Cited by 88Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

MSRNet: Multiclass Skin Lesion Recognition Using Additional Residual Block Based Fine-Tuned Deep Models Information Fusion and Best Feature Selection

Open access
Bibi, Sobia, Khan, Muhammad Attique, Shah, Jamal Hussain, Damaševičius, Robertas, Alasiry, Areej, Marzougui, Mehrez, Alhaisoni, Majed, Masood, Anum·2023·Diagnostics

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading significant causes of illness and chronic disease worldwide. Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, is becoming a severe health problem due to its rising prevalence. The considerable death rate linked with melanoma requires early detection to receive immediate and successful treatment. Lesion detection and classification are more challenging due to many forms of artifacts such as hairs, noise, and irregularity of lesion shape, color, irrelevant features, and textures. In this work, we proposed a deep-learning architecture for classifying multiclass skin cancer and melanoma detection. The proposed architecture consists of four core steps: image preprocessing, feature extraction and fusion, feature selection, and classification. A novel contrast enhancement technique is proposed based on the image luminance information. After that, two pre-trained deep models, DarkNet-53 and DensNet-201, are modified in terms of a residual block at the end and trained through transfer learning. In the learning process, the Genetic algorithm is applied to select hyperparameters. The resultant features are fused using a two-step approach named serial-harmonic mean. This step increases the accuracy of the correct classification, but some irrelevant information is also observed. Therefore, an algorithm is developed to select the best features called marine predator optimization (MPA) controlled Reyni Entropy. The selected features are finally classified using machine learning classifiers for the final classification. Two datasets, ISIC2018 and ISIC2019, have been selected for the experimental process. On these datasets, the obtained maximum accuracy of 85.4% and 98.80%, respectively. To prove the effectiveness of the proposed methods, a detailed comparison is conducted with several recent techniques and shows the proposed framework outperforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/diagnostics13193063

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fusion image processing techniques can improve the localization and classification of skin lesions by analyzing macro-scale images.

    “Fusion image processing techniques can improve the localization and classification of skin lesions by analyzing macro-scale images [42,43]”

    From Artificial Intelligence in the Histopathological Assessment of Non-Neoplastic Skin Disorders: A Narrative Review with Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Conclusions (section 5; page unavailable) report improved skin-lesion classification using fused features and say the framework can aid lesion localization with GradCAM. The paper describes dermoscopic images, not macro-scale images, and does not show that fusion itself improves localization. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [36]Pacheco A.G. Ali A.-R. Trappenberg T. Skin cancer detection based on deep learning and entropy to detect outlier samples arXiv 2019 1909.04525
  2. [37]Farooq M.A. Khatoon A. Varkarakis V. Corcoran P. Advanced deep learning methodologies for skin cancer classification in prodromal stages arXiv 2020 2003.06356
  3. [40]Milton M.A.A. Automated skin lesion classification using ensemble of deep neural networks in isic 2018: Skin lesion analysis towards melanoma detection challenge arXiv 2019 1901.10802
  4. [46]Redmon J. Farhadi A. Yolov3: An incremental improvement arXiv 2018 1804.02767
  5. [51]Elansary I. Ismail A. Awad W. Efficient classification model for melanoma based on convolutional neural networks Medical Informatics and Bioimaging Using Artificial Intelligence Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2022 15 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bibi, S., Khan, M. A., Shah, J. H., Damaševičius, R., Alasiry, A., Marzougui, M., Alhaisoni, M., & Masood, A.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • HITEC University (PK)
  • Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
  • King Khalid University (SA)
  • Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Masood, Anum
Venue
Diagnostics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
13
Issue
19
Pages
3063
ISSN
2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387100990
Cited by
88
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 2
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTUePubl (Repository of Kaunas University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University (RGP2/249/44)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
skin lesion classification, melanoma detection, skin cancer, multi-class classification, transfer learning, Darknet-53, DenseNet201, feature fusion, feature selection, Rényi entropy, genetic algorithm hyperparameter optimization, contrast enhancement, ISIC 2018, ISIC 2019

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review