Cited by 57Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

A review of the practical applications of pedagogic conversational agents to be used in school and university classrooms

Open access
Pérez-Marín, Diana·2021·Digital

Abstract

Pedagogic Conversational Agents (PCAs) can be defined as autonomous characters that cohabit learning environments with students to create rich learning interactions. Currently, there are many agents reported in the literature of this fast-evolving field. In this paper, several designs of PCAs used as instructors, students, or companions are reviewed using a taxonomy to analyze the possibilities that PCAs can bring into the classrooms. Finally, a discussion as to whether this technology could become the future of education depending on the design trends identified is open for any educational technology practitioner, researcher, teacher, or manager involved in 21st century education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/digital1010002

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Rickel, J.; Johnson, W. Virtual humans for team training in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, France, 19-23 July 1999; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 578-585.
  2. Hays, M.; Lane, C.; Auerbach, D.; Core, M.; Gomboc, D.; Rosenberg, M. Feedback Specificity and the Learnig of Intercultural Communication Skills. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, UK, 6-10 July 2009; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.
  3. Rogers, Y.; Preece, J.; Sharp, H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.
  4. Tamayo, S.; Pérez-Marín, D. An Agent Proposal for Reading Understanding Applied to the Resolution of Maths problems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computers in Education, IEEE, Andorra la Vella, Andorra, 29-31 October 2012; pp. 1-4.
  5. Slater, D. Interactive Animated Pedagogical Agents. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pérez-Marín, D.
Affiliations
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Corresponding author
Pérez-Marín, Diana
Venue
Digital
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-01-29
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
18-33
ISSN
2673-6470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121932387
Cited by
57
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Digital (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (TIN 2015-66731-C2-1-R)
  • Comunidad de Madrid (P2018/TCS-4307)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
agent-based learning, educational technology, future of education, virtual instructor, online students, virtual companions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review