Cited by 33Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesWeb Application Security VulnerabilitiesInformation and Cyber Security

Holding on to Compliance While Adopting DevSecOps: An SLR

Open access
Ramaj, Xhesika, Sánchez-Gordón, Mary, Gkioulos, Vasileios, Chockalingam, Sabarathinam, Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo·2022·Electronics

Abstract

The software industry has witnessed a growing interest in DevSecOps due to the premises of integrating security in the software development lifecycle. However, security compliance cannot be disregarded, given the importance of adherence to regulations, laws, industry standards, and frameworks. This study aims to provide an overview of compliance aspects in the context of DevSecOps and explore how compliance is ensured. Furthermore, this study reveals the trends of compliance according to the extant literature and identifies potential directions for further research in this context. Therefore, we carried out a systematic literature review on the integration of compliance aspects in DevSecOps, which rigorously followed the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham and Charters. We found 934 articles related to the topic by searching five bibliographic databases (163) and Google Scholar (771). Through a rigorous selection process, we selected 15 papers as primary studies. Then, we identified the compliance aspects of DevSecOps and grouped them into three main categories: compliance initiation, compliance management, and compliance technicalities. We observed a low number of studies; therefore, we encourage further efforts into the exploration of compliance aspects, their automated integration, and the development of metrics to evaluate such a process in the context of DevSecOps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics11223707

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compliance automation is recognised as underexplored in both research and industry practice.

    “Compliance and risk management appear as additional focal points, with compliance automation recognised as underexplored in both research and industry practice [25].”

    From Evolution of DevSecOps and Its Influence on Application Security: A Systematic Literature Review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion and Future Work section (page unavailable) reports a low number of studies on integrating compliance into DevSecOps, supporting the research-gap portion of the claim. It also notes challenges automating compliance validation, but does not establish that compliance automation is underexplored across industry practice. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ramaj et al. [25] and Rajapakse et al. [28] document the technical, cultural, and compliance-related barriers organisations face when adopting DevSecOps.

    “Ramaj et al. [25] and Rajapakse et al. [28] document the technical, cultural, and compliance-related barriers organisations face when adopting DevSecOps, while other works provide prescriptive strategies for change management and migration.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Zeeshan, A.A., Ed.; Apress: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 265-278. ISBN 978-1-4842-5850-7.
  2. Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering 2007. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara-Kitchenham/publication/302924724_Guidelines_for_performing_Sys tematic_Literature_Reviews_in_Software_Engineering/links/61712932766c4a211c03a6f7/Guidelines-for-performing-System atic-Literature-Reviews-in-Software-Engineering.pdf (accessed on 22 February 2022).
  3. Chatterjee, R., Ed.; Apress: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 65-104. ISBN 978-1-4842-6434-8.
  4. Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 10027, pp. 590-597. ISBN 978-3-319-49093-9.
  5. Rahman, A.A.U.; Williams, L. Software Security in DevOps: Synthesizing Practitioners' Perceptions and Practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery (CSED), Austin, TX, USA, 14-15 May 2016; pp. 70-76.
  6. Singh, P.K., Noor, A., Kolekar, M.H., Tanwar, S., Bhatnagar, R.K., Khanna, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 211-221.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramaj, X., Sánchez-Gordón, M., Gkioulos, V., Chockalingam, S., & Colomo-Palacios, R.
Affiliations
  • Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO)
  • Department of Computer Science and Communication, Faculty of Computer Sciences, Engineering and Economics, Østfold University College, 1757 Halden, Norway
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Institute for Energy Technology (NO)
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-12
Volume
11
Issue
22
Pages
3707
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309035093
Cited by
33
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Research Council of Norway (RCN) (#309911)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
DevSecOps, security compliance, software development lifecycle, compliance management, security automation, compliance metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review