Cited by 131Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

FusionM4Net: a multi-stage multi-modal learning algorithm for multi-label skin lesion classification

Tang, Peng, Yan, Xintong, Nan, Yang, Xiang, Shao, Krammer, Sebastian, Lasser, Tobias·2022·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Skin disease is one of the most common diseases in the world. Deep learning-based methods have achieved excellent skin lesion recognition performance, most of which are based on only dermoscopy images. In recent works that use multi-modality data (patient's meta-data, clinical images, and dermoscopy images), the methods adopt a one-stage fusion approach and only optimize the information fusion at the feature level. These methods do not use information fusion at the decision level and thus cannot fully use the data of all modalities. This work proposes a novel two-stage multi-modal learning algorithm (FusionM4Net) for multi-label skin diseases classification. At the first stage, we construct a FusionNet, which exploits and integrates the representation of clinical and dermoscopy images at the feature level, and then uses a Fusion Scheme 1 to conduct the information fusion at the decision level. At the second stage, to further incorporate the patient's meta-data, we propose a Fusion Scheme 2, which integrates the multi-label predictive information from the first stage and patient's meta-data information to train an SVM cluster. The final diagnosis is formed by the fusion of the predictions from the first and second stages. Our algorithm was evaluated on the seven-point checklist dataset, a well-established multi-modality multi-label skin disease dataset. Without using the patient's meta-data, the proposed FusionM4Net's first stage (FusionM4Net-FS) achieved an average accuracy of 75.7% for multi-classification tasks and 74.9% for diagnostic tasks, which is more accurate than other state-of-the-art methods. By further fusing the patient's meta-data at FusionM4Net's second stage (FusionM4Net-SS), the entire FusionM4Net finally boosts the average accuracy to 77.0% and the diagnostic accuracy to 78.5%, which indicates its robust and excellent classification performance on the label-imbalanced dataset. The corresponding code is available at: https://github.com/pixixiaonaogou/MLSDR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2021.102307

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, P., Yan, X., Nan, Y., Xiang, S., Krammer, S., & Lasser, T.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Tang, Peng
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
76
Pages
102307
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215150387
Cited by
131
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (2520DAT920)
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
skin lesion classification, multi-label classification, multimodal learning, dermoscopic images, decision fusion, feature-level fusion, two-stage fusion, label imbalance, dermatological diagnosis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Skin Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review