The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Local Outlier Factor Algorithms for Outlier Detection in Big Data Streams
Open accessAbstract
Outlier detection is a statistical procedure that aims to find suspicious events or items that are different from the normal form of a dataset. It has drawn considerable interest in the field of data mining and machine learning. Outlier detection is important in many applications, including fraud detection in credit card transactions and network intrusion detection. There are two general types of outlier detection: global and local. Global outliers fall outside the normal range for an entire dataset, whereas local outliers may fall within the normal range for the entire dataset, but outside the normal range for the surrounding data points. This paper addresses local outlier detection. The best-known technique for local outlier detection is the Local Outlier Factor (LOF), a density-based technique. There are many LOF algorithms for a static data environment; however, these algorithms cannot be applied directly to data streams, which are an important type of big data. In general, local outlier detection algorithms for data streams are still deficient and better algorithms need to be developed that can effectively analyze the high velocity of data streams to detect local outliers. This paper presents a literature review of local outlier detection algorithms in static and stream environments, with an emphasis on LOF algorithms. It collects and categorizes existing local outlier detection algorithms and analyzes their characteristics. Furthermore, the paper discusses the advantages and limitations of those algorithms and proposes several promising directions for developing improved local outlier detection methods for data streams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution
Schölkopf, B., Platt, J. C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A. J., & Williamson, R. C. (2001) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976601750264965 · Cited by 6,168
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
A Comparative Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Multivariate Data
Goldstein, M., & Uchida, S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152173 · Cited by 1,032
Aggarwal, C. C. (2015) · Data Mining · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14142-8_8 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Nankya, M., Chataut, R., & Akl, R. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218840 · Cited by 114
Bałdyga, M., Barański, K., Belter, J., Kalinowski, M., & Weichbroth, P. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24082633 · Cited by 40
One-Class Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications: A Comparative Survey and Experimental Study
Paolini, D., Dini, P., Soldaini, E., & Saponara, S. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14070281 · Cited by 21
Cyber-Attack Detection and Localization for SCADA system of CPSs
Li, D., Tang, J., Wu, S., Zheng, Z., & Ng, S.-K. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/ACM Second International Conference on AI Foundation Models and Software Engineering (Forge) · doi:10.1109/forge66646.2025.00038 · Cited by 1
Liu, C. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09410-3 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Alghushairy, O., Alsini, R., Soule, T., & Ma, X.
- Venue
- Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-12-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 2504-2289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3117098906
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Local Outlier Factor Algorithms for Outlier Detection in Big Data Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/bdcc5010001
- The paper
- Alghushairy, O., Alsini, R., Soule, T., & Ma, X. (2020). A Review of Local Outlier Factor Algorithms for Outlier Detection in Big Data Streams. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5010001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.