The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Process Security Risks
Open accessAbstract
The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has found a unique and prominent role in Industry 4.0 and is rapidly gaining popularity in the manufacturing industry. 3D printing offers many advantages over conventional manufacturing methods, making it an attractive alternative that is more cost-effective and efficient than conventional manufacturing methods. With the Internet of Things (IoT) at the heart of this new movement, control over manufacturing methods now enters the cyber domain, offering endless possibilities in manufacturing automation and optimization. However, as disruptive and innovative as this may seem, there is grave concern about the cyber-security risks involved. These security aspects are often overlooked, particularly by promising new start-ups and parties that are not too familiar with the risks involved in not having proper cyber-security measures in place. This paper explores some of the cyber-security risks involved in the bridge between industrial manufacturing and Industry 4.0, as well as the associated countermeasures already deployed or currently under development. These aspects are then contextualized in terms of Industry 4.0 in order to serve as a basis for and assist with future development in this field.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It currently provides 45,000 product classes with 19,000 belonging property descriptions with unique, machine-readable identifiers [167].”
From SCADA Systems With Focus on Continuous Manufacturing and Steel Industry: A Survey on Architectures, Standards, Challenges and Industry 5.0 (2022) · cites this paper as [167]
In the citing paper
“Globally recognized, Eclass is already the de facto standard in B2B applications used by 3,500 companies worldwide.”
From SCADA Systems With Focus on Continuous Manufacturing and Steel Industry: A Survey on Architectures, Standards, Challenges and Industry 5.0 (2022) · cites this paper as [167]
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“This forms part of what is referred to as the “Triple Bottom Line” [22,23] that considers the sustainability of industries and businesses in the context of the associated economic, environmental and social impacts.”
BackgroundPast, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 · Cited by 2,036
Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security
Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., & Hahn, A. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-82r2 · Cited by 1,377 · cited 1×
“Officially published security guidelines specifically aimed at securing the industrial manufacturing environment, such as NIST SP 800-82 [44] and IEC 62443 [45], can be used to aid in the formulation of these security policies and procedures [3].”
Method5G Internet of Things: A survey
Li, S., Xu, L. D., & Zhao, S. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2018.01.005 · Cited by 1,307
Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”
Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200414211 · Cited by 1,238
Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010247 · Cited by 1,118
SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIAL VALUE CREATION: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF INDUSTRY 4.0
KIEL, D., Müller, J. M., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919617400151 · Cited by 845
Before we knew it: an empirical study of zero-day attacks in the real world
Bilge, L., & Dumitraş, T. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/2382196.2382284 · Cited by 627
Security of smart manufacturing systems
Tuptuk, N., & Hailes, S. M. V. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.007 · Cited by 495
Yan, J., Meng, Y., Lü, L., & Lin, L. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2765544 · Cited by 479
Birkel, H. S., Veile, J. W., Müller, J. M., Hartmann, E., & Voigt, K. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020384 · Cited by 431
Developments in 4D-printing: a review on current smart materials, technologies, and applications
Zhang, Z., Demir, K. G., & Gu, G. X. (2019) · International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials · doi:10.1080/19475411.2019.1591541 · Cited by 393
Song, H. (2013) · doi:10.1145/2491185.2491190 · Cited by 367
Aspects of Risk Management Implementation for Industry 4.0
Tupa, J., Šimota, J., & Steiner, F. (2017) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.248 · Cited by 293
Manufacturing and Security Challenges in 3D Printing
Zeltmann, S. E., Gupta, N., Tsoutsos, N. G., Maniatakos, M., Rajendran, J., & Karri, R. (2016) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-016-1937-7 · Cited by 245
Acoustic side-channel attacks on printers
Michael Backes, A., Dürmuth, M., Gerling, S., Pinkal, M., & Sporleder, C. (2010) · Cited by 185
A comprehensive survey of interface protocols for software defined networks
Latif, Z., Sharif, K., Li, F., Karim, M. M., Biswas, S., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102563 · Cited by 175
A Survey of Current Challenges in Manufacturing Industry and Preparation for Industry 4.0
Khan, A., & Turowski, K. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33609-1_2 · Cited by 173
Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0: Analysis for Design and Manufacturing
(2017) · Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50660-9 · Cited by 162
Advanced Material Strategies for Next-Generation Additive Manufacturing
Chang, J., He, J., Mao, M., Zhou, W., Lei, Q., Li, X., Li, D., Chua, C.-K., & Zhao, X. (2018) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma11010166 · Cited by 115
My Smartphone Knows What You Print
Song, C., Lin, F., Ba, Z., Ren, K., Zhou, C., & Xu, W. (2016) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978300 · Cited by 105
Chhetri, S. R., Canedo, A., & Faruque, M. A. A. (2016) · doi:10.1145/2966986.2967050 · Cited by 103
Ransomware: taking businesses hostage
Mansfield-Devine, S. (2016) · Network Security · doi:10.1016/s1353-4858(16)30096-4 · Cited by 100
Securing the Industrial Internet
Gilchrist, A. (2016) · Industry 4.0 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-2047-4_12 · Cited by 85
Riel, A., Kreiner, C., Macher, G., & Messnarz, R. (2017) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.037 · Cited by 81
Intellectual Property Protection in Additive Layer Manufacturing
Yampolskiy, M., Andel, T. R., McDonald, J. T., Glisson, W. B., & Yasinsac, A. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2689702.2689709 · Cited by 70
Hojjati, A., Adhikari, A., Struckmann, K. M., Chou, E., Nguyen, T. N. T., Madan, K., Winslett, M., Gunter, C. A., & King, W. P. (2016) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978323 · Cited by 66
Network Programmability With ForCES
Haleplidis, E., Salim, J. H., Halpern, J. M., Hares, S., Pentikousis, K., Ogawa, K., Wang, W., Denazis, S., & Koufopavlou, O. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2439033 · Cited by 50
Riel, A., Kreiner, C., Messnarz, R., & Much, A. (2018) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.022 · Cited by 34
Geometry-preserving Encryption for 3D Meshes
Éluard, M., Maetz, Y., & Doërr, G. (2013) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.3925.6165 · Cited by 24
Selective Encryption Algorithm for 3D Printing Model Based on Clustering and DCT Domain
Pham, G. N., Kwon, K., Lee, E.-J., & Lee, S. (2017) · Journal of Computing Science and Engineering · doi:10.5626/jcse.2017.11.4.152 · Cited by 9
Pham, G. N., Lee, S., Kwon, O., & Kwon, K. (2018) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics7050064 · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Belikovetsky, S., Yampolskiy, M., Toh, J., Gatlin, J., and Elovici, Y. (2016, January 10–12). dr0wned-Cyber-Physical Attack with Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the WOOT’17 11th USENIX Conference on Offensive Technologies, Austin, TX, USA.
- Miková, T. (2018). Cyber Attack on Ukrainian Power Grid. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Masaryk University].
- Faruque, M.A.A., Chhetri, S.R., Canedo, A., and Wan, J. (2016, January 11–14). Acoustic Side-Channel Attacks on Additive Manufacturing Systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Vienna, Austria.
- Bayens, C., Le, T., Garcia, L., Beyah, R., Javanmard, M., and Zonouz, S. (2017, January 16–18). See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Feel No Evil, Print No Evil? Malicious Fill Pattern Detection in Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Santhi, A. R., & Muthuswamy, P. (2023) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8 · Cited by 438
Folgado, F. J., Calderón, D., González, I., & Calderón, A. J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13040782 · Cited by 209
“Similarly, according to [31], Industry 4.0 involves the integration of various technologies, particularly IoT technologies, into existing technologies used in the production and industrial manufacturing sectors.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Review of Cybersecurity Guidelines for Manufacturing Factories in Industry 4.0
Mullet, V., Sondi, P., & Ramat, E. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3056650 · Cited by 161
“0 concepts and applications is proposed in [6], as well as some recent cybersecurity attacks observed in several manufacturing factories in the world.”
BackgroundExploring the potential of 3D scanning in Industry 4.0: An overview
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., Rab, S., Suman, R., Kumar, L., & Khan, I. H. (2022) · International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2022.08.003 · Cited by 149
Internet of Things Approaches for Monitoring and Control of Smart Greenhouses in Industry 4.0
Bersani, C., Ruggiero, C., Sacile, R., Soussi, A., & Zero, E. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15103834 · Cited by 128
“Technological advances, such as massive data analysis algorithms [15,16], IoT [17], and cloud computing [18], are more and more present in industrial companies and are causing the emergence of new process control concepts, new service proposals, and new products [19,20].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Prinsloo, J., Sinha, S., & von Solms, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- Centre for Cyber Security, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
- Corresponding author
- Prinsloo, Jaco
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-11-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 5105
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991571699
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- Industry 4.0, cybersecurity risks, 3D printing, Internet of Things, industrial automation, manufacturing security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
