Cited by 12Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

New Insights for the Future Design of Composites Composed of Hydrochar and Zeolite for Developing Advanced Biofuels from Cranberry Pomace

Open access
Norouzi, Omid, Heidari, Mohammad, M. Martinez, Mario, Dutta, Animesh·2020·Energies

Abstract

This study provides fundamental insight and offers a promising catalytic hydrothermal method to harness cranberry pomace as a potential bioenergy and/or hydrochar source. The physical and chemical properties of Canadian cranberry pomace, supplied by Fruit d’Or Inc., were examined and the optimum operational conditions, in terms of biocrude yield, were obtained by the I-optimal matrix of Design Expert 11. Afterward, cranberry pomace hydrochar (CPH) and zeolite were separately introduced to the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) process to investigate the benefits and disadvantages associated with their catalytic activity. CPH was found to be a better host than zeolite to accommodate cellulosic sugars and showed great catalytic performance in producing hydrocarbons. However, high amounts of corrosive amino and aliphatic acids hinder the practical application of CPH as a catalyst. Alternatively, zeolite, as a commercial high surface area catalyst, had a higher activity for deoxygenation of compounds containing carbonyl, carboxyl, and hydroxyl groups than CPH and resulted in higher selectivity of phenols. Due to the low hydrothermal structural stability, coke formation, and narrow pore size distribution, further activations and modifications are needed to improve the catalytic behavior of zeolite. Our results suggest that a composite composed of CPH and zeolite can resolve the abovementioned limitations and help with the development and commercialization of advanced biofuels from cranberry pomace.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en13246600

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Norouzi et al. (2020) developed cranberry pomace-derived composite for deoxygenation; CPH and zeolite composite via HTL; CPH was more active relative to zeolite in conversion of cellulosic sugars into hydrocarbons.

    “Further, Norouzi et al. (2020) developed a cranberry pomace-derived composite for deoxygenation reactions [102].Cranberry pomace hydrochar (CPH) and zeolite were introduced to make a composite via the hydrothermal liquefaction technique.Experimental outcomes revealed that cranberry pomace hydrochar was found to be more active relative to zeolite in the conversion of cellulosic sugars into”

    From Hydrochar: A Review on Its Production Technologies and Applications (2021) · cites this paper as [102]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Presence of corrosive amino and aliphatic acids hindered CPH catalytic activity; addition of zeolite would overcome these challenges.

    “However, the presence of the corrosive amino and aliphatic acids hindered the CPH catalytic activity; nevertheless, the addition of zeolite would overcome these challenges.”

    From Hydrochar: A Review on Its Production Technologies and Applications (2021) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Abstract and §3.4 say corrosive amino and aliphatic acids hinder the practical application of CPH alone as a catalyst, not its catalytic activity. The Abstract suggests that a CPH–zeolite composite could resolve the limitations, but §4 calls its catalytic effect a hypothesis; the paper does not establish that adding zeolite overcomes them. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norouzi, O., Heidari, M., M. Martinez, M., & Dutta, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • iFOOD Multidisciplinary Center, Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Corresponding author
Dutta, Animesh
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
13
Issue
24
Pages
6600
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111529004
Cited by
12
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (HQP2019-1592)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
cranberry pomace, hydrochar, zeolites, hydrothermal liquefaction, catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction, biofuels, biocrude, deoxygenation, coke formation, zeolite activation, fruit by-products, advanced biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review