The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews the research trends that link the advanced technical aspects of recommendation systems that are used in various service areas and the business aspects of these services. First, for a reliable analysis of recommendation models for recommendation systems, data mining technology, and related research by application service, more than 135 top-ranking articles and top-tier conferences published in Google Scholar between 2010 and 2021 were collected and reviewed. Based on this, studies on recommendation system models and the technology used in recommendation systems were systematized, and research trends by year were analyzed. In addition, the application service fields where recommendation systems were used were classified, and research on the recommendation system model and recommendation technique used in each field was analyzed. Furthermore, vast amounts of application service-related data used by recommendation systems were collected from 2010 to 2021 without taking the journal ranking into consideration and reviewed along with various recommendation system studies, as well as applied service field industry data. As a result of this study, it was found that the flow and quantitative growth of various detailed studies of recommendation systems interact with the business growth of the actual applied service field. While providing a comprehensive summary of recommendation systems, this study provides insight to many researchers interested in recommendation systems through the analysis of its various technologies and trends in the service field to which recommendation systems are applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
WITHDRAWN: Big data analytic of contexts and cascading tourism for smart city
Balasaraswathi, M., Srinivasan, K., Udayakumar, L., Sivasakthiselvan, S., & Sumithra, M. G. (2020) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.132 · Cited by 30
RetractedThe Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 · Cited by 12,187
Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems
Koren, Y., Bell, R., & Volinsky, C. (2009) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2009.263 · Cited by 11,673
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Neural Collaborative Filtering
He, X., Liao, L., Zhang, H., Nie, L., Hu, X., & Chua, T.-S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052569 · Cited by 6,652
Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2003.1167344 · Cited by 5,403
GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '94 · doi:10.1145/192844.192905 · Cited by 5,058
Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry
Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M., & Terry, D. (1992) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/138859.138867 · Cited by 4,066
Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments
Burke, R. (2002) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1021240730564 · Cited by 3,871
Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model
Koren, Y. (2008) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1401890.1401944 · Cited by 3,852
Cited by
Agentic AI: Autonomous intelligence for complex goals–a comprehensive survey
Acharya, D. B., Kuppan, K., & Divya, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3532853 · Cited by 717
LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendation
Wei, W., Ren, X., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Su, L., Cheng, S., Wang, J., Yin, D., & Huang, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3616855.3635853 · Cited by 268
Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
Huang, X., Lian, J., Lei, Y., Yao, J., Lian, D., & Xie, X. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3731446 · Cited by 89
Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
Huang, X., Lian, J., Lei, Y., Yao, J., Lian, D., & Xie, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.16505 · Cited by 89
Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory
He, Z., Lin, W., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Jones, M. W., Aitchison, L., Xu, X., Liu, M., Kristensson, P. O., & Shen, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00489 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A.
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141
- ISSN
- 2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205390421
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 135.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
