Cited by 53Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

A Review of Apps for Calming, Relaxation, and Mindfulness Interventions for Pediatric Palliative Care Patients

Open access
Weekly, Taelyr, Walker, Nicole, Beck, Jill, Akers, Sean, Weaver, Meaghann·2018·Children

Abstract

Patients and families increasingly use mobile apps as a relaxation and distraction intervention for children with complex, chronic medical conditions in the waiting room setting or during inpatient hospitalizations; and yet, there is limited data on app quality assessment or review of these apps for level of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, or applicability for palliative pediatric patients. The pediatric palliative care study team searched smartphone application platforms for apps relevant to calming, relaxation, and mindfulness for pediatric and adolescent patients. Apps were reviewed using a systematic data extraction tool. Validated Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) scores were determined by two blinded reviewers. Apps were then characterized by infant, child, adolescent, and adult caregiver group categories. Reviewer discussion resulted in consensus. Sixteen of the 22 apps identified were included in the final analysis. The apps operated on either iOS or Android platforms. All were available in English with four available in Spanish. Apps featured a relaxation approach (12/16), soothing images (8/16), and breathing techniques (8/16). Mood and sleep patterns were the main symptoms targeted by apps. Provision of mobile apps resource summary has the potential to foster pediatric palliative care providers’ knowledge of app functionality and applicability as part of ongoing patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/children5020016

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MARS scores in [38] are for general tinnitus apps such as Beltone Tinnitus Calmer, Relax Noise 3, ReSound Relief, myNoise, Tinnitus Therapy (Lite), and White Noise (Lite), while MARS scores in [52] are for mindfulness and cognitive behavior therapy apps such as Relax Melodies and MindShift CBT.

    “The MARS scores in [38] are for general tinnitus apps such as Beltone Tinnitus Calmer, Relax Noise 3, ReSound Relief, myNoise, Tinnitus Therapy (Lite), and White Noise (Lite), while MARS scores in [52] are given for mindfulness and cognitive behavior therapy apps such as Relax Melodies and MindShift CBT.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Breathe, Think, Do with Sesame version 1.5.7 Sesame Workshop New York, NY, USA 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weekly, T., Walker, N., Beck, J., Akers, S., & Weaver, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Hospital & Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Weaver, Meaghann
Venue
Children
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-01-26
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
16
ISSN
2227-9067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2282652809
Cited by
53
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
mobile health apps, pediatric palliative care, relaxation intervention, mindfulness, app quality assessment, breathing exercises, children and adolescents, caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review