The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Bibliographic Review
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we first describe the basics of the field of cancer diagnosis, which includes steps of cancer diagnosis followed by the typical classification methods used by doctors, providing a historical idea of cancer classification techniques to the readers. These methods include Asymmetry, Border, Color and Diameter (ABCD) method, seven-point detection method, Menzies method, and pattern analysis. They are used regularly by doctors for cancer diagnosis, although they are not considered very efficient for obtaining better performance. Moreover, considering all types of audience, the basic evaluation criteria are also discussed. The criteria include the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, dice-coefficient, average accuracy, and Jaccard index. Previously used methods are considered inefficient, asking for better and smarter methods for cancer diagnosis. Artificial intelligence and cancer diagnosis are gaining attention as a way to define better diagnostic tools. In particular, deep neural networks can be successfully used for intelligent image analysis. The basic framework of how this machine learning works on medical imaging is provided in this study, i.e., pre-processing, image segmentation and post-processing. The second part of this manuscript describes the different deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial models (GANs), deep autoencoders (DANs), restricted Boltzmann’s machine (RBM), stacked autoencoders (SAE), convolutional autoencoders (CAE), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory (LTSM), multi-scale convolutional neural network (M-CNN), multi-instance learning convolutional neural network (MIL-CNN). For each technique, we provide Python codes, to allow interested readers to experiment with the cited algorithms on their own diagnostic problems. The third part of this manuscript compiles the successfully applied deep learning models for different types of cancers. Considering the length of the manuscript, we restrict ourselves to the discussion of breast cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and skin cancer. The purpose of this bibliographic review is to provide researchers opting to work in implementing deep learning and artificial neural networks for cancer diagnosis a knowledge from scratch of the state-of-the-art achievements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2016) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21332 · Cited by 16,003
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation
Milletari, F., Navab, N., & Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016) · 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.79 · Cited by 11,931
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
Aerts, H. J. W. L., Velazquez, E. R., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., Haibe-Kains, B., Rietveld, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 · Cited by 5,132
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · cited 1×
“Adjacent image patches were joined together into one pass using a dense training scheme in the CNN model [81].”
MethodBrain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V., & Silva, C. A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2538465 · Cited by 2,735
Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential
Doi, K. (2007) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.002 · Cited by 1,855
Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Litjens, G., Gerke, P., Jacobs, C., van Riel, S. J., Wille, M. M. W., Naqibullah, M., Sanchez, C. I., & van Ginneken, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2536809 · Cited by 1,258
Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge
Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., et al. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002 · Cited by 857
AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images
Albarqouni, S., Baur, C., Achilles, F., Belagiannis, V., Demirci, S., & Navab, N. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528120 · Cited by 606
Horie, Y., Yoshio, T., Aoyama, K., Yoshimizu, S., Horiuchi, Y., Ishiyama, A., Hirasawa, T., Tsuchida, T., Ozawa, T., Ishihara, S., et al. (2019) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.037 · Cited by 467
Decision Forests for Tissue-Specific Segmentation of High-Grade Gliomas in Multi-channel MR
Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Konukoglu, E., Criminisi, A., Demiralp, C., Shotton, J., Thomas, O. M., Das, T., Jena, R., & Price, S. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_46 · Cited by 276
Multimodal Deep Learning for Cervical Dysplasia Diagnosis
Xu, T., Zhang, H., Huang, X., Zhang, S., & Metaxas, D. N. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_14 · Cited by 187
Brain Tumour Segmentation based on Extremely Randomized Forest with high-level features
Pinto, A., Pereira, S., Correia, H., Oliveira, J., Rasteiro, D. M. L. D., & Silva, C. A. (2015) · 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7319032 · Cited by 108
Cited by
A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in cancer prediction and diagnosis
Kumar, Y., Gupta, S., Singla, R., & Hu, Y.-C. (2022) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-021-09648-w · Cited by 223
Melarkode, N., Srinivasan, K., Qaisar, S. M., & Plawiak, P. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15041183 · Cited by 144
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer
Chiu, H.-Y., Chao, H.-S., & Chen, Y.-M. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14061370 · Cited by 138
A bird's-eye view of deep learning in bioimage analysis
Meijering, E. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.003 · Cited by 126
Tonozuka, R., Itoi, T., Nagata, N., Kojima, H., Sofuni, A., Tsuchiya, T., Ishii, K., Tanaka, R., Nagakawa, Y., & Mukai, S. (2021) · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbp.825 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Munir, K., Elahi, H., Ayub, A., Frezza, F., & Rizzi, A.
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-08-23
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1235
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969790209
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 24.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
