Recent Trends of Sunscreen Cosmetic: An Update Review
Open accessAbstract
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation has been demonstrated to cause skin disorders, including sunburn and relative symptoms of prolonged exposure. It has been reported that sunscreens have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of skin disorders (sunburn, skin aging, and immunosuppression) through their ability to absorb, reflect, and scatter UV. Many commercial products have recently been manufactured from not only usual organic and inorganic UV filters, but also hybrid and botanical ingredients using typical formulations (emulsion, gel, aerosol, and stick). Particularly, these products have been supplemented with several preeminent properties to protect against the negative effects of not only UVB, but also UVA. However, the use of sunscreen has faced many challenges, including inducing photoallergic dermatitis, environment pollution, and deficiency of vitamin D production. Therefore, consumers should efficiently apply suitable products to improve sun protection. as well as to avoid the side effects of sunscreen.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sunscreens can induce side effects such as irritation, allergy and phototoxic reactions, affect the synthesis of vitamin D, generate reactive oxygen species and act as photosensitizers.
“Sunscreens can induce side effects such as irritation, allergy and phototoxic reactions, affect the synthesis of vitamin D, generate reactive oxygen species and act as photosensitizers (DiNardo and Downs 2018;Ngoc et al. 2019;Neale et al. 2019;Passeron et al. 2019;Narla and Lim 2020;Suh et al. 2020).”
From Skin protection from solar ultraviolet radiation using natural compounds: a review (2024) · cites this paper as Ngoc et al. 2019
Section 2.5 reports contact sensitivity, photoallergic dermatitis, and a possible reduction in vitamin D production from sunscreen use, while noting conflicting findings on vitamin D. Section 2.2 says sunscreen nanoparticles can produce reactive oxygen species. The review does not establish phototoxic reactions or that sunscreens act as photosensitizers; the latter term appears in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 75 · Cited by 168
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- Hidaka, H.; Horikoshi, S.; Serpone, N.; Knowland, J. In vitro photochemical damage to DNA, RNA and their bases by an inorganic sunscreen agent on exposure to UVA and UVB radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1997, 111, 205-213. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Juzeniene, A.; Moan, J. Beneficial effects of UV radiation other than via vitamin D production. Dermato-Endocrinol. 2012, 4, 109-117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Bintsis, T.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E.; Davies, R.; Robinson, R.K. The antimicrobial effects of long-wave ultra-violet light and furocoumarins on some micro-organisms that occur in cheese brines. Food Microbiol. 2000, 17, 687-695. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fleury, N.; Geldenhuys, S.; Gorman, S. Sun exposure and its effects on human health: Mechanisms through which sun exposure could reduce the risk of developing obesity and cardiometabolic dysfunction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 999. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Weller, R.B. Sunlight has cardiovascular benefits independently of vitamin D. Blood Purif. 2016, 41, 130-134. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Taylor, B.R. Ultraviolet radiation and the eye: An epidemiologic study. Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc. 1989, 87, 802.
- Hitchin, V.M.; Withrow, T.J.; Olvey, K.M.; Harleston, B.A.; Ellingson, O.L.; Bostrom, A.R.G. The cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of UVA radiation on L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1986, 44, 53-57. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sambandan, D.R.; Ratner, D. Sunscreens: An overview and update. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011, 64, 748-758. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Manikrao Donglikar, M.; Laxman Deore, S. Sunscreens: A review. Pharmacogn. J. 2016, 8, 171-179. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Palm, M.D.; O'Donoghue, M.N. Update on photoprotection. Dermatol. Ther. 2007, 20, 360-376. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Singer, S.; Karrer, S.; Berneburg, M. Modern sun protection. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2019, 46, 24-28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Mistry, N. Guidelines for formulating anti-pollution products. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 57. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ham, W.T.; Mueller, H.A.; Sliney, D.H. Retinal sensitivity to damage from short wavelength light. Nature 1976, 260, 153-155. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schieke, S.M.; Schroeder, P.; Krutmann, J. Cutaneous effects of infrared radiation: From clinical observations to molecular response mechanisms. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2003, 19, 228-234. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schalka, S.; Reis, V.M.S.d. Sun protection factor: Meaning and controversies. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2011, 86, 507-515. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Osterwalder, U.; Herzog, B. Sun protection factors: World wide confusion. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009, 161, 13-24. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Moyal, D. UVA protection labeling and in vitro testing methods. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2010, 9, 516-523. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wang, S.Q.; Stanfield, J.W.; Osterwalder, U. In vitro assessments of UVA protection by popular sunscreens available in the United States. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2008, 59, 934-942. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Lademann, J.; Schanzer, S.; Jacobi, U.; Schaefer, H.; Pflucker, F.; Driller, H.; Beck, J.; Meinke, M.; Roggan, A.; Sterry, W. Synergy effects between organic and inorganic UV filters in sunscreens. J. Biomed. Opt. 2005, 10, 14008. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Vergou, T.; Patzelt, A.; Richter, H.; Schanzer, S.; Zastrow, L.; Golz, K.; Doucet, O.; Antoniou, C.; Sterry, W.; Lademann, J. Transfer of ultraviolet photon energy into fluorescent light in the visible path represents a new and efficient protection mechanism of sunscreens. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011, 16, 105001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Latha, M.S.; Martis, J.; Shobha, V.; Shinde, R.S.; Banera, S.; Krishnankutty, B.; Bellary, S.; Varughese, S.; Rao, P.; Kumar, B.R.N. Sunscreening agents. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 2013, 6, 16-26. [PubMed]
- Serpone, N.; Dondi, D.; Albini, A. Inorganic and organic UV filters: Their role and efficacy in sunscreens and sun care products. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 794-802. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Pathak, M.A. Sunscreens: Topical and systemic approaches for protection of human skin against harmful effects of solar radiation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1982, 7, 285-311. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Siller, A.; Blaszark, S.C.; Lazar, M. Update about the effects of the sunscreen ingredients oxybenzone and octinoxate on humans and the environment. Plast. Surg. Nurs. 2018, 38, 158-161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Karlsson, I.; Hillerstrom, L.; Stenfeldt, A.-L.; Mårtensson, J.; Borje, A. Photodegradation of dibenzoylmethanes: Potential cause of photocontact allergy to sunscreens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 1881-1892. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gaspar, L.R.; Maia Campos, P.M.B.G. Evaluation of the photostability of different UV filter combinations in a sunscreen. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 307, 123-128. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Smijs, T.G.; Pavel, S. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: Focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2011, 4, 95-112. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Giacomoni, P.U. Sun Protection in Man; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; Volume 3, pp. 495-519.
- Schroeder, P.; Lademann, J.; Darvin, M.E.; Stege, H.; Marks, C.; Bruhnke, S.; Krutmann, J. Infrared radiation-induced matrix metalloproteinase in human skin: Implications for protection. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2491-2497. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Addor, F.A.S. Antioxidants in dermatology. An. Bra. Dermatol. 2017, 92, 356-362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Pouillot, A.; Polla, L.L.; Tacchini, P.; Neequaye, A.; Polla, A.; Polla, B. Natural antioxidants and their effects on the skin. In Formulating, Packaging, and Marketing of Natural Cosmetic Products; Dayan, N., Kromidas, L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 239-257.
- Anitha, D.; Reddy, K.Y.; Venkatesh, P.; Raani, M.J. A review-herbal sunscreen agents on skin protection. Eur. J. Pharm. Med. Res. 2016, 3, 308-313.
- Sopyan, I.; Gozali, D.; Tiassetiana, S. Formulation of tomato extracts (Solanum lycopersicum L.) as a sunscreen lotion. Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 453-458. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Afaq, F.; Zaid, M.A.; Khan, N.; Dreher, M.; Mukhtar, H. Protective effect of pomegranate-derived products on UVB-mediated damage in human reconstituted skin. Exp. Dermatol. 2009, 18, 553-561. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Katiyar, S.K.; Elmets, C.A. Green tea polyphenolic antioxidants and skin photoprotection (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2001, 18, 1307-1313.
- Maheshwar, G.H.; Patil, B.S.; Prashant, D. Comparative sun protection factor determination fo fresh fruits extract of cucumber vs marketed cosmetic formulation. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 55-59.
- Shenoy, P.; Khot, S.; Chavan, M.; Takawale, J.; Singh, S. Study of sunscreen activity of aqueous, methanol and acetone extracts of leaves of Pongamia pinnata (L.) pierre, fabaceae. Int. J. Green Pharm. 2010, 4, 270. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Patil, V.; Patil, S.B.; Kondawar, M.S.; Naikwade, N.S.; Magdum, C.S. Study of methanolic extract of flower of Spathodea campanulata L. as an anti-solar. Int. J. Green Pharm. 2009, 3, 248. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Park, K.; Choi, H.S.; Hong, Y.H.; Jung, E.Y.; Suh, H.J. Cactus cladodes (Opuntia humifusa) extract minimizes the effects of UV irradiation on keratinocytes and hairless mice. Pharm.Biol. 2017, 55, 1032-1040. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Hyun, T.K.; Ko, Y.-J.; Kim, E.-H.; Chung, I.-M.; Kim, J.-S. Anti-inflammatory activity and phenolic composition of Dendropanax morbifera leaf extracts. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 263-270. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chen, L.; Hu, J.Y.; Wang, S.Q. The role of antioxidants in photoprotection: A critical review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012, 67, 1013-1024. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
- McVean, M.; Liebler, D.C. Prevention of DNA photodamage by vitamin E compounds and sunscreens: Roles of ultraviolet absorbance and cellular uptake. Mol. Carcinog. 1999, 24, 169-176. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Dzialo, M.; Mierziak, J.; Korzun, U.; Preisner, M.; Szopa, J.; Kulma, A. The potential of plant phenolics in prevention and therapy of skin disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 160. [CrossRef] · DOI
- José, M.T.d.A.F.; Pedrita, A.S.; Emanuella, C.V.P.; Raimundo, G.d.O.J.; Fabrício, S.S.; Jackson, R.G.d.S.A.; Larissa, A.R.; Xirley, P.N.; Edigênia, C.d.C.A. Flavonoids as photoprotective agents: A systematic review. J. Med. Plants Res. 2016, 10, 848-864. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kerr, A.; Ferguson, J. Photoallergic contact dermatitis. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2010, 26, 56-65. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Faurschou, A.; Beyer, D.M.; Schmedes, A.; Bogh, M.K.; Philipsen, P.A.; Wulf, H.C. The relation between sunscreen layer thickness and vitamin D production after ultraviolet B exposure: A randomized clinical trial. Brit. J. Dermatol. 2012, 167, 391-395. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gorham, E.D.; Mohr, S.B.; Garland, C.F.; Chaplin, G.; Garland, F.C. Do sunscreens increase risk of melanoma in populations residing at higher latitudes? Annals Epidemiol. 2007, 17, 956-963. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Autier, P. Sunscreen abuse for intentional sun exposure. Brit. J. Dermatol. 2009, 161 (Suppl. 3), 40-45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Pan, Z.; Lee, W.; Slutsky, L.; Clark, R.A.; Permodet, N.; Rafailovich, M.H. Adverse effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts and how to protect cells. Small 2009, 5, 511-520. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Filipe, P.; Silva, J.N.; Silva, R.; Cirne de Castro, J.L.; Marques Gomes, M.; Alves, L.C.; Santus, R.; Pinheiro, T. Stratum corneum is an effective barrier to TiO 2 and ZnO nanoparticle percutaneous absorption. Skin Pharmacol. Phys. 2009, 22, 266-275. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Holick, M.F. Vitamin D: A millenium perspective. J. Cell Biochem. 2003, 88, 296-307. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
- Marks, R.; Foley, P.A.; Jolley, D.; Knight, K.R.; Thompson, S.C. The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population. Arch. Dermatol. 1995, 131, 415-421. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Smaoui, S.; Ben Hlima, H.; Ben Chobba, I.; Kadri, A. Development and stability studies of sunscreen cream formulations containing three photo-protective filters. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S1216-S1222. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Rosenthal, A.; Stoddard, M.; Chipps, L.; Herrmann, J. Skin cancer prevention: A review of current topical options complementary to sunscreens. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019, 33, 1261-1267. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Megna, M.; Lembo, S.; Balato, N.; Monfrecola, G. "Active" photoprotection: Sunscreens with DNA repair enzymes. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017, 152, 302-307.
- Emanuele, E.; Altabas, V.; Altabas, K.; Berardesca, E. Topical application of preparations containing DNA repair enzymes prevents ultraviolet-induced telomere shortening and c-FOS proto-oncogene hyperexpression in human skin: An experimental pilot study. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2013, 12, 1017-1021.
- Carducci, M.; Pavone, P.S.; De, G.M.; Lovati, S.; Altabas, V.; Altabas, K.; Emanuele, E. Comparative effects of sunscreens alone vs sunscreens plus DNA repair enzymes in patients with actinic keratosis: Clinical and molecular findings from a 6-month, randomized, clinical study. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2015, 14, 986-990. [PubMed]
- Kuraoka, I. Diversity of endonuclease V: From DNA repair to RNA editing. Biomolecules 2015, 5, 2194-2206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Stoddard, M.; Herrmann, J.; Moy, L.; Moy, R. Improvement of actinic keratoses using topical DNA repair enzymes: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2017, 16, 1030-1034. [PubMed]
- Liu, Z.; Tan, C.; Guo, X.; Kao, Y.-T.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Sancar, A.; Zhong, D. Dynamics and mechanism of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer repair by DNA photolyase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14831-14836. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Berardesca, E.; Bertona, M.; Altabas, K.; Altabas, V.; Emanuele, E. Reduced ultraviolet-induced DNA damage and apoptosis in human skin with topical application of a photolyase-containing DNA repair enzyme cream: Clues to skin cancer prevention. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012, 5, 570-574.
- Huang, X.X.; Scolyer, R.A.; Abubakar, A.; Halliday, G.M. Human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase-1 is downregulated in human basal cell carcinoma. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012, 106, 127-130. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wulff, B.C.; Schick, J.S.; Thomas-Ahner, J.M.; Kusewitt, D.F.; Yarosh, D.B.; Oberyszyn, T.M. Topical treatment with OGG1 enzyme affects UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008, 84, 317-321. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kuse, Y.; Ogawa, K.; Tsuruma, K.; Shimazawa, M.; Hara, H. Damage of photoreceptor-derived cells in culture induced by light emitting diode-derived blue light. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5223. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mark, J.R.; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt, F.; Trabulsi, E.J.; Gomella, L.G. Blue light cystoscopy for detection and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Can. J. Urol. 2012, 19, 6227-6231.
- Brown, S.B.; Brown, E.A.; Walker, I. The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5, 497-508. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Barolet, D.; Christiaens, F.; Hamblin, M.R. Infrared and skin: Friend or foe. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2016, 155, 78-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Kim, S.J.; Bae, J.; Lee, S.E.; Lee, J.B.; Park, C.H.; Lim, D.H.; Park, M.S. A novel in vivo test method for evaluating the infrared radiation protection provided by sunscreen products. Skin Res. Technol. 2019, 0, 1-6.
- Authors
- Ngoc, L. T. N., Tran, V. V., Moon, J.-Y., Chae, M., Park, D., & Lee, Y.-C.
- Affiliations
- Gachon University (KR)
- Hansung University (KR)
- Biocell Korea Co., Ltd., 1-2F Janghan B/D,54 Bongeunsa-ro 30-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 04631, Korea
- Korea Railroad Research Institute (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Duckshin
- Lee, Young-Chul
- Venue
- Cosmetics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-11-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 64
- ISSN
- 2079-9284 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2987513708
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cosmetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1A09000642)
- R&D program of the Korea Railroad Research Institute, Republic of Korea (.)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Keywords
- sunscreen, ultraviolet radiation, UV filters, organic UV filters, inorganic UV filters, botanical ingredients, skin aging, sunburn, immunosuppression, photoallergic dermatitis, vitamin D deficiency, environmental pollution, sunscreen formulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review