Cited by 24Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesAI in cancer detectionGene expression and cancer classification

An ensembled framework for human breast cancer survivability prediction using deep learning

Open access
Mustafa, Ehzaz, Jadoon, Ehtisham Khan, Khaliq-uz-Zaman, Sardar, Humayun, Mohammad Ali, Maray, Mohammed·2023·Diagnostics

Abstract

Breast cancer is categorized as an aggressive disease, and it is one of the leading causes of death. Accurate survival predictions for both long-term and short-term survivors, when delivered on time, can help physicians make effective treatment decisions for their patients. Therefore, there is a dire need to design an efficient and rapid computational model for breast cancer prognosis. In this study, we propose an ensemble model for breast cancer survivability prediction (EBCSP) that utilizes multi-modal data and stacks the output of multiple neural networks. Specifically, we design a convolutional neural network (CNN) for clinical modalities, a deep neural network (DNN) for copy number variations (CNV), and a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture for gene expression modalities to effectively handle multi-dimensional data. The independent models' results are then used for binary classification (long term > 5 years and short term < 5 years) based on survivability using the random forest method. The EBCSP model's successful application outperforms models that utilize a single data modality for prediction and existing benchmarks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/diagnostics13101688

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mustafa, E., Jadoon, E. K., Khaliq-uz-Zaman, S., Humayun, M. A., & Maray, M.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Department of Computer Science, Comsats University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Islamabad 22060, Pakistan
  • Information Technology University (PK)
  • King Khalid University (SA)
Corresponding author
Mustafa, Ehzaz
Venue
Diagnostics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-05-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
1688
ISSN
2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378515984
Cited by
24
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University (235/1444)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
breast cancer, survival prediction, prognosis, ensemble learning, multimodal fusion, clinical data, copy number variation, gene expression, convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory, random forest, binary classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review