Cited by 15Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Sex X Time Interactions in Lp(a) and LDL-C Response to Evolocumab

Open access
Fogacci, Federica, Yerlitaş, Serra İlayda, Giovannini, Marina, Zararsız, Gökmen, Lido, Paolo, Borghi, Claudio, Cicero, Arrigo F. G.·2023·Biomedicines

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there were significant sex x time interactions in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) response to treatment with the Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) Evolocumab, in a real-life clinical setting. For this purpose, we pooled data from 176 outpatients (Men: 93; Women: 83) clinically evaluated at baseline and every six months after starting Evolocumab. Individuals who had been on PCSK9i for less than 30 months and nonadherent patients were excluded from the analysis. Over time, absolute values of Lp(a) plasma concentrations significantly decreased in the entire cohort (p-value < 0.001) and by sex (p-value < 0.001 in men and p-value = 0.002 in and women). However, there were no sex-related significant differences. Absolute plasma concentrations of LDL-C significantly decreased over time in the entire cohort and by sex (p-value < 0.001 always), with greater improvements in men compared to women. The sex x time interaction was statistically significant in LDL-C (all p-values < 0.05), while absolute changes in Lp(a) were not influenced by either sex or time (all p-value > 0.05). Our data partially reinforce the presence of differences in response to treatment to PCSK9i between men and women and are essential to gain a better understanding of the relationship between LDL-C and Lp(a) lowering in response to PCSK9i. Further research will clarify whether these sex-related significant differences translate into a meaningful difference in the long-term risk of ASCVD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biomedicines11123271

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCSK9 inhibitors produce a median reduction in Lp(a) percentage, but this reduction does not translate into a decrease in cardiovascular events.

    “Clinical trials have shown a median reduction in Lp(a) percentage with PCSK9 inhibitors, but this reduction does not translate into a decrease in cardiovascular events [14,15].”

    From Residual Cardiovascular Risk: Role of Remnants Cholesterol, Monocyte/HDL Ratio and Lipoprotein Ratios on Personalized Cardiovascular Prevention (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction reports percentage reductions in Lp(a) with PCSK9 inhibitors, but gives mean differences rather than a median reduction. The Discussion says forthcoming cardiovascular outcome trials will clarify whether lowering Lp(a) improves outcomes; it does not establish that the reduction fails to decrease cardiovascular events. The study registered no major cardiovascular events during follow-up, which cannot establish a lack of benefit. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fogacci, F., Yerlitaş, S. İ., Giovannini, M., Zararsız, G., Lido, P., Borghi, C., & Cicero, A. F. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Erciyes University (TR)
  • Italian Medicines Agency (IT)
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
Corresponding author
Cicero, Arrigo F. G.
Venue
Biomedicines
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-12-11
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
3271
ISSN
2227-9059 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389574430
Cited by
15
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedicines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Ministero della Salute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
evolocumab, PCSK9 inhibitors, lipoprotein(a), LDL cholesterol, sex differences, treatment response, hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review