Cited by 584Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Seven-point checklist and skin lesion classification using multitask multimodal neural nets

Kawahara, Jeremy, Daneshvar, Sara, Argenziano, Giuseppe, Hamarneh, Ghassan·2019·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

We propose a multi-task deep convolutional neural network, trained on multi-modal data (clinical and dermoscopic images, and patient meta-data), to classify the 7-point melanoma checklist criteria and perform skin lesion diagnosis. Our neural network is trained using several multi-task loss functions, where each loss considers different combinations of the input modalities, which allows our model to be robust to missing data at inference time. Our final model classifies the 7-point checklist and skin condition diagnosis, produces multi-modal feature vectors suitable for image retrieval, and localizes clinically discriminant regions. We benchmark our approach using 1011 lesion cases, and report comprehensive results over all 7-point criteria and diagnosis. We also make our dataset (images and metadata) publicly available online at http://derm.cs.sfu.ca.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2824327

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kawahara et al. used CNNs as feature extractors for imaging modalities but experimented with a unique multimodal multi-task loss function that considers multiple combinations of the input modalities.

    “Kawahara et al.39 also used CNNs as feature extractors for imaging modalities but experimented with a unique multimodal multi-task loss function that considers multiple combinations of the input modalities.”
  • Kawahara et al., Yala et al., and Yoo et al. reported an improvement in performance using fusion compared to image-only models.

    “Kawahara et al., Yala et al. and Yoo et al. reported an improvement in performance using fusion compared to image-only models (Table 1).”
  • The complexity of the non-imaging data used in multimodal fusion studies was limited, with most studies using basic demographic information (age, gender), a limited range of categorical clinical history (e.g., hypertension, smoking status), or disease-specific features strongly associated with the disease of interest (e.g., APOE4 for Alzheimer's, PSA for prostate cancer).

    “The complexity of the non-imaging data in multimodal fusion work was limited, particularly in the context of available feature-rich and time-series data in the EHR. Instead, most studies focused primarily on basic demographic information such as age and gender25,27,39, a limited range of categorical clinical history such as hypertension or smoking status32,34 or disease-specific clinical features”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawahara, J., Daneshvar, S., Argenziano, G., & Hamarneh, G.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2019-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
538-546
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2797527544
Cited by
584
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
melanoma, skin lesion classification, dermoscopic images, multi-task learning, multimodal neural networks, missing data robustness, image retrieval, lesion localization, clinical metadata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review