Cited by 4Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems DesignAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

A New Anti-Windup Compensator Based on Quantitative Feedback Theory for an Uncertain Linear System with Input Saturation

Open access
Jeyasenthil, R., Choi, Seung-Bok·2019·Applied Sciences

Abstract

This paper devotes to the robust stability problem for an uncertain linear time invariant (LTI) feedback system with actuator saturation nonlinearity. Based on a three degree of freedom (DOF) non-interfering control structure, the robust stability is enforced with the describing function (DF) approach for an uncertain LTI system to avoid the limit cycle. A new type of anti-windup (AW) compensator is designed using the quantitative feedback theory (QFT) graphical method, which results in a simple design procedure and low-order AW control system. One of the most significant benefits of the proposed method is free of the non-convexity (intractable) drawback of the linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based approach. The analysis conducted on the benchmark problem clearly reveals that the proposed QFT-based anti-windup design is able to handle both saturation and uncertainty in a very effective manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app9152958

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the structure of a control object is uncertain and disturbance is present, a highly robust controller is to be designed based on the frequency domain theory of the control system.

    “When the structure of a control object is uncertain and disturbance is present, a highly robust controller is to be designed based on the frequency domain theory of the control system.”

    From Force Compensation Control for Electro-Hydraulic Servo System with Pump–Valve Compound Drive via QFT–DTOC (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract and Conclusions describe a QFT-based anti-windup controller designed for robust stability in an uncertain linear system, supporting the frequency-domain design point. The condition studied is actuator saturation, not the presence of a disturbance; the Introduction mentions a disturbance filter only when discussing another method. The claim’s disturbance condition is therefore not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A QFT controller is a robust controller based on the frequency domain.

    “A QFT controller [28-30] is a robust controller based on the frequency domain.”
  • By designing appropriate transfer functions P(s) and F(s), the control system can satisfy the design performance index, and the bandwidth of the QFT controller can be minimized.

    “By designing the appropriate transfer functions P ( s ) and F ( s ) , the control system can satisfy the design performance index, and the bandwidth of the QFT controller can be minimized.”

    From Force Compensation Control for Electro-Hydraulic Servo System with Pump–Valve Compound Drive via QFT–DTOC (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction identifies P as the uncertain system and F as the prefilter, while the Conclusions describe designing an anti-windup controller for robust stability. Neither passage says that designing P(s) and F(s) satisfies a performance index or minimizes QFT-controller bandwidth; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeyasenthil, R., & Choi, S.-B.
Affiliations
Inha University (KR)
Corresponding author
Choi, Seung-Bok
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-07-24
Volume
9
Issue
15
Pages
2958
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963328685
Cited by
4
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation
  • National Research Foundation
  • Inha University
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
anti-windup compensator, quantitative feedback theory, actuator saturation, robust stability, uncertain linear time-invariant systems, three-degree-of-freedom control, non-convex optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review