Cited by 20Algal biology and biofuel productionWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesSmart Agriculture and AI

Real-Time Algal Monitoring Using Novel Machine Learning Approaches

Open access
Uguz, Seyit, Sahin, Yavuz Selim, Kumar, Pradeep, Yang, Xufei, Anderson, Gary·2025·Big Data and Cognitive Computing

Abstract

Monitoring algal growth rates and estimating microalgae concentration in photobioreactor systems are critical for optimizing production efficiency. Traditional methods—such as microscopy, fluorescence, flow cytometry, spectroscopy, and macroscopic approaches—while accurate, are often costly, time-consuming, labor-intensive, and susceptible to contamination or production interference. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes an automated, real-time, and cost-effective solution by integrating machine learning with image-based analysis. We evaluated the performance of Decision Trees (DTS), Random Forests (RF), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) algorithms using RGB color histograms extracted from images of Scenedesmus dimorphus cultures. Ground truth data were obtained via manual cell enumeration under a microscope and dry biomass measurements. Among the models tested, DTS achieved the highest accuracy for cell count prediction (R2 = 0.77), while RF demonstrated superior performance for dry biomass estimation (R2 = 0.66). Compared to conventional methods, the proposed ML-based approach offers a low-cost, non-invasive, and scalable alternative that significantly reduces manual effort and response time. These findings highlight the potential of machine learning–driven imaging systems for continuous, real-time monitoring in industrial-scale microalgae cultivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bdcc9060153

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biological and optical instruments such as flow cytometry, spectroscopy (NIR, FTIR), and RGB image analysis offer more comprehensive data that provide insight into biomass dynamics and metabolite accumulation.

    “However, biological and optical instruments such as flow cytometry, spectroscopy (NIR, FTIR), and RGB image analysis offer more comprehensive data that provide insight into biomass dynamics and metabolite accumulation [260].”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [260]

    The Introduction identifies flow cytometry and spectroscopy as algal monitoring methods, and the Results and Discussion link RGB image analysis to biomass concentration. The cited paper does not specify NIR or FTIR, establish that these methods provide more comprehensive data, or show that they reveal metabolite accumulation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goswami, R.C.D.; Kalita, M.C. Scenedesmus Dimorphus and Scenedesmus Quadricauda: Two Potent Indigenous Microalgae Strains for Biomass Production and CO 2 Mitigation-A Study on Their Growth Behaviour and Lipid Productivity under Different Concentration of Urea as Nitrogen Source. J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2011, 2, 42-49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uguz, S., Sahin, Y. S., Kumar, P., Yang, X., & Anderson, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Bursa Uludag University, Gorukle, Bursa 16240, Turkey
  • South Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Gary
Venue
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-06-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
153
ISSN
2504-2289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411157788
Cited by
20
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data and Cognitive Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
The Council of Higher Education of Turkey (YUDAB Scholarship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
photobioreactors, Scenedesmus dimorphus, cell count estimation, RGB color histogram, vision-based monitoring, real-time monitoring, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, low-cost monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review