The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ECG Classification Using Wavelet Packet Entropy and Random Forests
Open accessAbstract
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most important techniques for heart disease diagnosis. Many traditional methodologies of feature extraction and classification have been widely applied to ECG analysis. However, the effectiveness and efficiency of such methodologies remain to be improved, and much existing research did not consider the separation of training and testing samples from the same set of patients (so called inter-patient scheme). To cope with these issues, in this paper, we propose a method to classify ECG signals using wavelet packet entropy (WPE) and random forests (RF) following the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) recommendations and the inter-patient scheme. Specifically, we firstly decompose the ECG signals by wavelet packet decomposition (WPD), and then calculate entropy from the decomposed coefficients as representative features, and finally use RF to build an ECG classification model. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that WPE and RF are used to classify ECG following the AAMI recommendations and the inter-patient scheme. Extensive experiments are conducted on the publicly available MIT–BIH Arrhythmia database and influence of mother wavelets and level of decomposition for WPD, type of entropy and the number of base learners in RF on the performance are also discussed. The experimental results are superior to those by several state-of-the-art competing methods, showing that WPE and RF is promising for ECG classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database
Moody, G. B., & Mark, R. G. (2001) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/51.932724 · Cited by 4,812
On Measures of Entropy and Information
Rényi, A. (1961) · Project Euclid (Cornell University) · Cited by 4,031
Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification
Pal, M. (2005) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160412331269698 · Cited by 3,283
Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest
Díaz-Uriarte, R., & Alvarez de Andrés, S. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-3 · Cited by 2,929
Automatic Classification of Heartbeats Using ECG Morphology and Heartbeat Interval Features
deChazal, P., O'Dwyer, M., & Reilly, R. B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2004.827359 · Cited by 1,671
Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications
(2006) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8 · Cited by 981
ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection: A survey
Luz, E. J. D. S., Schwartz, W. R., Cámara-Chávez, G., & Menotti, D. (2016) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.008 · Cited by 878
Cited by
Nweke, H. F., Teh, Y. W., Mujtaba, G., & Al-garadi, M. A. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.06.002 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., & Zhou, M.
- Venue
- Entropy
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-08-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 285
- ISSN
- 1099-4300 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2482102801
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ECG Classification Using Wavelet Packet Entropy and Random Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/e18080285
- The paper
- Li, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). ECG Classification Using Wavelet Packet Entropy and Random Forests. Entropy. https://doi.org/10.3390/e18080285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.