Cited by 5Structural Load-Bearing AnalysisStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Experimental Investigation and Analysis of Bond–Slip Behavior between Geopolymer Concrete and Steel Tube with Varying Structural Measures

Open access
Li, Dandan, Wu, Cuilian, Song, Hang, Li, Linchang, Lv, Guanru, Yang, Fei·2024·Buildings

Abstract

In this study, push-out tests were conducted on 20 specimens to explore the bond–slip performance of geopolymer concrete-filled steel tubes. The investigation focused on the effects of various design parameters such as length–diameter ratio, diameter–thickness ratio, concrete strength, and internal structural measures of the steel tube on the bond–slip performance. Analysis of the test phenomena, load–slip curves, and strain distribution curves of each specimen revealed insights into the shear strength calculation methods for welded stud structure and ring rib structure specimens. The results indicated a slight buckling deformation at the loading end of the steel tube in the structural specimen, while no significant deformation was observed in the non-structural specimen. The strain distribution along the height direction of the steel tube exhibited a triangular pattern, with the strain increasing gradually. Improvements in the interfacial bonding performance were noted with reductions in length–diameter ratio and diameter–thickness ratio of the steel tube, as well as increases in concrete strength. When the steel tube wall thickness t increases from 3.5 mm to 4.5 mm, the peak load of GC30-1 increases from 382.13 kN to 419.59 kN, an increase of 9.81%. After improving the concrete strength of GC30-1 and GC30-3 specimens, the peak load increases from 382.13 kN and 274.54 kN to 436.46 kN and 306.12 kN, respectively, an increase of 14.2% and 11.5%. Furthermore, the welding structure of the steel tube significantly enhanced the shear bearing capacity of the interface. The ratio of load calculation value to test value fell within the range of 0.917 to 1.098, indicating good agreement between the calculated and experimental values. These research results can provide reference for engineering applications of geopolymer concrete.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/buildings14082516

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The strain distribution on the surface of the steel tube during the push-out process reflects the transfer effect of the bonding force between the RAC and the steel tube, namely the cooperative working performance of the two.

    “The strain distribution on the surface of the steel tube during the push-out process reflects the transfer effect of the bonding force between the RAC and the steel tube, namely the cooperative working performance of the two [44].”

    From Investigation on the bond-slip behavior of recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tube with studs (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    Section 3.3 (page unavailable) explains that bond stress transfers force from the core concrete to the steel tube and relates that transfer to the measured tube strains. The paper studies geopolymer concrete, however, not the recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) specified in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Han, L. Concrete Filled Steel Tube Structure-Theory and Practice; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
  2. GB/T 2975-2018; Sampling Position and Sample Preparation for the Mechanical Properties Test of Steel and Steel Products. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  3. GB/T 228.1-2010; Method of Room Temperature Tensile Test of Metal Materials. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2010.
  4. Design Code of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridge. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, D., Wu, C., Song, H., Li, L., Lv, G., & Yang, F.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University of Economics and Business (CN)
  • Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Zhongyuan University of Technology (CN)
  • Ruyang County Gongxin Logistics Management, Luoyang 471200, China
Corresponding author
Yang, Fei
Venue
Buildings
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-08-15
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
2516
ISSN
2075-5309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401615077
Cited by
5
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Buildings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Discipline Young Master Tutor Program of Zhongyuan University of Technology (SD202425)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
geopolymer concrete, concrete-filled steel tubes, bond-slip behavior, push-out test, shear strength, length-to-diameter ratio, diameter-to-thickness ratio, steel tube wall thickness, concrete strength, interfacial bonding, load-slip curves, strain distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review