Cited by 36Online Learning and AnalyticsArtificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Personalized Feedback in Massive Open Online Courses: Harnessing the Power of LangChain and OpenAI API

Open access
Morales-Chan, Miguel, Amado-Salvatierra, Hector R., Medina, José Amelio, Barchino, Roberto, Hernández-Rizzardini, Rocael, Teixeira, António Moreira·2024·Electronics

Abstract

Studies show that feedback greatly improves student learning outcomes, but achieving this level of personalization at scale is a complex task, especially in the diverse and open environment of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This research provides a novel method for using cutting-edge artificial intelligence technology to enhance the feedback mechanism in MOOCs. The main goal of this research is to leverage AI’s capabilities to automate and refine the MOOC feedback process, with special emphasis on courses that allow students to learn at their own pace. The combination of LangChain—a cutting-edge framework specifically designed for applications that use language models—with the OpenAI API forms the basis of this work. This integration creates dynamic, scalable, and intelligent environments that can provide students with individualized, insightful feedback. A well-organized assessment rubric directs the feedback system, ensuring that the responses are both tailored to each learner’s unique path and aligned with academic standards and objectives. This initiative uses Generative AI to enhance MOOCs, making them more engaging, responsive, and successful for a diverse, international student body. Beyond mere automation, this technology has the potential to transform fundamentally how learning is supported in digital environments and how feedback is delivered. The initial results demonstrate increased learner satisfaction and progress, thereby validating the effectiveness of personalized feedback powered by AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics13101960

Cites

23 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As of July 2026, ChatGPT Images 2.0 has no documented alt-text or accessibility feature.

    “Product announcement emphasizes text-rendering accu- racy, speed, and multilingual support; no documented alt-text or accessibility feature.”

    From A Protocol for Evaluating the Accessibility of AI-Generated Educational Materials: Prompt Configuration, WCAG-Derived Criteria, and Content Overload (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction (p. 1) mentions DALL·E image creation, while the Discussion (p. 9) concerns ChatGPT feedback in MOOCs. Searches for ChatGPT Images 2.0, alt-text, accessibility, and the stated product-announcement features found no passage addressing whether that product had a documented accessibility feature as of July 2026. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Devlin, J.; Chang, M.W.; Lee, K.; Toutanova, K. Bert: Pre -training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv 2018 . https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805. · arXiv
  2. [27]27. Lin, J.; Thomas, D.R.; Han, F.; Gupta, S.; Tan, W.; Nguyen, N.D.; Koedinger, K.R. Using large language models to provide explanatory feedback to human tutors. arXiv 2023 , arXiv:2306.15498. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales-Chan, M., Amado-Salvatierra, H. R., Medina, J. A., Barchino, R., Hernández-Rizzardini, R., & Teixeira, A. M.
Affiliations
  • GES Department, Universidad Galileo, Guatemala City 01010, Guatemala
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Galileo University (GT)
  • Department of Education and Distance Learning, Universidade Aberta de Portugal, 1250-100 Lisboa, Portugal
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-05-16
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
1960
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396952293
Cited by
35
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • e_Buah (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
personalized feedback, massive open online courses, automated feedback, LangChain, OpenAI API, generative AI, assessment rubrics, self-paced learning, student satisfaction, artificial intelligence in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review