Cited by 13Mental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and Coping

Differences in help-seeking behavior among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic depending on mental health status: results from a cross-sectional survey

Open access
Guenthner, Lukas, Baldofski, Sabrina, Kohls, Elisabeth, Schuhr, Jan, Brock, Tanja, Rummel-Kluge, Christine·2023·Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that a significant proportion of university students are affected by mental disorders and suicidal ideation. Despite this, a treatment gap exists. Therefore, the present study assessed students' knowledge and past use of on- and off-campus mental health services and help-seeking intentions. Furthermore, resilience was investigated as a potential barrier to help-seeking behavior. METHODS: = 5510 students from Saxony, Germany. To compare dependent variables, subgroups were computed according to students' mental health status. Variables were assessed using standardized questionnaires. Chi-square tests were used for comparisons between groups. Multiple regression models were used to investigate the influence of resilience on help-seeking behavior. RESULTS: Between 34 and 38% (depending on the subgroup) of participants indicated that they were not aware of their universities' psychosocial counseling services. Furthermore, between 17 and 19% of participants indicated that they were not willing to seek help from professional mental health services. Finally, the previously found negative effect of resilience on help-seeking behavior was confirmed. CONCLUSION: The results showed a lack of awareness regarding universities' mental health services and a treatment gap among university students. Universities and healthcare providers need to educate students about mental health services and how to access them. Further research is needed to elucidate the differential impact of resilience on mental health and help-seeking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bs13110885

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Herbst U. Müller M. Voeth M. Eidhoff A.T. Stief S. Projektbericht Stressstudie Available online: https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/journal/2016/10/08_projektbericht_stressstudie.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2023)

Authors
Guenthner, L., Baldofski, S., Kohls, E., Schuhr, J., Brock, T., & Rummel-Kluge, C.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • Centre for Research, Further Education and Consulting, University of Applied Sciences for Social Work, Education and Nursing, 01307 Dresden, Germany
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Venue
Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-10-25
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
885
ISSN
2076-328X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387936640
Cited by
13
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Open-Access Publishing Fund of Leipzig University, supported by the German Research Foundation within the program Open-Access Publication Funding (100586917)
  • Saxon Ministry for Science, Culture and Tourism (100586917)
  • Saxon State Parliament (100586917)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
help-seeking, university students, COVID-19 pandemic, mental health status, resilience, treatment gap, suicidal ideation, help-seeking intentions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review