Usability Testing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interface design for the initial stages of learning is strongly promoted in most usability guidelines.
“Interface design for the initial stages of learning is strongly promoted in most usability guidelines [Norman 1983a[Norman , 1983b;;Shneiderman 1992;Dix et al. 1993;Nielsen 1993].”
From Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces (2015) · cites this paper as Nielsen 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator
Gidney, C. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-07-06-497 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities
Karsh, B.-T., Weinger, M. B., Abbott, P. A., & Wears, R. L. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.005637 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines
Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., & Attar, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518803 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability
Zhang, J., & Walji, M. F. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.005 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Digital transformation of mental health services
Bond, R. R., Mulvenna, M. D., Potts, C., O’Neill, S., Ennis, E., & Torous, J. (2023) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-023-00033-y · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces
Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Scarr, J., & Malacria, S. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2659796 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferences
Shankar, S., Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Hartmann, B., Parameswaran, A., & Arawjo, I. (2024) · Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676450 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Pérez-Marín, D. (2021) · Digital · doi:10.3390/digital1010002 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Testing the robustness and performance of spatially consistent interfaces
Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., & Malacria, S. (2013) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466430 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Caulfield, B., Reginatto, B., & Slevin, P. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0082-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Contrasting usability evaluation methods with blind users
Miao, M., Pham, H. A., Friebe, J., & Weber, G. (2016) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0378-8 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Jensen, K. L., & Larsen, L. B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile technology, applications, and systems and the 1st international symposium on Computer human interaction in mobile technology · doi:10.1145/1378063.1378177 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Systematic Analysis of Mobile Diabetes Management Applications on Different Platforms
Garcia, E., Martin, C., Garcia, A., Harrison, R., & Flood, D. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_27 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Ingeman, K., Frostholm, L., Wellnitz, K. B., Wright, K., Frydendal, D. H., Onghena, P., & Rask, C. U. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/46927 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The method involved participants verbalizing their thoughts while using the web-based program [18,19].”
- Authors
- NIELSEN, J.
- Corresponding author
- NIELSEN, JAKOB
- ORCID
- NIELSEN, JAKOB
- Venue
- Usability Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 165-206
- OpenAlex
- W3021091026
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 120 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- usability testing, user interface evaluation, human-computer interaction, user experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
