Cited by 6Digital Transformation in IndustryModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesSystems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

Towards a Digital Transformation Hyper-Framework: The Essential Design Principles and Components of the Initial Prototype

Open access
Perisic, Ana, Perisic, Branko·2025·Applied Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

To cope with the complexity, the digital transformation of cyber-physical and socio-technology systems demands the utilization of heterogeneous tailorable development environments with dynamic configuring ability and transparent integration of independently developed dedicated frameworks. The essential design principles and component-based architecting of the initial prototype of the digital transformation hyper-framework represent this research target. These principles are derived from the broad scope analysis of digital transformation projects, methods, and tools and are glued to the proposed virtual twin hyper-document. The critical analysis of the digital transformation domain influenced the formulation of five research hypotheses that frame digital transformation of digital transformation, as the second goal of this research article. Armed with a meta-modeling layer, the incremental development of hybrid architecture instances focuses on meta-models and their transformations into functional, interpretable environments. The applicability aspects of the formulated hypothesis are verified throughout the architecture, meta-configuration, and handling of information resources as the essential segments of the initial version of the proposed evolution prototype. The detailed illustration of the horizontal and vertical interoperability of the proposed framework is illustrated by the Life Cycle Modeling component framework that creatively integrates the System, Software, and Operation Engineering aspects of the proposed hyper-framework. The proposed prototype capabilities are discussed in the context of the contemporary digital transformation ecosystem. Specification and development of the additional component frameworks, in compliance with specified generative mechanisms, directing further refinements of the proposed hyper-framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app15020611

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In petabyte-scale deployments with heavily integrated query workloads, inadequately designed hybrid structures may result in up to 25% slower query performance due to improperly integrated joins between relational and NoSQL systems.

    “in petabyte-scale deployments with heavily integrated query workloads, inadequately designed hybrid structures may result in up to 25% of slower query performance since the improperly integrated joins occur between the relational and NoSQL systems (Perisic & Perisic, 2025;Perisic & Perisic, 2024).”

    From A REVIEW ON OBJECT-ORIENTED, OBJECT-RELATIONAL, RELATIONAL, AND NOSQL DATABASES: EVOLUTION, INTEGRATION, AND PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS (2025) · cites this paper as Perisic & Perisic, 2025

    Section 3.2.3 discusses heterogeneous repositories and query optimization, but does not address slower queries caused by joins between relational and NoSQL systems. Searches for the 25% figure and petabyte-scale workloads found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Roblek, V.; Dimovski, V. Essentials of 'the Great Reset' through Complexity Matching. Systems 2024, 12, 182. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Cheung, M. 5 Ideas from Global Diplomacy, System-Wide Transformation Methods to Close the Compliance Gap and Advance the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals; Ground Zero Books LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Hsiao, M.H. Resource integration and firm performance through organizational capabilities for digital transformation. Digit. Transform. Soc. 2024. ahead-of-print. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Fischer, M.; Imgrund, F.; Janiesch, C.; Winkelmann, A. Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103262. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Popoola, O.A.; Adama, H.E.; Chukwuekem, D.O.; Akinoso, A.E. Conceptualizing agile development in digital transformations: Theoretical foundations and practical applications. Eng. Sci. Technol. J. 2024, 5, 1524-1541. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Vial, G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019, 28, 118-144. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zamora Iribarren, M.; Garay-Rondero, C.L.; Lemus-Aguilar, I.; Peimbert-García, R.E. A Review of Industry 4.0 Assessment Instruments for Digital Transformation. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1693. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Hinterhuber, A.; Vescovi, T.; Checchinato, F. (Eds.) Managing Digital Transformation: Understanding the Strategic Process, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Zhang, Y.; Zhuang, G.; Lv, H.; Li, Q. Research on Adaptive Intelligent Decision Algorithm in Industry 4.0 Digital Economy and Management Transformation Based on Clustering Algorithm. Tehničkivjesnik 2024, 31, 870-880. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.T.; Miao, Q.H.; Wang, F.-Y.; Zhao, A.J.; Deng, J.-L.; Li, L.X.; Na, X.X.; Vlacic, L. Steps toward Industry 5.0: Building "6S" parallel industries with cyber-physical-social intelligence. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. 2023, 10, 1692-1703. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Alojaiman, B. Technological Modernizations in the Industry 5.0 Era: A Descriptive Analysis and Future Research Directions. Processes 2023, 11, 1318. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Rahmani, R.; Jesus, C.; Lopes, S.I. Implementations of Digital Transformation and Digital Twins: Exploring the Factory of the Future. Processes 2024, 12, 787. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Duggal, A.S.; Malik, P.K.; Gehlot, A.; Singh, R.; Gaba, G.S.; Masud, M.; Al-Amri, J.F. A sequential roadmap to industry 6.0: Exploring future manufacturing trends. IET Community 2022, 16, 521-531. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Das, S.; Pan, T. A Strategic Outline of Industry 6.0: Exploring the Future. 2022. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 4104696 (accessed on 9 September 2024). · DOI
  15. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Nozari, H.; Bakhshi-Movahed, A.; Bakhshi-Movahed, A. A Conceptual Framework for the Smart Factory 6.0. In Advanced Businesses in Industry 6.0; Oskounejad, M., Nozari, H., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 1-14. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Elia, G.; Solazzo, G.; Lerro, A.; Pigni, F.; Tucci, C.L. The digital transformation canvas: A conceptual framework for leading the digital transformation process. Bus. Horizons. 2024, 67, 381-398. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Butt, A.; Imran, F.; Helo, P.; Kantola, J. Strategic design of culture for digital transformation. Long Range Plan. 2024, 57, 102415. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Ruiz, L.; Benitez, J.; Castillo, A.; Braojos, J. Digital human resource strategy: Conceptualization, theoretical development, and an empirical examination of its impact on firm performance. Inf. Manag. 2024, 61, 103966. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Ben Ghrbeia, S.; Alzubi, A. Building Micro-Foundations for Digital Transformation: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Interplay between Digital Literacy and Digital Transformation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3749. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Exploring the Roles of Artifacts in Speculative Futures: Perspectives in HCI. Systems 2024, 12, 194. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Bantay, L.; Abonyi, J. Machine Learning-Supported Designing of Human-Machine Interfaces. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1564. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Wasilewski, A. Functional Framework for Multivariant E-Commerce User Interfaces. J. Theor. Appl. Electronic. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 412-430. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Song, R. Transforming User Experience (UX) through Artificial Intelligence (AI) in interactive media design. J. Res. Sci. Eng. 2024, 5, 2273-2283. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Casteleiro-Pitrez, J. Generative Artificial Intelligence Image Tools among Future Designers: A Usability, User Experience, and Emotional Analysis. Digital 2024, 4, 316-332. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Sethi, S.; Panda, S. Transforming Digital Experiences: The Evolution of Digital Experience Platforms (DXPs) from Monoliths to Microservices: A Practical Guide. J. Comput. Commun. 2024, 12, 142-155. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Li, J.; Cao, H.; Lin, L.; Hou, Y.; Zhu, R.; ElAli, A. User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'24), Honolulu, HI, USA, 11-16 May 2024; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 1-18. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Al Naqbi, H.; Bahroun, Z.; Ahmed, V. Enhancing Work Productivity through Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1166. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  28. Partarakis, N.; Zabulis, X.A. Review of Immersive Technologies, Knowledge Representation, and AI for Human-Centered Digital Experiences. Electronics 2024, 13, 269. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Laine, T.H.; Suk, H.J. Investigating User Experience of an Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Based on a Gesture-Based User Interface. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4935. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Rawashdeh, A.; Abdallah, A.B.; Alfawaeer, M.; Al Dweiri, M.; Al-Jaghbeer, F. The Impact of Strategic Agility on Environmental Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Digital Transformation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1338. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Aldoseri, A.; Al-Khalifa, K.N.; Hamouda, A.M. AI-Powered Innovation in Digital Transformation: Key Pillars and Industry Impact. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1790. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Zainuddin, A.A.; Zakirudin, M.A.Z.; Syafiq Zulkefli, A.S.; Mazli, A.M.; Mohd Wardi, M.A.S.; Fazail, M.N.; Mohd Razali, M.I.Z.; Yusof, M.H. Artificial Intelligence: A New Paradigm for Distributed Sensor Networks on the Internet of Things: A Review. Int. J. Perceptive Cogn. Comput. 2024, 10, 16-28. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Onopa, S.; Kotulski, Z. State-of-the-Art and New Challenges in 5G Networks with Blockchain Technology. Electronics 2024, 13, 974. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Perišić, A.; Perišić, I.; Perišić, B. Simulation-Based Engineering of Heterogeneous Collaborative Systems-A Novel Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8804. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Perišić, A.; Perišić, B. The Foundation for Open Component Analysis: A System of Systems Hyper Framework Model. In Chapter in Advances in Principal Component Analysis; Pedro García Márquez, F., Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2022. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Perisic, A.; Perisic, B. Digital Twins Verification and Validation Approach through the Quintuple Helix Conceptual Framework. Electronics 2024, 13, 3303. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Ebbs, P.J.; Ward, S.A. ISO18404: A Model for Lean Transformation in an Alliance. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC32), Auckland, New Zealand, 3-5 July 2024; pp. 1255-1267. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Adams, K.M.; Ibrahim, I.; Krahn, S. Engineering Systems with Standards and Digital Models: Development of a 15288-SysML Grid. Systems 2024, 12, 276. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), Version 2.10. 2024, pp. 83-731. Available online: https: //sebokwiki.org/wiki/Guide_to_the_Systems_Engineering_Body_of_Knowledge_(SEBoK) (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  40. Adler, R.; Elberzhager, F.; Falcao, R.; Siebert, J. Defining and Researching "Dynamic Systems of Systems". Software 2024, 3, 183-205. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Borque, P.; Richard, E. (Dick) Fairley Editors. In SWEBOK V3.0, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge; IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA. Available online: https://www.computer.org/education/bodies-of-knowledge/ software-engineering (accessed on 12 August 2024).
  42. McConnell, S.; Tripp, L. Guest Editors' Introduction: Professional Software Engineering-Fact or Fiction? IEEE Softw. 1999, 16, 13-18. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Leng, J. The Development of Research Software Engineering as a Profession. 2023, pp. 278-279. Available online: https://www. openaccessgovernment.org/article/research-software-engineering-as-a-profession-rse/161896/ (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  44. Khan, A.A.; Ahmad, A.; Waseem, M.; Liang, P.; Fahmideh, M.; Mikkonen, T.; Abrahamsson, P. Software architecture for quantum computing systems-A systematic review. J. Syst. Softw. 2023, 201, 111682. [CrossRef] · DOI
  45. Akbar, M.A.; Khan, A.A.; Mahmood, S.; Rafi, S. Quantum Software Engineering: A New Genre of Computing. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Quantum Software Engineering: The Next Evolution (QSE-NE 2024); Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 1-6. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Salam, M.; Ilyas, M. Quantum computing challenges and solutions in software industry-A multivocal literature review. IET Quant. Comm. 2024, 5, 462-485. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Bull, R.L.; Dudukovich, R.M.; Fraire, J.A.; Kortas, N.; Kassouf-Short, R.; Smith, A.; Schweinsberg, E. Network Emula- tion Testbed Capabilities for Prototyping Space DTN Software and Protocols. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Computer and Networking Experimental Research Using Testbeds (CNERT 2024), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 20-23 May 2024. Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https: //ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240002839/downloads/CNERT2024-v2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjT5OfYlOaKAxWLhf0 HHZUMNjkQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0gpL14e8apOtS5HsRixc0d (accessed on 9 September 2024).
  48. El Bouanani, H.; Barakat, C.; Dabbous, W.; Turletti, T. Fidelity-aware large-scale distributed network emulation. Comput. Netw. 2024, 250, 110531. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Fachrur Rozi, N.R.; Nurhayati, A.; Arandiant Rozano, S. Implementation OSPFv3 For Internet Protocol Verses 6 (IPv6) Based On Juniper Routers Use Emulator Virtual Engine-Next Generation (Eve-NG). Int. J. Eng. Contin. 2023, 3, 1-11. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Wei, Z.; Qu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Wu, H.; Du, Y.; Han, K.; Zhang, N.; Feng, Z. Integrated Sensing and Communication Signals Toward 5G-A and 6G: A Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 11068-11092. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  51. Adil, M.; Song, H.; Khan, M.K.; Farouk, A.; Jin, Z. 5G/6G-enabled metaverse technologies: Taxonomy, applications, and open security challenges with future research directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2024, 223, 103828. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Hafeez, S.; Khan, A.R.; Al-Quraan, M.M.; Mohjazi, L.; Zoha, A.; Imran, M.A.; Sun, Y. Blockchain-Assisted UAV Communication Systems: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2023, 4, 558-580. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Khaleel, M.; Ahmed, A.A.; Alsharif, A. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering. Brill. Res. Artif. Intell. 2023, 3, 32-42. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Chaccour, W. Saad; M. Debbah; Z. Han; H.V. Poor, Less Data, More Knowledge: Building Next Generation Semantic Communica- tion Networks. In IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024. [CrossRef] · DOI
  55. Yang, Z.; Chen, M.; Li, G.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Secure Semantic Communications: Fundamentals and Challenges. IEEE Netw. 2024, 38, 513-520. [CrossRef] · DOI
  56. Mavromatis, A.; Colman-Meixner, C.; Silva, A.P.; Vasilakos, X.; Nejabati, R. Simeonidou, D. A Software-Defined IoT Device Management Framework for Edge and Cloud Computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 1718-1735. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Stefanescu, D.; Galán-García, P.; Montalvillo, L.; Unzilla, J.; Urbieta, A. Industrial Data Homogenization and Monitoring Scheme with Blockchain Oracles. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 263-290. [CrossRef] · DOI
  58. Anthopoulos, L.; Nikolaou, I. Homogenizing Data Flows in Smart Cities: Value-driven use Cases in the Era of Citiverse. In Proceedings of the Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 (WWW'24), Singapore, 13-17 May 2024; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 1367-1371. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Casamayor Pujol, V.; Morichetta, A.; Murturi, I.; Kumar Donta, P.; Dustdar, S. Fundamental Research Challenges for Distributed Computing Continuum Systems. Information 2023, 14, 198. [CrossRef] · DOI
  60. Wang, J.; Chen, C.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Cao, X.; Yang, L. Researching the CNN Collaborative Inference Mechanism for Heterogeneous Edge Devices. Sensors 2024, 24, 4176. [CrossRef] · DOI
  61. Ferreira, B.A.; Petrović, T.; Orsag, M.; Dios, J.R.M.-D. Bogdan. Distributed Allocation and Scheduling of Tasks With Cross-Schedule Dependencies for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Teams. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 74327-74342. [CrossRef] · DOI
  62. Tao, F.; Ma, X.; Liu, W.; Zhang, C. Digital Engineering: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Digit. Eng. 2024, 1, 100007. [CrossRef] · DOI
  63. Putrama, I.M.; Martinek, P. Heterogeneous data integration: Challenges and opportunities. Data Brief 2024, 56, 110853. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. SAGE IT, What Is Data Abstraction Layer: A Comprehensive Guide. Available online: https://sageitinc.com/reference-center/ what-is-data-abstraction-layer (accessed on 16 October 2024).
  65. Buede, D.M.; Miller, W.D. The engineering design of system. In Pierre Bourgue; Richard E.s: Models and Methods; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 3-7, ISBN 978-1-119-98403-0.
  66. Rhee, H.L. A New Lifecycle Model Enabling Optimal Digital Curation. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 2024, 56, 241-266. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perisic, A., & Perisic, B.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Independent Researcher, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-01-10
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
611
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406243661
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Keywords
digital transformation, virtual twin, metamodeling, component-based architecture, interoperability, life cycle modeling, cyber-physical systems, socio-technical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review