Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning

Chen, Yiming, Liang, Shuang·2023·Big Data and Cognitive Computing

Abstract

In the field of education, cognitive diagnosis is crucial for achieving personalized learning. The widely adopted DINA (Deterministic Inputs, Noisy And gate) model uncovers students’ mastery of essential skills necessary to answer questions correctly. However, existing DINA-based approaches overlook the dependency between knowledge points, and their model training process is computationally inefficient for large datasets. In this paper, we propose a new cognitive diagnosis model called BNMI-DINA, which stands for Bayesian Network-based Multiprocess Incremental DINA. Our proposed model aims to enhance personalized learning by providing accurate and detailed assessments of students’ cognitive abilities. By incorporating a Bayesian network, BNMI-DINA establishes the dependency relationship between knowledge points, enabling more accurate evaluations of students’ mastery levels. To enhance model convergence speed, key steps of our proposed algorithm are parallelized. We also provide theoretical proof of the convergence of BNMI-DINA. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach effectively enhances model accuracy and reduces computational time compared to state-of-the-art cognitive diagnosis models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bdcc8010004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Templin, 2006, Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models, Psychol. Methods, 11, 287, 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287 · DOI
  2. Wang, 2023, Dynamic Cognitive Diagnosis: An Educational Priors-Enhanced Deep Knowledge Tracing Perspective, IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 16, 306, 10.1109/TLT.2023.3254544 · DOI
  3. Liu, 2023, New development of cognitive diagnosis models, Front. Comput. Sci., 17, 171604, 10.1007/s11704-022-1128-3 · DOI
  4. Luo, J., and Hubaux, J.P. (2006). Embedded Security in Cars: Securing Current and Future Automotive IT Applications, Springer.
  5. 2009, DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic, J. Educ. Behav. Stat., 34, 115, 10.3102/1076998607309474 · DOI
  6. Wafa, 2023, Consistency and Ability of Students Using DINA and DINO Models, Eur. J. Math. Stat., 4, 7, 10.24018/ejmath.2023.4.4.230 · DOI
  7. Frederiksen, N., Mislevy, R.J., and Bejar, I.I. (2012). Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests, Routledge. · DOI
  8. Nichols, P.D., Chipman, S.F., and Brennan, R.L. (2012). Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment, Routledge. · DOI
  9. Leighton, J., and Gierl, M. (2007). Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  10. Lee, 2009, Cognitive diagnosis approaches to language assessment: An overview, Lang. Assess. Q., 6, 172, 10.1080/15434300902985108 · DOI
  11. Li, 2016, The selection of cognitive diagnostic models for a reading comprehension test, Lang. Test., 33, 391, 10.1177/0265532215590848 · DOI
  12. Yang, 2023, Cognitive diagnosis-based personalized exercise group assembly via a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., 7, 829, 10.1109/TETCI.2022.3220812 · DOI
  13. Qi, 2023, ICD: A new interpretable cognitive diagnosis model for intelligent tutor systems, Expert Syst. Appl., 215, 119309, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119309 · DOI
  14. Ma, 2023, Predicting Student Performance in Future Exams via Neutrosophic Cognitive Diagnosis in Personalized E-learning Environment, IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 16, 680, 10.1109/TLT.2023.3240931 · DOI
  15. Gao, W., Wang, H., Liu, Q., Wang, F., Lin, X., Yue, L., Zhang, Z., Lv, R., and Wang, S. (2023, January 23–27). Leveraging Transferable Knowledge Concept Graph Embedding for Cold-Start Cognitive Diagnosis. Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Taipei, Taiwan. · DOI
  16. Wang, S., Zeng, Z., Yang, X., and Zhang, X. (2023, January 7–14). Self-supervised graph learning for long-tailed cognitive diagnosis. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA.
  17. Wu, R., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, E., Su, Y., Chen, Z., and Hu, G. (2015, January 25–31). Cognitive modelling for predicting examinee performance. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  18. Douglas, 2004, Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis, Psychometrika, 69, 333, 10.1007/BF02295640 · DOI
  19. Tu, 2010, A polytomous cognitive diagnosis model: P-DINA model, Acta Psychol. Sin., 42, 1011, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.01011 · DOI
  20. Aryadoust, 2021, A cognitive diagnostic assessment study of the listening test of the Singapore–Cambridge general certificate of education O-level: Application of DINA, DINO, G-DINA, HO-DINA, and RRUM, Int. J. List., 35, 29, 10.1080/10904018.2018.1500915 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2018, The rapid calculation method of DINA model for large scale cognitive diagnosis, Acta Electonica Sin., 46, 1047
  22. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI
  23. Tang, 2023, COVID-19 medical waste transportation risk evaluation integrating type-2 fuzzy total interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, Expert Syst. Appl., 213, 118885, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118885 · DOI
  24. Chan, L.S., Chu, A.M., and So, M.K. (2023). A moving-window bayesian network model for assessing systemic risk in financial markets. PLoS ONE, 18. · DOI
  25. Kamil, 2023, Textual data transformations using natural language processing for risk assessment, Risk Anal., 43, 2033, 10.1111/risa.14100 · DOI
  26. Yang, 2022, A novel quantitative relationship neural network for explainable cognitive diagnosis model, Knowl. Based Syst., 250, 109156, 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109156 · DOI
  27. VanLehn, 2005, The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 15, 147
  28. Käser, T., Klingler, S., Schwing, A.G., and Gross, M. (2014, January 5–9). Beyond knowledge tracing: Modeling skill topologies with bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 12th International Conference, ITS 2014, Honolulu, HI, USA. · DOI
  29. 2017, Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: An overview of learner modeling techniques, User Model. User Adapt. Interact., 27, 313, 10.1007/s11257-017-9193-2 · DOI
  30. Liu, S., Qu, H., Chen, Q., Jian, W., Liu, R., and You, L. (2022, January 15–18). AFMeta: Asynchronous Federated Meta-learning with Temporally Weighted Aggregation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Digital Twin, Privacy Computing, Metaverse, Autonomous & Trusted Vehicles (SmartWorld/UIC/ScalCom/DigitalTwin/PriComp/Meta), Haikou, China. · DOI
  31. Liu, 2023, An effective learning evaluation method based on text data with real-time attribution-a case study for mathematical class with students of junior middle school in China, ACM Trans. Asian Low Resour. Lang. Inf. Process., 22, 1
  32. Liu, S., Yu, X., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Qin, C., and Zhang, X. (2023, January 21–25). Homogeneous Cohort-Aware Group Cognitive Diagnosis: A Multi-grained Modeling Perspective. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Birmingham, UK. · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2023, A generalized multi-skill aggregation method for cognitive diagnosis, World Wide Web, 26, 585, 10.1007/s11280-021-00990-4 · DOI
  34. Zhang, 2020, Bayesian estimation of the dina model with Pólya-gamma Gibbs sampling, Front. Psychol., 11, 384, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00384 · DOI
  35. Bi, H., Chen, E., He, W., Wu, H., Zhao, W., Wang, S., and Wu, J. (2023, January 7–14). BETA-CD: A Bayesian meta-learned cognitive diagnosis framework for personalized learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA. · DOI
  36. McLachlan, G. (September, January 28). On Aitken’s method and other approaches for accelerating convergence of the EM algorithm. Proceedings of the AC Aitken Centenary Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  37. Dempster, 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 39, 1, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Geiger, 1990, Logical and algorithmic properties of independence and their application to Bayesian networks, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 2, 165, 10.1007/BF01531004 · DOI
  39. Thiesson, 2001, Accelerating EM for large databases, Mach. Learn., 45, 279, 10.1023/A:1017986506241 · DOI
  40. Chang, H.S., Hsu, H.J., and Chen, K.T. (2015, January 26–29). Modeling Exercise Relationships in E-Learning: A Unified Approach. Proceedings of the EDM, Madrid, Spain.
  41. Hadi, 2023, Evaluating pre-trained models for user feedback analysis in software engineering: A study on classification of app-reviews, Empir. Softw. Eng., 28, 88, 10.1007/s10664-023-10314-x · DOI
  42. Koren, 2009, Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, Computer, 42, 30, 10.1109/MC.2009.263 · DOI
  43. Wang, 2022, NeuralCD: A general framework for cognitive diagnosis, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 35, 8312, 10.1109/TKDE.2022.3201037 · DOI
  44. Li, J., Wang, F., Liu, Q., Zhu, M., Huang, W., Huang, Z., Chen, E., Su, Y., and Wang, S. (2022, January 14–18). HierCDF: A Bayesian Network-based Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnosis Framework. Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., & Liang, S.
Venue
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-12-29
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
4
ISSN
2504-2289
Cited by
6
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/bdcc8010004
The paper
Chen, Y., & Liang, S. (2023). BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8010004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.