CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 254Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchCognitive Science and Education Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 49 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The “Id” Knows More than the “Ego” Admits: Neuropsychoanalytic and Primal Consciousness Perspectives on the Interface Between Affective and Cognitive Neuroscience

Open access
Solms, Mark, Panksepp, Jaak·2012·Brain Sciences
DOI 10.3390/brainsci2020147PMC PMC4061793
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

It is commonly believed that consciousness is a higher brain function. Here we consider the likelihood, based on abundant neuroevolutionary data that lower brain affective phenomenal experiences provide the “energy” for the developmental construction of higher forms of cognitive consciousness. This view is concordant with many of the theoretical formulations of Sigmund Freud. In this reconceptualization, all of consciousness may be dependent on the original evolution of affective phenomenal experiences that coded survival values. These subcortical energies provided a foundation that could be used for the epigenetic construction of perceptual and other higher forms of consciousness. From this perspective, perceptual experiences were initially affective at the primary-process brainstem level, but capable of being elaborated by secondary learning and memory processes into tertiary-cognitive forms of consciousness. Within this view, although all individual neural activities are unconscious, perhaps along with secondary-process learning and memory mechanisms, the primal sub-neocortical networks of emotions and other primal affects may have served as the sentient scaffolding for the construction of resolved perceptual and higher mental activities within the neocortex. The data supporting this neuro-psycho-evolutionary vision of the emergence of mind is discussed in relation to classical psychoanalytical models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci2020147

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 55 references

6 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Freud, 1915, The Unconscious, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, volume 14, 166
  2. Freud, S. (1900). Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Hogarth.
  3. Freud, 1917, A Metapsychological Supplement to the Theory of Dreams, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, volume 14, 222
  4. Freud, 1923, The Ego and the Id, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, volume 19, 12
  5. Freud, 1915, Instincts and Their Vicissitudes, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, volume 14, 117
  6. Freud, S. (1916–1917). Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Hogarth.
  7. Freud, 1933, Introductory Lectures in Psychoanalysis, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, volume 22, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 250

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Solms, M., & Panksepp, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Solms, Mark
ORCID
Solms, Mark
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
147-175
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/brainsci2020147
PMC
PMC4061793
OpenAlex
W1968799970
Cited by
254
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
FWCI
27.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
consciousness, affective consciousness, neuropsychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, psychoanalytic theory, neuroevolution, emotions, emergence of mind, cognitive consciousness, perceptual consciousness, epigenetic development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review