.; Bailenson, J.N. Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2016, 21, 399-419. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Falloon, G. Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2010, 41, 108-122. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Du, H.; Wang, J.; Niyato, D.; Kang, J.; Xiong, Z.; Kim, D.I. AI-generated incentive mechanism and full-duplex semantic communications for information sharing. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2023, 9, 102-112. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Han, Q.L. The era of quality and metaverse. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2023, 10, 1-2. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Charles, D.; Charles, T.; McNeill, M.; Bustard, D.; Black, M. Game-based feedback for educational multi-user virtual environments. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2011, 42, 638-654. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Manser Payne, E.H.; Peltier, J.; Barger, V.A. Enhancing the value co-creation process: Artificial intelligence and mobile banking service platforms. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2021, 15, 68-85. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Shuford, J.; Islam, M.M. Exploring the latest trends in artificial intelligence technology: A comprehensive review. J. Artif. Intell. Gen. Sci. 2024, 2, 3006-4023. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Ai, K.; Liu, Y.; Lu, L.; Cheng, X.; Huo, L. A novel strategy for making soluble reduced graphene oxide sheets cheaply by adopting an endogenous reducing agent. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3365-3370. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Kem, D. Personalised and adaptive learning: Emerging learning platforms in the era of digital and smart learning. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Hum. Res. 2022, 5, 385-391. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Hao, D.; Ai, T.; Goerner, F.; Hu, X.; Runge, V.M.; Tweedle, M. MRI contrast agents: Basic chemistry and safety. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012, 36, 1060-1071. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Khanna, A.; Pandey, B.; Vashishta, K.; Kalia, K.; Pradeepkumar, B.; Das, T. A study of today's AI through chatbots and rediscovery of machine intelligence. Int. J. U E-Serv. Sci. Technol. 2015, 8, 277-284. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Sharma, K.; Papamitsiou, Z.; Giannakos, M. Building pipelines for educational data using AI and multimodal analytics: A "grey-box" approach. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 50, 3004-3031. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Jumpathong, S.; Takhom, A.; Boonkwan, P.; Sutantayawalee, V.; Porkaew, P.; Phaholphinyo, S.; Phrombut, C.; Supnithi, T.; Choke-mangmi, K.; Yamasathien, S.; et al. Construction of Text Summarization Corpus in Economics Domain and Baseline Models. J. Inf. Commun. Converg. Eng. 2024, 22, 33-43. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Seo, J.H. Similar Image Retrieval Technique based on Semantics through Automatic Labeling Extraction of Personalized Images. J. Inf. Commun. Converg. Eng. 2024, 22, 64-69. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Han, R.; Chen, K.; Tan, C. Curiosity-driven recommendation strategy for adaptive learning via deep reinforcement learning. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 2020, 73, 522-540. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Hsieh, T.C.; Wang, T.I.; Su, C.Y.; Lee, M.C. A fuzzy logic-based personalized learning system for supporting adaptive English learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2012, 15, 273-288.
  20. Ahmed, A.M.; Shah, S.M.A. Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to estimate the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of Surma River. J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 2017, 29, 237-243. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Byrne, M.; Archibald-Heeren, B.; Hu, Y.; Teh, A.; Beserminji, R.; Cai, E.; Aland, T. Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Early results of contouring accuracy, treatment plan quality, and treatment time. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2022, 23, e13479. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  22. Istenič Starčič, A. Human learning and learning analytics in the age of artificial intelligence. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 50, 2974-2976. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  23. Pan, X.; Hamilton, A.F.D.C. Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. Br. J. Psychol. 2018, 109, 395-417. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Da, C.; Kireev, D. Structural protein-ligand interaction fingerprints (SPLIF) for structure-based virtual screening: Method and benchmark study. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 2555-2561. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Bock, D.E.; Wolter, J.S.; Ferrell, O.C. Artificial intelligence: Disrupting what we know about services. J. Serv. Mark. 2020, 34, 317-334. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Elkiran, G.; Nourani, V.; Abba, S.I. Multi-step ahead modelling of river water quality parameters using ensemble artificial intelligence-based approach. J. Hydrol. 2019, 577, 123. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Chan, K.W.; Li, S.Y. Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 1033-1040. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Du, J.; Shi, Y.; Zou, Z.; Zhao, D. CoVR: Cloud-based multiuser virtual reality headset system for project communication of remote users. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2018, 144, 04017109. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Iachini, T.; Coello, Y.; Frassinetti, F.; Senese, V.P.; Galante, F.; Ruggiero, G. Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 154-164. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  30. Charlwood, A.; Guenole, N. Can HR adapt to the paradoxes of artificial intelligence? Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2022, 32, 729-742. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  31. Mungoli, N. Leveraging AI and Technology to Address the Challenges of Underdeveloped Countries. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2023, 2, 211-216. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Jones, R.E.; Abdelfattah, K.R. Virtual interviews in the era of COVID-19: A primer for applicants. J. Surg. Educ. 2020, 77, 733-734. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Hermann, E. Leveraging artificial intelligence in marketing for social good-An ethical perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 179, 43-61. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Gorodeski, E.Z.; Goyal, P.; Cox, Z.L.; Thibodeau, J.T.; Reay, R.E.; Rasmusson, K.; Starling, R.C. Virtual visits for care of patients with heart failure in the era of COVID-19: A statement from the Heart Failure Society of America. J. Card. Fail. 2020, 26, 448-456. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Díaz, J. Virtual world as a complement to hybrid and mobile learning. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020, 15, 267-274. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Malik, N.; Tripathi, S.N.; Kar, A.K.; Gupta, S. Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations. Int. J. Manpow. 2021, 43, 334-354. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  37. Ehrlich, H.; McKenney, M.; Elkbuli, A. We asked the experts: Virtual learning in surgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic-Shaping the future of surgical education and training. World J. Surg. 2020, 44, 2053-2055. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Johnson-Glenberg, M.C.; Bartolomea, H.; Kalina, E. Platform is not destiny: Embodied learning effects comparing 2D desktop to 3D virtual reality STEM experiences. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2021, 37, 1263-1284. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, Y., Shin, S.-Y., & Lee, H.-A.
Affiliations
  • Shaanxi University of Technology (CN)
  • Kunsan National University (KR)
  • Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan 54150, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author
Shin, Seong-Yoon
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-12-07
Volume
14
Issue
23
Pages
11410
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405195631
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
adaptive learning, AI agents, metaverse, virtual worlds, user engagement, user satisfaction, decision-making, interaction logs, virtual reality platform, response speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review