Cited by 52Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

A Structural Switch between Agonist and Antagonist Bound Conformations for a Ligand-Optimized Model of the Human Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligand Binding Domain

Open access
Perkins, Arden, Phillips, Jessica, Kerkvliet, Nancy, Tanguay, Robert, Perdew, Gary, Kolluri, Siva, Bisson, William·2014·Biology

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates the expression of a diverse group of genes. Exogenous AHR ligands include the environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), which is a potent agonist, and the synthetic AHR antagonist N-2-(1H-indol-3yl)ethyl)-9-isopropyl-2- (5-methylpyridin-3-yl)-9H-purin-6-amine (GNF351). As no experimentally determined structure of the ligand binding domain exists, homology models have been utilized for virtual ligand screening (VLS) to search for novel ligands. Here, we have developed an “agonist-optimized” homology model of the human AHR ligand binding domain, and this model aided in the discovery of two human AHR agonists by VLS. In addition, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of an agonist TCDD-bound and antagonist GNF351-bound version of this model in order to gain insights into the mechanics of the AHR ligand-binding pocket. These simulations identified residues 307–329 as a flexible segment of the AHR ligand pocket that adopts discrete conformations upon agonist or antagonist binding. This flexible segment of the AHR may act as a structural switch that determines the agonist or antagonist activity of a given AHR ligand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biology3040645

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Employment of PAS-B structures of HIF-2α in complex with ligands as templates greatly improved the quality of the modeled binding site, and inclusion of receptor flexibility in docking enabled better description of the binding event.

    “Not only did the employment of PAS-B structures of the homologous HIF-2α protein in complex with ligands as templates for modeling greatly improve the quality of the modeled binding site, but the inclusion of a certain degree of receptor flexibility in docking calculations enabled us and other investigators to better describe the binding event19,24–26.”

    From Modeling the binding of diverse ligands within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

    In §2.2 (page unavailable), the ligand-bound HIF-2α crystal-template model identified only 1 of 16 known agonists, versus 14 of 16 for the ligand-optimized NMR-template model; the authors describe the crystal-based model as performing poorly. §§2.1–2.2 specify rigid docking with receptor atoms fixed. The paper optimized pocket side chains separately, but does not support the claim that receptor flexibility was included in docking calculations. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent docking studies allowed prediction of the binding modes of several AhR ligands and led to the discovery of novel AhR agonists and SAhRMs.

    “On the basis of these novel approaches, recent docking studies not only allowed prediction of the binding modes of several AhR ligands but also led to the discovery of novel AhR agonists and SAhRMs25,27–30.”

    From Modeling the binding of diverse ligands within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction and Results §3.1 describe docking-based predictions of binding interactions for several AhR ligands, and the Introduction says virtual screening identified novel agonists confirmed in cell-based assays. The paper does not report discovering novel SAhRMs; the Conclusions instead describe discovery of AhR modulators as a future prospect. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins, A., Phillips, J., Kerkvliet, N., Tanguay, R., Perdew, G., Kolluri, S., & Bisson, W.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kolluri, Siva
  • Bisson, William
Venue
Biology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2014-10-17
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
645-669
ISSN
2079-7737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088241167
Cited by
52
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Oregon State University (P42 ES016465, P30ES000210)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES016651, R01ES004869, P30ES000210, R01ES019964, R21ES019000, P42ES016465)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
aryl hydrocarbon receptor, ligand-binding domain, homology modeling, virtual ligand screening, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, molecular dynamics simulation, transcription factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review