CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moral Observer-Licensing in Cyberspace

Ran, Yawei, Hou, Yubo, Dong, Zhiwen, Wang, Qi·2022·Behavioral Sciences
DOI 10.3390/bs12050148

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Moral observer-licensing happens when observers condone actors’ morally questionable conduct due to the actors’ history of moral behaviors. In four studies (N = 808), we investigated this phenomenon in the context of cyberspace and its contributing factors and boundary conditions. The pilot study determined what participants perceived as typically moral and immoral behaviors in cyberspace. Then, in Study 1, participants condemned a story character’s online immoral behavior less often when they were informed of the character’s prior online moral behavior than when they were not, which indicates moral observer-licensing in cyberspace. Study 2 confirmed the presence of moral observer-licensing in cyberspace and further demonstrated that a character’s prior moral or immoral behavior online respectively reduces or intensifies the perceived negativity of the character’s subsequent immoral behavior. Finally, Study 3 showed that participants who identified with the victim in a hypothetical scenario showed less forgiveness and more condemnation of a character’s immoral behavior than those who identified with the perpetrator or the bystander. These findings are of theoretical and practical significance for our understanding of cyber ethics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bs12050148

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Miller, 2010, Psychological License: When it is needed and how it functions, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 43, 115, 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8 · DOI
  2. Khan, 2006, Licensing effect in consumer choice, J. Mark. Res., 43, 259, 10.1509/jmkr.43.2.259 · DOI
  3. Effron, 2009, Endorsing Obama licenses favoring whites, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 45, 590, 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.001 · DOI
  4. Merritt, 2010, Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad, Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass, 4, 344, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x · DOI
  5. King, 2010, Moral credentialing by association: The importance of choice and relationship closeness, Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 36, 1564, 10.1177/0146167210385920 · DOI
  6. Lin, 2016, When Ethical Leader Behavior Breaks Bad: How Ethical Leader Behavior: Can Turn Abusive via Ego Depletion and Moral Licensing, J. Appl. Psychol., 101, 815, 10.1037/apl0000098 · DOI
  7. Clot, 2018, Moral self-licencing and social dilemmas: An experimental analysis from a taking game in Madagascar, Appl. Econ., 50, 2980, 10.1080/00036846.2017.1412083 · DOI
  8. Schlegelmilcha, 2019, Moral licensing and moral cleansing applied to company-NGO collaborations in an online context, J. Bus. Res., 95, 544, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.040 · DOI
  9. Polman, 2013, Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 49, 614, 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.012 · DOI
  10. Hou, 2017, Socioeconomic status and online shaming: The mediating role of belief in a just world, Comput. Hum. Behav., 76, 19, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.003 · DOI
  11. Wang, 2019, Will you forgive your supervisor’s wrongdoings? the moral licensing effect of ethical leader behaviors, Front. Psychol., 10, 484, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00484 · DOI
  12. Merritt, 2012, The strategic pursuit of moral credentials, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 48, 774, 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.017 · DOI
  13. Mullen, 2016, Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 67, 363, 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120 · DOI
  14. Sachdeva, 2009, Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self regulation, Psychol. Sci., 20, 523, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x · DOI
  15. Klotz, 2013, Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view, Acad. Manag. Rev., 38, 292, 10.5465/amr.2011.0109 · DOI
  16. Wren, T.E. (1990). Moral balance: A model of how people arrive at moral decisions. The Moral Domain, MIT Press.
  17. Zhong, 2010, Compensatory ethics, J. Bus. Ethics, 92, 323, 10.1007/s10551-009-0161-6 · DOI
  18. Guan, 2017, Why Does Good Previously Lead into Bad Subsequently on the Employees? Based on the Theory Framework of Moral License, Foreign Econ. Manag., 39, 98
  19. Loi, 2020, From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance, J. Appl. Psychol., 105, 944, 10.1037/apl0000477 · DOI
  20. Krumm, 2008, Who believes us when we try to conceal our prejudices? The effectiveness of moral credentials with in-groups versus out-groups, J. Soc. Psychol., 148, 689, 10.3200/SOCP.148.6.689-710 · DOI
  21. Shi, 2011, A review of the research on moral psychological licensing, Adv. Psychol. Sci., 19, 1233
  22. Schmitt, 2005, Justice Sensitivity: Assessment and Location in the Personality Space, Eur. J. Psychol. Assess., 21, 202, 10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202 · DOI
  23. Mummendey, A. (1984). Aggression: From act to interaction, In Social Psychology of Aggression: From Individual Behavior to Social Interaction, Springer. · DOI
  24. Mikula, 1998, Does it only depend on the point of view? Perspective-related differences in justice evaluations of negative incidents in personal relationships, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 28, 931, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<931::AID-EJSP904>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  25. Traclet, 2008, Aggressor and victim perspective-related difference in perceived legitimacy of aggression in soccer, Percept. Mot. Ski., 106, 234, 10.2466/pms.106.1.234-240 · DOI
  26. Song, 2014, Harmed or not harmed? Culture in interpersonal transgression memory and self-acceptance, Int. J. Appl. Psychol., 4, 188
  27. Lawler, E.J. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press.
  28. Wainryb, C., and Recchia, H. (2014). “Did you apologize?” Moral talk in European American and Chinese immigrant mother-child conversations of peer experiences. Talking about Right and Wrong: Parent-Child Conversations as Contexts for Moral Development, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  29. Hogg, M.A., and Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes, Routledge.
  30. Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. (1990). Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, Springer.
  31. Messick, 1989, Intergroup relations, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 40, 45, 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000401 · DOI
  32. Benedikt, M. (1991). Cyberspace: Some proposals. Cyberspace, MIT Press.
  33. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society, Oxford University Press.
  34. Whittier, 2013, Cyberethics: Envisioning Character Education in Cyberspace, Peabody J. Educ., 88, 225, 10.1080/0161956X.2013.775882 · DOI
  35. Iten, 2018, Does a prosocial decision in video games lead to increased prosocial real-life behavior? The impact of reward and reasoning, Comput. Hum. Behav., 89, 163, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.031 · DOI
  36. Wang, 2019, The individual mind in the active construction of its digital niche, J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn., 8, 25, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.12.005 · DOI
  37. Wang, Q. (2021). The triangular self in the social media era. Memory, Mind & Media, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  38. Mckenna, 2000, Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology, Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 4, 57, 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 · DOI
  39. Blanken, 2015, A meta-analytic review of moral licensing, Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 41, 540, 10.1177/0146167215572134 · DOI
  40. Faul, 2009, Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1, Tests for correlation and regression analyses, Behav. Res. Methods, 41, 1149, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Benedikt, M. (1991). Will the real body please stand up? Boundary stories about virtual cultures. Cyberspace: First Steps, MIT Press.
  42. Guo, Y.J., and Wang, H. (2005). Cybersociology, China Renmin University Press.
  43. Xia, 2004, Construction of cybersociology, J. Peking Univ., 41, 85
  44. Frechen, N., and Brouwer, S. Wait, Did I Do That? Effects of Previous Decisions on Moral Decision-Making. J. Behav. Decis. Mak., 2022. · DOI
  45. Baumeister, 1990, Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 59, 994, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.994 · DOI
  46. Blanken, 2014, Three attempts to replicate the moral licensing effect, Soc. Psychol., 45, 232, 10.1027/1864-9335/a000189 · DOI
  47. Rotella, 2020, Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment, Personal. Individ. Differ., 161, 109967, 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109967 · DOI
  48. Urban, 2021, No Evidence of Within-Domain Moral Licensing in the Environmental Domain, Environ. Behav., 53, 1070, 10.1177/0013916520942604 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kuper, 2019, Has the evidence for moral licensing been inflated by publication bias?, Meta-Psychology, 3, 878, 10.15626/MP.2018.878 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Trope, 2010, Construal-level theory of psychological distance, Psychol. Rev., 117, 440, 10.1037/a0018963 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Pothos, 2017, Contemporary morality: Moral judgments in digital contexts, Comput. Hum. Behav., 75, 184, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020 · DOI
  52. Gilovich, T., and Ross, L. (2016). The Wisest One in the Room: How You Can Benefit from Social Psychology’s Most Powerful Insights, Free Press.
  53. Wang, Q., and Jeon, H.J. (2020). Bias in Bias Recognition: People View Others but not Themselves as Biased by Preexisting Beliefs and Social Stigmas. PLoS ONE, 15. · DOI
  54. Henrich, 2010, The weirdest people in the world?, Behav. Brain Sci., 33, 61, 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X · DOI · Paper page
  55. Wang, 2016, Why should we all be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 11, 583, 10.1177/1745691616645552 · DOI
  56. Wang, 2021, The cultural foundation of human memory, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 72, 151, 10.1146/annurev-psych-070920-023638 · DOI
  57. Polman, E., and Lu, Z.Y. (2021). Are people more selfish after giving gifts?. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. · DOI
  58. Kishore, 2022, A Virtual Reality Embodiment Technique to Enhance Helping Behavior of Police Towards a Victim of Police Racial Aggression, Virtual Augment. Real., 28, 5, 10.1162/pres_a_00339 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ran, Y., Hou, Y., Dong, Z., & Wang, Q.
Venue
Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-17
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
148
ISSN
2076-328X
DOI
10.3390/bs12050148
Cited by
1
References
3
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31528014, 31671159)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review