Cited by 46Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications

In Vivo and In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Doxorubicin-loaded DNA-AuNP Nanocarrier for the Ovarian Cancer Treatment

Open access
Lee, Chang-Seuk, Kim, Tae, Oh, Da, Bae, Su, Ryu, Jaesung, Kong, Hyejeong, Jeon, Hyeji, Seo, Hee, Jeon, Seob, Kim, Tae·2020·Cancers

Abstract

In this study, we have determined the anticancer activity of doxorubicin (Dox)-loaded DNA/gold nanoparticle (AuNP) nanocarrier (Dox-DNA-AuNP) for the treatment of ovarian cancer. The anticancer effect of Dox-DNA-AuNP was evaluated in vitro using the EZ-Cytox cell viability assay on three human ovarian cancer cell lines, SK-OV-3, HEY A8, and A2780. Dox-DNA-AuNP exhibited outstanding activity with good IC50 values of 4.8, 7.4, and 7.6 nM for SK-OV-3, HEY A8, and A2780, respectively. In vivo evaluation further demonstrated the superior anticancer effects of Dox-DNA-AuNP by inhibiting tumor growth compared to free Dox in an established SK-OV-3 xenograft mice model. Dox-DNA-AuNP showed about a 2.5 times higher tumor growth inhibition rate than free Dox. Furthermore, the immunohistochemical analysis of Ki67 antigen expression showed the lowest number of proliferative cells in the ovarian tumor tissue treated with Dox-DNA-AuNP. These results suggest Dox-DNA-AuNP might be a potential effective agent in ovarian cancer chemotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers12030634

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monolayer systems fall short in predicting in vivo therapeutic efficacy despite their utility in mechanistic studies and target validation.

    “However, despite their utility in mechanistic studies and target validation, these models fall short in predicting in vivo therapeutic efficacy.”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [170]

    The Methods (§3.6) describe in vitro cell-viability tests, and the Results (§2.5) report therapeutic effects in mice. Searches for monolayer models, mechanistic studies, target validation, and prediction of in vivo efficacy found no passage assessing whether monolayer systems can predict those effects. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Numerous anticancer compounds that demonstrate robust activity in monolayer cultures fail to reproduce such outcomes in vivo.

    “Numerous anticancer compounds that demonstrate robust activity in monolayer cultures fail to reproduce such outcomes in vivo [168,169,170,171].”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [170]

    Sections 2.4 and 2.5 examine one doxorubicin nanocarrier in cultured ovarian cancer cells and in mice; they report anticancer activity in vivo. Neither section addresses whether numerous compounds active in monolayer cultures fail to reproduce those results in vivo. Searches for that comparison and for monolayer-culture limitations found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Cree I.A. Cancer Cell Culture: Methods and Protocols Humana Press Totowa, NJ, USA 2016 978-1-4939-5657-9

Authors
Lee, C.-S., Kim, T., Oh, D., Bae, S., Ryu, J., Kong, H., Jeon, H., Seo, H., Jeon, S., & Kim, T.
Affiliations
  • Soonchunhyang University (KR)
  • Department of Medical Life Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea
Corresponding author
Jeon, Seob
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
634
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010160178
Cited by
46
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (2019002800001)
  • Soonchunhyang University (000000000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
doxorubicin, ovarian cancer, drug delivery, nanoparticle drug delivery, tumor growth inhibition, Ki-67 proliferation index, SKOV3 cells, A2780 cells, xenograft tumor model, chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review