Cited by 39Extraction and Separation ProcessesRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesMetal Extraction and Bioleaching

Recovery of Cobalt from Spent Lithium-Ion Mobile Phone Batteries Using Liquid–Liquid Extraction

Open access
Quintero-Almanza, Daniel, Gamiño-Arroyo, Zeferino, Sánchez-Cadena, Lorena Eugenia, Gómez-Castro, Fernando Israel, Uribe-Ramírez, Agustín Ramón, Aguilera-Alvarado, Alberto Florentino, Ocampo Carmona, Luz Marina·2019·Batteries

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to propose and test a continuous cobalt recovery process from waste mobile phone batteries. The procedure started with dismantling, crushing, and classifying the materials. A study on leaching with sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide was carried out with subsequent selective separation of cobalt by means of liquid–liquid extraction. The best extraction conditions were determined based on a sequence of experiments that consisted of selecting the best extractant for cobalt, then assessing the impact of extractant concentration, pH, and contact time on the extraction yield. With these conditions, an extraction isotherm was obtained and correlated with a mathematical model to define the number of extraction stages for a countercurrent process using the McCabe–Thiele method. Then, a similar study was done for stripping conditions and, as a last step, cobalt electroplating was performed. The proposed process offers a solution for the treatment of these batteries, avoiding potential problems of contamination and risk for living beings, as well as offering an opportunity to recover valuable metal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/batteries5020044

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quintero-Almanza, D., Gamiño-Arroyo, Z., Sánchez-Cadena, L. E., Gómez-Castro, F. I., Uribe-Ramírez, A. R., Aguilera-Alvarado, A. F., & Ocampo Carmona, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Guanajuato (MX)
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Guanajuato, Campus Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, Col. Noria Alta, Guanajuato 36050, Mexico
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Guanajuato, Campus Guanajuato, Avenida Juárez No. 77, Col. Centro, Guanajuato 36050, Mexico
  • Departamento de Materiales y Minerales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Calle 75 N. 79 A 51 Bloque M17 of 407-05, Medellín 050034, Colombia
Venue
Batteries
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
44
ISSN
2313-0105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943652328
Cited by
39
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Batteries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universidad de Guanajuato (project 1,078/2016.)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
Keywords
cobalt recovery, spent lithium-ion batteries, mobile phone batteries, liquid-liquid extraction, sulfuric acid leaching, hydrogen peroxide, selective separation, extraction isotherms, countercurrent extraction, stripping, battery recycling, metal recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review