Cited by 8Educational Technology and E-LearningOnline and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Impact of E-Learning Orientation, Moodle Usage, and Learning Planning on Learning Outcomes in On-Demand Lectures

Open access
Aida, Saori·2023·Education Sciences

Abstract

The growing prominence of e-learning in education has led to the need for a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing learning outcomes. This study aims to investigate the combined effects of e-learning orientation, Moodle usage, and learning planning on learning outcomes in the context of on-demand lectures. A sample of participants from the Department of Information Science and Engineering in the Faculty of Engineering completed questionnaires related to e-learning orientation, while Moodle usage data and learning planning information were collected. Correlation, principal component, cluster, and multiple regression analysis were conducted to examine the relationships between variables and their impact on learning outcomes. The results suggest that e-learning orientation did not exert a significant influence on learning outcomes. However, Moodle usage and learning planning emerged as crucial factors. Increased engagement with Moodle, as indicated by higher clicks and utilization of its learning functionalities, was associated with improved learning outcomes. Additionally, effective learning planning, characterized by adherence to schedules and timely submissions, positively influenced learning outcomes. The results emphasize the importance of considering multiple factors, not just a single factor, for successful online learning. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing learning outcomes in on-demand lectures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/educsci13101005

Cites

32 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Sugiura, M.; Kogo, C. Effectiveness of the Training Which is Combined e-Learning and Realistic Simulation toward Sudden Changes of Patients. Res. Rep. JSET Conf. 2013, 13, 81-88.
  2. Watanabe, F.; Kogo, C. Causal Relationship among Questionnaire Variables Investigating Learners' e-Learning Orientation in Massive Online Courses. Jpn. J. Educ. Technol. 2017, 41, 77-87. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Zimmerman, B.J.; Schunk, D.H. (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 1-12.
  4. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 13-39.
  5. Aida, S. Data Science Technology, 3rd ed.; Gakujutsu Tosho Shuppan-Sha Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 2023; pp. 1-209.
  6. Jonassen, D.H.; Land, S.M. (Eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aida, S.
Affiliations
Yamaguchi University (JP)
Corresponding author
Aida, Saori
Venue
Education Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-10-03
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
1005
ISSN
2227-7102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387342771
Cited by
8
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Education Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
learning planning, learning outcomes, on-demand lectures, online learning, student engagement, engineering students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review