Cited by 0Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationEchinoderm biology and ecology

Exploring Biomineralization in Echinoderms: A Review of Gene Regulatory Networks Through Bibliometrics and Comparative Genomics

Open access
Guo, Xueying, Cong, Xiao, Yu, Zhenglin, Yuan, Xiutang·2026·Biology

Abstract

Biomineralization is a defining feature of echinoderms and underlies the formation of their calcitic endoskeletons. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the molecular basis of echinoderm biomineralization, particularly in sea urchins. However, studies of other echinoderm classes remain limited, and a comprehensive comparison of biomineralization genes and gene regulatory networks across the phylum is still lacking. Here, we combine bibliometric analysis with comparative genomic evidence to summarize current advances in echinoderm biomineralization research. Bibliometric analyses reveal the development of the field, major research themes, and emerging directions, whereas comparative genomic analyses provide an overview of biomineralization genes and gene regulatory networks across different echinoderm classes. Comparative evidence indicates that many transcription factors associated with skeletogenesis are widely distributed across echinoderms. In contrast, biomineralization genes exhibit substantial variation among echinoderm classes. These similarities and differences suggest that broadly shared developmental regulators have been integrated with lineage-specific biomineralization genes to generate the diversity of echinoderm skeletal structures. This review provides a comprehensive overview of biomineralization genes and gene regulatory networks in echinoderms and establishes a comparative framework for future studies of skeletal development, gene regulation, and the evolution of biomineralization across the phylum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biology15201796

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guo, X., Cong, X., Yu, Z., & Yuan, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Xiutang
Venue
Biology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-10-09
Volume
15
Issue
20
Pages
1796
ISSN
2079-7737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7221115822
Cited by
0
References
4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (42476149, 42606189)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2025QC199)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
Keywords
biomineralization, Echinodermata, gene regulatory networks, sea urchins, skeletogenesis, transcription factors, comparative genomics, skeletal development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review