Cited by 106Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effectiveness of Mindfulness- and Relaxation-Based eHealth Interventions for Patients with Medical Conditions: a Systematic Review and Synthesis

Mikolasek, Michael, Berg, Jonas, Witt, Claudia M., Barth, Jürgen·2018·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Purpose This systematic review aims to summarize eHealth studies with mindfulness- and relaxation-based interventions for medical conditions and to determine whether eHealth interventions have positive effects on health.Method A comprehensive search of five databases was conducted for all available studies from 1990 to 2015. Studies were included if the intervention was mainly technology delivered and included a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention strategy and if patients with a medical condition were treated. Treatment effects were summarized for different outcomes.Results A total of 2383 records were identified, of which 17 studies with 1855 patients were included in this systematic review. These studies were conducted in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, cancer, chronic pain, surgery, and hypertension. All but one study were delivered online through a web-based platform; one study delivered the intervention with iPods. The studies indicate that mindfulness- and relaxation-based eHealth interventions can have positive effects on patients' general health and psychological well-being. No effects were found for stress or mindfulness. Only five studies reported economic analyses of eHealth interventions without any clear conclusion.Conclusion There is some evidence that mindfulness- and relaxation-based eHealth interventions for medical conditions can have positive effects on health outcomes. Therefore, such interventions might be a useful addition to standard medical care. No app studies were retrieved, even though a vast number of smartphone apps exist which aim at increasing users' health. Therefore, more studies investigating those health apps are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12529-017-9679-7

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mikolasek, M., Berg, J., Witt, C. M., & Barth, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Mikolasek, Michael
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2017-07-27
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W2739798346
Cited by
105
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Krebsliga Schweiz (KLS-3564-02-2015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, digital health interventions, online intervention, health conditions, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, cancer, chronic pain, hypertension, psychological well-being, stress, mobile health apps, economic evaluation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Relaxation Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Telemedicine, Chronic Pain, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review