Cited by 3Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCancer survivorship and carePain Management and Opioid Use

Severity of Symptoms as an Independent Predictor of Poor Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Cancer Presenting to the Emergency Department: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Study

Open access
Qdaisat, Aiham, Stroh, Elizabeth, Reyes-Gibby, Cielito, Wattana, Monica K., Viets-Upchurch, Jayne, Li, Ziyi, Page, Valda D., Fatima, Huda +2 more·2024·Cancers

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Patients with advanced cancer often present to the emergency department (ED) with pain and distressing symptoms that are not systematically evaluated. The current study investigated the association of symptom severity with the diagnosis of delirium and short-term survival. Methods: In this secondary analysis of a prospective randomized study of delirium among advanced cancer patients in the ED, in which symptoms were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), we analyzed the distribution of MDASI item scores by 90-day mortality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov), the association of MDASI item scores with short-term mortality (logistic regression models), and the symptoms in those with or without delirium (Mann–Whitney U test or chi-square test). Results: Of the 243 patients included, 222 (91.4%) had complete MDASI scores. The MDASI median symptom scores for pain, fatigue, and interference with work were the highest. A significant difference in MDASI item score distribution with 90-day mortality was observed for fatigue (p = 0.018), shortness of breath (p < 0.001), difficulty remembering (p = 0.038), lack of appetite (p = 0.035), drowsiness (p < 0.001), feeling sad (p = 0.031), and interference with walking (p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models, shortness of breath (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04–1.26, p = 0.005) and drowsiness (adjusted OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05–1.33, p = 0.008) were associated with 90-day mortality, adjusting for age, race, performance status, and cancer type. The median total MDASI score was significantly higher in patients with delirium than in those without (88, IQR 83–118 vs. 80, IQR 55–104; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer presenting to the ED had severe symptoms, some of which were associated with shorter survival. These findings underscore the necessity of systematic symptom assessment, focusing on shortness of breath, drowsiness, fatigue, difficulty remembering, lack of appetite, feeling sad, and feeling distressed, to enhance clinical decision-making and improve the care of patients with advanced cancer. Additional longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the improvement in symptoms and quality of life for these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers16233988

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High caregiver distress is associated with poorer quality of care, greater unplanned health care use, and higher caregiver symptom burden.

    “High caregiver distress is associated with poorer quality of care, 16 greater unplanned health care use, 114 , 115 and higher caregiver symptom burden. 116”

    From Nonpharmacologic interventions for managing distress, anxiety, and depression for patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [115]

    The citation appears to support the clause about greater unplanned health care use. The Introduction discusses ED visits and hospitalization among patients with advanced cancer, but does not link that use to caregiver distress. A search for caregiver distress and health care use found no passage establishing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qdaisat, A., Stroh, E., Reyes-Gibby, C., Wattana, M. K., Viets-Upchurch, J., Li, Z., Page, V. D., Fatima, H., Chaftari, P., & Elsayem, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Corresponding author
Elsayem, Ahmed
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-28
Volume
16
Issue
23
Pages
3988
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404828342
Cited by
3
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
advanced cancer, emergency department presentation, symptom severity, delirium, 90-day mortality, dyspnea, sleepiness, fatigue, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, symptom assessment, prognostic factors, short-term survival, pain, appetite loss, performance status, cancer pain management, palliative care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review