The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review of CO2 Capture Technologies and Prospects for Clean Power Generation
Open accessAbstract
With rapid growth in global demand for energy, the emission of CO2 is increasing due to the use of fossil fuels in power plants. Effective strategies are required to decrease the industrial emissions to meet the climate change target set at 21st Conference of the Parties (COP 21). Carbon capture and storage have been recognized as the most useful methods to reduce the CO2 emissions while using fossil fuels in power generation. This work reviews different methods and updates of the current technologies to capture and separate CO2 generated in a thermal power plant. Carbon capture is classified in two broad categories depending on the requirement of separation of CO2 from the gases. The novel methods of oxy combustion and chemical looping combustion carbon capture have been compared with the traditional post combustion and precombustion carbon capture methods. The current state of technology and limitation of each of the processes including commonly used separation techniques for CO2 from the gas mixture are discussed in this review. Further research and investigations are suggested based on the technological maturity, economic viability, and lack of proper knowledge of the combustion system for further improvement of the capture system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the present time, and similarly to the case of natural gas processing, the most mature CO2 removal technique for postcombustion streams is chemical absorption with aqueous amines.5,527−529”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [528]
In the citing paper
“Apart from the already mature aqueous amine absorption technology for CCS, promising technologies for CCS from postcombustion streams include chemical looping, adsorption, and membrane processes, but these need to be improved in order to allow for wider deployment of CCS processes.472,527,528,542”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [528]
Citations
Cites
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18307 · Cited by 3,637
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies
Adánez, J., Abad, A., Garcı́a-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., & de Diego, L. F. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001 · Cited by 2,236
Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review
Yang, H., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Gupta, R. P., Slimane, R. B., Bland, A. E., & Wright, I. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(08)60002-9 · Cited by 2,088
A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption
Yu, C.-H., Huang, C.-H., & Tan, C.-S. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132 · Cited by 1,730
Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes
Merkel, T. C., Lin, H., Wei, X., & Baker, R. W. (2009) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041 · Cited by 1,696
Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2015) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001 · Cited by 1,571
Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation
Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F. (2005) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,542
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Langlois, 2016, Carbon dioxide capture by adsorption, J. Chem. Tech. Matall., 51, 609
- Abraham, 1982, Coal-Oxygen process provides CO2 for enhanced recovery, Oil Gas J., 80, 68
- Shimomura, 2003, The CO2 wheel: A revolutionary approach to carbon dioxide capture, Modern Power Syst., 23, 15
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126
Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Dziejarski, B., Krzyżyńska, R., & Andersson, K. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127776 · Cited by 708
Advancements in CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption: A comprehensive review
Soo, X. Y. D., Lee, J. J. C., Wu, W., Tao, L., Wang, C., Zhu, Q., & Bu, J. (2024) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102727 · Cited by 547
A comprehensive review on hydrogen production from coal gasification: Challenges and Opportunities
Mi̇di̇lli̇, A., Küçük, H., Topal, M. E., Akbulut, U., & Dinçer, İ. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.088 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- Sifat, N. S., & Haseli, Y.
- Affiliations
- Central Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haseli, Yousef
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-10-30
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4143
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982685382
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Central Michigan University (0000)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, carbon capture and storage, thermal power plants, oxy-fuel combustion, chemical looping combustion, post-combustion CO2 capture, pre-combustion capture, CO2 separation, fossil fuel power generation, CO2 emission reduction, clean power generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
