Cited by 13Polymer crystallization and propertiesCrystallization and Solubility Studiesnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

Estimating the Nucleation Ability of Various Surfaces Towards Isotactic Polypropylene via Light Intensity Induction Time Measurements

Open access
Carmeli, Enrico, Wang, Bao, Moretti, Paolo, Tranchida, Davide, Cavallo, Dario·2019·Entropy

Abstract

Crystallization of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) at the interface with crystalline films of two commercially employed nucleating agents (sodium benzoate (NaBz) and sodium 2,2’-methylene bis-(4,6-di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphate (NA-11)) and with a glass fiber (GF) was investigated using a polarized optical microscope. The analysis of the light intensity evolution during the crystallization process enabled the successful estimation of the time at which the crystal growth began, i.e., the induction time (ti), at various crystallization temperatures. Meaningful differences in the ti values were observed between the investigated systems. Moreover, the ti data have been analyzed according to different nucleation models proposed in the literature, which consider either the time to form the first crystalline layer in contact with the substrate or the time required to grow a cluster of critical size. It has been found that the two models are applicable in different temperature ranges depending on the efficiency of the given substrate. Therefore, in order to obtain the value of the surface free energy difference function, Δσ, which is directly related to the nucleation energy barrier and useful for the definition of a universal nucleating efficiency scale, a model that considers both the above-mentioned times was fitted to the overall data. The values of Δσ for the nucleation of iPP on the surface of the different substrates are thus obtained and discussed in the framework of the literature results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/e21111068

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Q1, light intensity measurements show a first slight intensity increase corresponding to PLLA crystallization, followed by a sharper increase due to PE crystallization, then PCL crystallization increases intensity, and finally the sharpest increase is due to PEO crystallization.

    “Starting from the molten state (a), the first slight intensity increase corresponds to the crystallization of the PLLA block (b), followed by a sharper increase due to the PE block crystallization (c). Then, the crystallization of the PCL block increases the intensity value (d), and finally, the sharpest increase in intensity is due to the crystallization of the PEO block (e).”

    From Sequential Crystallization and Multicrystalline Morphology in PE- <i>b</i> -PEO- <i>b</i> -PCL- <i>b</i> -PLLA Tetrablock Quarterpolymers (2021) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results, under “Light Intensity Method” (page unavailable), describe increasing light intensity during isothermal crystallization of isotactic polypropylene. Our copy does not address Q1 or the claimed PLLA → PE → PCL → PEO crystallization sequence; searches for those block names and sequential crystallization found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carmeli, E., Wang, B., Moretti, P., Tranchida, D., & Cavallo, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Genoa (IT)
  • Borealis (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
Cavallo, Dario
Venue
Entropy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-10-31
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1068
ISSN
1099-4300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982672240
Cited by
13
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entropy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
isotactic polypropylene, nucleation, crystallization, induction period, light intensity measurement, nucleating agents, sodium benzoate, glass fiber, nucleation barrier, nucleation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review