Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,929

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest

Open access
Díaz-Uriarte, Ramón, Alvarez de Andrés, Sara·2006·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background: Selection of relevant genes for sample classification is a common task in most gene expression studies, where researchers try to identify the smallest possible set of genes that can still achieve good predictive performance (for instance, for future use with diagnostic purposes in clinical practice). Many gene selection approaches use univariate (gene-by-gene) rankings of gene relevance and arbitrary thresholds to select the number of genes, can only be applied to two-class problems, and use gene selection ranking criteria unrelated to the classification algorithm. In contrast, random forest is a classification algorithm well suited for microarray data: it shows excellent performance even when most predictive variables are noise, can be used when the number of variables is much larger than the number of observations and in problems involving more than two classes, and returns measures of variable importance. Thus, it is important to understand the performance of random forest with microarray data and its possible use for gene selection. Results: We investigate the use of random forest for classification of microarray data (including multi-class problems) and propose a new method of gene selection in classification problems based on random forest. Using simulated and nine microarray data sets we show that random forest has comparable performance to other classification methods, including DLDA, KNN, and SVM, and that the new gene selection procedure yields very small sets of genes (often smaller than alternative methods) while preserving predictive accuracy. Conclusion: Because of its performance and features, random forest and gene selection using random forest should probably become part of the "standard tool-box" of methods for class prediction and gene selection with microarray data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2105-7-3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Lee JW, Lee JB, Park M, Song SH: An extensive evaluation of recent classification tools applied to microarray data. Computation Statistics and Data Analysis 2005, 48: 869–885. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Yeung KY, Bumgarner RE, Raftery AE: Bayesian model averaging: development of an improved multi-class, gene selection and classification tool for microarray data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 2394–2402. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Jirapech-Umpai T, Aitken S: Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: Evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6: 148. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hua J, Xiong Z, Lowey J, Suh E, Dougherty ER: Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules. Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 1509–1515. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Li Y, Campbell C, Tipping M: Bayesian automatic relevance determination algorithms for classifying gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2002, 18: 1332–1339. · DOI
  6. Díaz-Uriarte R: Supervised methods with genomic data: a review and cautionary view. In Data analysis and visualization in genomics and proteomics. Edited by: Azuaje F, Dopazo J. New York: Wiley; 2005:193–214. · DOI
  7. Dudoit S, Fridlyand J, Speed TP: Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors suing gene expression data. J Am Stat Assoc 2002, 97(457):77–87. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Li T, Zhang C, Ogihara M: A comparative study of feature selection and multiclass classification methods for tissue classification based on gene expression. Bioinformatics 2004, 20: 2429–2437. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Roepman P, Wessels LF, Kettelarij N, Kemmeren P, Miles AJ, Lijnzaad P, Tilanus MG, Koole R, Hordijk GJ, van der Vliet PC, Reinders MJ, Slootweg PJ, Holstege FC: An expression profile for diagnosis of lymph node metastases from primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nat Genet 2005, 37: 182–186. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Furlanello C, Serafini M, Merler S, Jurman G: An accelerated procedure for recursive feature ranking on microarray data. Neural Netw 2003, 16: 641–648. · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(03)00103-5
  11. Bø TH, Jonassen I: New feature subset selection procedures for classification of expression profiles. Genome Biology 2002, 3(4):0017.1–0017.11. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C: Classification and regression trees. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1984.
  13. Ripley BD: Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Alvarez S, Diaz-Uriarte R, Osorio A, Barroso A, Melchor L, Paz MF, Honrado E, Rodriguez R, Urioste M, Valle L, Diez O, Cigudosa JC, Dopazo J, Esteller M, Benitez J: A Predictor Based on the Somatic Genomic Changes of the BRCA1/BRCA2 Breast Cancer Tumors Identifies the Non-BRCAl/BRCA2 Tumors with BRCA1 Promoter Hypermethylation. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11: 1146–1153. · DOI
  15. Izmirlian G: Application of the random forest classification algorithm to a SELDI-TOF proteomics study in the setting of a cancer prevention trial. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004, 1020: 154–174. · DOI
  16. Wu B, Abbott T, Fishman D, McMurray W, Mor G, Stone K, Ward D, Williams K, Zhao H: Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19: 1636–1643. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gunther EC, Stone DJ, Gerwien RW, Bento P, Heyes MP: Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100: 9608–9613. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Man MZ, Dyson G, Johnson K, Liao B: Evaluating methods for classifying expression data. J Biopharm Statist 2004, 14: 1065–1084. · DOI
  19. Schwender H, Zucknick M, Ickstadt K, Bolt HM: A pilot study on the application of statistical classification procedures to molecular epidemiological data. Toxicol Lett 2004, 151: 291–299. · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.02.021
  20. Liaw A, Wiener M: Classification and regression by randomForest. Rnews 2002, 2: 18–22.
  21. Dudoit S, Fridlyand J: Classification in microarray experiments. In Statistical analysis of gene expression microarray data. Edited by: Speed T. New York: Chapman & Hall; 2003:93–158.
  22. Svetnik V, Liaw A, Tong C, Wang T: Application of Breiman's random forest to modeling structure-activity relationships of pharmaceutical molecules. Multiple Classier Systems, Fifth International Workshop, MCS 2004, Proceedings, 9–11 June 2004, Cagliari, Italy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer 2004, 3077: 334–343.
  23. Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, Baumgartner R: Class prediction and discovery using gene microarray and proteomics mass spectroscopy data: curses, caveats, cautions. Bioinformatics 2003, 19: 1484–1491. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pan KH, Lih CJ, Cohen SN: Effects of threshold choice on biological conclusions reached during analysis of gene expression by DNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 8961–8965. · DOI
  25. Ein-Dor L, Kela I, Getz G, Givol D, Domany E: Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 171–178. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C: Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 2005, 365: 488–492. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Romualdi C, Campanaro S, Campagna D, Celegato B, Cannata N, Toppo S, Valle G, Lanfranchi G: Pattern recognition in gene expression profiling using DNA array: a comparative study of different statistical methods applied to cancer classification. Hum Mol Genet 2003, 12(8):823–836. · DOI
  28. Dettling M: BagBoosting for tumor classification with gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2004, 20: 3583–593. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G: Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99(10):6567–6572. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ambroise C, McLachlan GJ: Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99(10):6562–6566. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ: Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J American Statistical Association 1997, 92: 548–560.
  32. Bureau A, Dupuis J, Hayward B, Falls K, Van Eerdewegh P: Mapping complex traits using Random Forests. BMC Genet 2003, 4(Suppl 1):S64. · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-4-s1-s64
  33. Simon R, Radmacher MD, Dobbin K, McShane LM: Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003, 95: 14–18. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Braga-Neto U, Hashimoto R, Dougherty ER, Nguyen DV, Carroll RJ: Is cross-validation better than resubstitution for ranking genes? Bioinformatics 2004, 20: 253–258. · DOI
  35. Faraway J: On the cost of data analysis. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1992, 1: 251–231. · DOI
  36. Harrell JFE: Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer; 2001. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Deutsch JM: Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray prediction. Bioinformatics 2003, 19: 45–52. · DOI
  38. Zhou X, Mao KZ: LS Bound based gene selection for DNA microarray data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 1559–1564. · DOI
  39. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, Coller H, Loh ML, Downing JR, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, Lander ES: Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999, 286: 531–537. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Jiang H, Deng Y, Chen H, Tao L, Sha Q, Chen J, Tsai C, Zhang S: Joint analysis of two microarray gene-expression data sets to select lung adenocarcinoma marker genes. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5: 81. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Yeung KY, Bumgarner RE: Multiclass classification of microarray data with repeated measurements: application to cancer. Genome Biol 2003, 4: R83. · DOI
  42. Breiman L: Statistical modeling: the two cultures (with discussion). Statistical Science 2001, 16: 199–231. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Dettling M, Bühlmann P: Finding predictive gene groups from microarray data. J Multivariate Anal 2004, 90: 106–131. · DOI
  44. Simon RM, Korn EL, McShane LM, Radmacher MD, Wright GW, Zhao Y: Design and analysis of DNA microarray investigations. New York: Springer; 2003.
  45. Yu H: Rmpi: Interface (Wrapper) to MPI (Message-Passing Interface).Tech. rep., Department of Statistics, University of Western Ontario; 2004. [http://www.stats.uwo.ca/faculty/yu/Rmpi]
  46. McLachlan GJ: Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. New York: Wiley; 1992. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Furey TS, Cristianini N, Duffy N, Bednarski DW, Schummer M, Haussler D: Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 2000, 16(10):906–914. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lee Y, Lee CK: Classification of multiple cancer types by multicategory support vector machines using gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(9):1132–1139. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Ramaswamy S, Tamayo P, Rifkin R, Mukherjee S, Yeang C, Angelo M, Ladd C, Reich M, Latulippe E, Mesirov J, Poggio T, Gerald W, Loda M, Lander E, Golub T: Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98(26):15149–15154. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Burgues CJC: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1998, 2: 121–167. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Vaquerizas JM, Conde L, Yankilevich P, Cabezon A, Minguez P, Diaz-Uriarte R, Al-Shahrour F, Herrero J, Dopazo J: GEPAS, an experiment-oriented pipeline for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: W616–20. · DOI
  52. Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, Perou CM, Rees C, Spellman P, Iyer V, Jeffrey SS, de Rijn MV, Waltham M, Pergamenschikov A, Lee JC, Lashkari D, Shalon D, Myers TG, Weinstein JN, Botstein D, Brown PO: Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nature Genetics 2000, 24(3):227–235. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Ramaswamy S, Ross KN, Lander ES, Golub TR: A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nature Genetics 2003, 33: 49–54. · DOI · Paper page
  54. Pomeroy SL, Tamayo P, Gaasenbeek M, Sturla LM, Angelo M, McLaughlin ME, Kim JY, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Lau C, Allen JC, Zagzag D, Olson JM, Curran T, Wetmore C, Biegel JA, Poggio T, Mukherjee S, Rifkin R, Califano A, Stolovitzky G, Louis DN, Mesirov JP, Lander ES, Golub TR: Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 2002, 415: 436–442. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Alon U, Barkai N, Notterman DA, Gish K, Ybarra S, Mack D, Levine AJ: Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96: 6745–6750. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Losses IS, Rosenwald A, Boldrick JC, Sabet H, Tran T, Yu X, Powell JI, Yang L, Marti GE, Moore T, Hudson J Jr, Lu L, Lewis DB, Tibshirani R, Sherlock G, Chan WC, Greiner TC, Weisenburger DD, Armitage JO, Warnke R, Levy R, Wilson W, Grever MR, Byrd JC, Botstein D, Brown PO, Staudt LM: Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000, 403: 503–511. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Singh D, Febbo PG, Ross K, Jackson DG, Manola J, Ladd C, Tamayo P, Renshaw AA, D'Amico AV, Richie JP, Lander ES, Loda M, Kantoff PW, Golub TR, Sellers WR: Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer Cell 2002, 1: 203–209. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,929

Metadata

Authors
Díaz-Uriarte, R., & Alvarez de Andrés, S.
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2006-01-06
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1520812622
Cited by
2,929
References
7
FWCI
26.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-3
The paper
Díaz-Uriarte, R., & Alvarez de Andrés, S. (2006). Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.