Co-Creating Restorative Urban Public Parks: Integrating Attention Restoration Theory and Urban Public Space Design Criteria: A Case Study in Erbil City
Open accessAbstract
Urban parks play a crucial role in shaping the well-being of the community. This study integrated environmental psychology and co-creation to develop psychologically informed park design. It examined users’ psychological reactions to urban parks to establish a theoretically grounded framework for participatory design. Hence, this study integrated Attention Restorative Theory (ART) with co-creation approaches to provide conceptual clarity on translating psychological constructs into design criteria. The primary objective was to identify and rank design criteria within this integrated framework to meet user psychological demands. Also, it is hypothesized that ART could be applied through a co-creation approach. Specifically, this study administered ART scale questionnaires to 202 community members in Erbil City, and the data were analyzed using statistical analysis to provide empirical evidence for incorporating these psychological dimensions into the co-creation process. The findings reveal that validated measurement of community needs enhances participatory design effectiveness. Furthermore, the high inter-factor correlations (r = 0.79–0.88) suggest that holistic design approaches address multiple restorative dimensions simultaneously. Overall, this research demonstrates how environmental psychology can be systematically integrated into co-creation processes, thereby bridging theory and practice in urban park design. The validated framework provides practitioners with evidence-based tools for psychologically informed participatory design environments that can activate users mentally and improve cognitive function.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923 · see citing works
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315827506 · Cited by 4,546 · see citing works
An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis
Kline, P. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315788135 · Cited by 3,328 · see citing works
Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance
Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., de Vries, S., Triguero-Mas, M., Brauer, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., et al. (2017) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028 · Cited by 2,543 · see citing works
Ohly, H., White, M. P., Wheeler, B. W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Nikolaou, V., & Garside, R. (2016) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155 · Cited by 961 · see citing works
A measure of restorative quality in environments.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997) · Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research · doi:10.1080/02815739708730435 · Cited by 916 · see citing works
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. B. (2013) · Island Press/Center for Resource Economics eBooks · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Mehta, V. (2013) · Journal of Urban Design · doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854698 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Assessing the restorative components of environments
Herzog, T. R., Colleen, Maguire, P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00113-5 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments
Thornicroft, G., Deb, T., & Henderson, C. (2016) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20349 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
The ‘15-Minute City’ concept can shape a net-zero urban future
Allam, Z., Bibri, S. E., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01145-0 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Nguyen, P., Astell‐Burt, T., Rahimi‐Ardabili, H., & Feng, X. (2023) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00025-6 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
More green, less lonely? A longitudinal cohort study
Astell‐Burt, T., Hartig, T., Eckermann, S. D., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., McMunn, A., Frumkin, H., & Feng, X. (2021) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyab089 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Razani, N., Morshed, S., Kohn, M. A., Wells, N. M., Thompson, D., Alqassari, M., Agodi, A., & Rutherford, G. W. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192921 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Community mental health team management in severe mental illness: A systematic review
Simmonds, S., Coid, J., Joseph, P. L. A., Marriott, S., & Petertyrer (2001) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.178.6.497 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Rasul, A., Balzter, H., & Smith, C. L. (2016) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli4030042 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Impact of Changed Use of Greenspace during COVID-19 Pandemic on Depression and Anxiety
Heo, S., Desai, M. U., Lowe, S. R., & Bell, M. L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115842 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Gupta, A., Yadav, M. A., & Nayak, B. K. (2025) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci9060181 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Designing for possibility in public space: affordance, assemblage, and ANT
Stevens, Q., Daly, J., & Dovey, K. (2024) · URBAN DESIGN International · doi:10.1057/s41289-023-00235-y · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Li, W., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04064-4 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Niu, H., & Chen, M.-J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877365 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Restorative Effects of Urban Parks on Stress Control Ability and Community Attachment
Jang, E., Choi, H. B., & Kim, M.-H. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16052113 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Jin, T., Lu, J., & Shao, Y. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13091468 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Wu, J., Zhang, L., & Ren, X. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191912908 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Dalavong, P., Im, H. N., & Choi, C. G. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394930 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Towards Resilient and Inclusive Cities: A Framework for Sustainable Street-Level Urban Design
Sádaba, J., Alonso, Y., Zaballos, I. L., & Iturrioz, A. L. (2024) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci8040264 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Weng, Y., Chen, Q., Lin, X., Chi, Y., & Li, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1667502 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sepe, M. (2025) · URBAN DESIGN International · doi:10.1057/s41289-024-00263-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Rennit, P., & Maikov, K. (2015) · City Territory and Architecture · doi:10.1186/s40410-014-0020-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Integrative literature review on co-concepts in connection with nature-based solutions
Sarkki, S., Pihlajamäki, M., Soini, K., Ojala, A., Kluvánková, T., Špaček, M., Mishra, H. S., & Hiedanpää, J. (2025) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104073 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
What makes a public open space liveable?
Dietrich, U., & Kengyel, N. (2016) · WIT transactions on ecology and the environment · doi:10.2495/sc160571 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Azeez, S. A., Mustafa, F. A., & Ahmad, R. M. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13081999 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, D., Xie, S., Su, R., & Wu, W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19451-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Oetken, K. J. (2025) · Sustainable communities. · doi:10.1080/29931282.2025.2477788 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Perceived restorativeness of urban green spaces in southern China during summer
Chen, L., & Ma, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-22382-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Gendeshmin, S. R., Khanghahi, T. H., & Rostamzadeh, Y. (2023) · Open House International · doi:10.1108/ohi-10-2022-0264 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Research on Co-Creation of Community Public Cultural Spaces Through Generative Dynamic Workflows
Liu, C., Zhong, M., He, M., Wang, X., Gan, H., Cao, P., Wang, C., & Lou, Y. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13050316 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Measuring restoration quality in urban forest greenways: insights for planning and management
Wang, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., & Wang, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1596154 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Geirbo, H. C., Harboe, L., Hoelscher, K., & Petersen, S. A. (2022) · Nordic Journal of Urban Studies · doi:10.18261/njus.2.2.4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Guo, J., & Kwon, H.-I. (2025) · Land · doi:10.3390/land14051097 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Evaluation and the evidence base for co-creation
Fox, C., Bassi, A., & Baines, S. (2024) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.56687/9781447367185-012 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Designing Public Buildings for Everyday Participation Among People with Social Anxiety
Li, P., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings16204120
- Authors
- Azeez, S. A., & Majid, Z. K.
- Affiliations
- Salahaddin University-Erbil (IQ)
- Corresponding author
- Azeez, Sweyda Abdullah
- Venue
- Buildings
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-02-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 769
- ISSN
- 2075-5309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7128785823
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Buildings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
- Keywords
- urban public parks, attention restoration theory, co-creation, participatory design, environmental psychology, restorative environments, Erbil, cognitive function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review