Cited by 51Algal biology and biofuel productionInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics SystemsGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control

Perspective Design of Algae Photobioreactor for Greenhouses-A Comparative Study

Open access
Sukačová, Kateřina, Lošák, Pavel, Brummer, Vladimír, Máša, Vítězslav, Vícha, Daniel, Zavřel, Tomáš·2021·Energies

Abstract

The continued growth and evolving lifestyles of the human population require the urgent development of sustainable production in all its aspects. Microalgae have the potential of the sustainable production of various commodities; however, the energetic requirements of algae cultivation still largely contribute to the overall negative balance of many operation plants. Here, we evaluate energetic efficiency of biomass and lipids production by Chlorella pyrenoidosa in multi-tubular, helical-tubular, and flat-panel airlift pilot scale photobioreactors, placed in an indoor environment of greenhouse laboratory in Central Europe. Our results show that the main energy consumption was related to the maintenance of constant light intensity in the flat-panel photobioreactor and the culture circulation in the helical-tubular photobioreactor. The specific power input ranged between 0.79 W L−1 in the multi-tubular photobioreactor and 6.8 W L−1 in the flat-panel photobioreactor. The construction of multi-tubular photobioreactor allowed for the lowest energy requirements but also predetermined the highest temperature sensitivity and led to a significant reduction of Chlorella productivity in extraordinary warm summers 2018 and 2019. To meet the requirements of sustainable yearlong microalgal production in the context of global change, further development towards hybrid microalgal cultivation systems, combining the advantages of open and closed systems, can be expected.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en14051338

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The microalgae growth medium is a mix of tap water plus minerals, typically based on nitrate, using a modified GB-11 medium with 0.0382 g/l of nitrate.

    “Medium is used as a mix of tap (fresh)water plus minerals added, typicaly based on Nitrate a modified GB-11 medium is used with 0.0382g/l of Nitrate (Sukacova, 2021).”

    From Control system architecture for novel experimental microalgae photobioreactor Simbios (2022) · cites this paper as Sukacova, 2021

    Section 3.1 (page unavailable) says C. pyrenoidosa was grown in full BG-11 medium in 2018 and BG-11 with tenfold-reduced nitrogen in 2019. That supports use of a modified BG-11 medium, but our copy does not establish that it was made with tap water and added minerals or contained 0.0382 g/L nitrate; searches for those details found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Brennan, L.; Owende, P. Biofuels from microalgae-A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 557-577. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adarme-Vega, T.C.; Thomas-Hall, S.R.; Schenk, P.M. Towards sustainable sources for omega-3 fatty acids production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 14-18. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sathasivam, R.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F. Microalgae metabolites: A rich source for food and medicine. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 709-722. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gouveia, L.; Oliveira, A.C. Microalgae as a raw material for biofuels production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 269-274. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Richmond, A.; Hu, E.Q. Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2013.
  6. Yadav, G.; Dash, S.K.; Sen, R. A biorefinery for valorization of industrial waste-water and flue gas by microalgae for waste mitigation, carbon-dioxide sequestration and algal biomass production. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 688, 129-135. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Garcia, R.; Figueiredo, F.; Brandão, M.; Hegg, M.; Castanheira, É.; Malça, J.; Nilsson, A.; Freire, F. A meta-analysis of the life cycle greenhouse gas balances of microalgae biodiesel. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25, 1737-1748. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Kokkinos, N.; Lazaridou, A.; Stamatis, N.; Orfanidis, S.; Mitropoulos, A.C.; Christoforidis, A.; Nikolaou, N. Biodiesel production from selected microalgae strains and determination of its properties and combustion specific characteristics. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2015, 8, 1-6. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Sukačová, K.; Kočí, R.; Žídková, M.; Vítěz, T.; Trtílek, M. Novel insight into the process of nutrients removal using an algal biofilm: The evaluation of mechanism and efficiency. Int. J. Phytoremed. 2017, 19, 909-914. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  10. Chen, J.Z.; Wang, S.; Zhou, B.; Dai, L.; Liu, D.; Du, W. A robust process for lipase-mediated biodiesel production from microalgae lipid. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48515-48522. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Zhang, Y.-T.; Jiang, J.-Y.; Shi, T.-Q.; Sun, X.-M.; Zhao, Q.-Y.; Huang, H.; Ren, L.-J. Application of the CRISPR/Cas system for genome editing in microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 3239-3248. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Chisti, Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 294-306. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  13. Schade, S.; Meier, T. A comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of cultivating microalgae in different production systems and climatic zones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Algal Res. 2019, 40, 101485. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Pawar, S.B. Process Engineering Aspects of Vertical Column Photobioreactors for Mass Production of Microalgae. ChemBioEng Rev. 2016, 3, 101-115. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Acién Fernández, F.G.; Fernández Sevilla, J.M.; Molina Grima, E. Photobioreactors for the production of microalgae. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 131-151. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Itoiz, E.S.; Fuentes-Grünewald, C.; Gasol, C.M.; Garcés, E.; Alacid, E.; Rossi, S.; Rieradevall, J. Energy balance and Environmental impact analysis of microalgal biomass production for biodieselgeneration in a photobioreactor pilot plant. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 39, 324-335. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Raes, E.J.; Isdepsky, A.; Muylert, K.; Borowitzka, M.A.; Moheimani, N.R. Comparison of growth of Tetraselmis in a tubular photobioreactor (Biocoil) and a raceway pond. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 247-255. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Holdmann, C.; Schmid-Staiger, U.; Hirth, T. Outdoor microalgae cultivation at different biomass concentrations-Assesment of different daily and seasonal light scenarios by modeling. Algal Res. 2019, 38, 101405. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Pegallapati, A.K.; Arudchelvam, Y.; Nirmalakhandan, N. Energetic performance of photobioreactors for algal cultivation. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2014, 1, 2-7. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Endres, C.H.; Roth, A.; Brück, T.B. Modeling Microalgae Productivity in Industrial-Scale Vertical Flat Panel Phototbioreactors. Environ. Sci Technol. 2018, 52, 5490-5498. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Wolf, J.; Stephens, E.; Steinbusch, S.; Yarnold, J.; Ross, I.L.; Steinweg, C.; Doebbe, A.; Krolovitsch, C.; Müller, S.; Jakob, G.; et al. Multifactorial comparison of photobioreactor geometries in parallel microalgae cultivations. Algal Res. 2016, 15, 187-201. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  22. Stanier, R.Y.; Kunisawa, R.; Mandel, M.; Cohen-Bazire, G. Purification and properties of unicellular blue-green algae (Order Chroococcales). Bacteriol. Rev. 1971, 35, 171-205. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Sukačová, K.; Búzová, D.; Červený, J. Biphasic optimization approach for maximization of lipid production by the microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 901-908. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  24. Sukačová, K.; Búzová, D.; Trávníček, P.; Červený, J.; Vítězová, M.; Vítěz, T. Optimization of microalgal growth and cultivation parameters for increasing bioenergy potential: Case study using the oleaginous microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa Chick (IPPAS C2). Algal Res. 2019, 40, 101519. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane Stanley, G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497-509. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  26. Platt, T.; Gallegos, C.L.; Harrison, W.G. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton. J. Mar. Res. 1980, 38, 687-701.
  27. Friedl, A.; Padouvas, E.; Rotter, H.; Varmuza, K. Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental composition. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 544, 191-198. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  28. de Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V. Carbon dioxide fixation by Chlorella kessleri, C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus obliquus and Spirulina sp. cultivated in flasks and vertical tubular photobioreactors. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 1349-1352. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  29. Huang, J.; Ying, J.; Fan, F.; Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Li, Y. Development of a novel multi-column airlift photobioreactor with easy scalability by means of computational fluid dynamics simulations and experiments. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 222, 399-407. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Lam, M.K.; Lee, K.T. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris in a pilot-scale sequential-baffled column photobioreactor for biomass and biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 88, 399-410. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Ugwu, C.U.; Ogbonna, J.C.; Tanaka, H. Improvement of mass transfer characteristics and productivities of iclined tubular photobioreactors by installation of internal static mixers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 600-607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Scragg, A.H.; Illman, A.M.; Carden, A.; Shales, S.W. Growth of microalgae with increased calorific values in a tubular bioreactor. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23, 67-73. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Feng, P.; Deng, Z.; Hu, Z.; Fan, L. Lipid accumulation and growth of Chlorella zofingienis in flat plate photobioreactors outdoors. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 10577-10584. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Degen, J.; Uebele, A.; Retze, A.; Schmid-Staiger, U.; Walter, T. A novel airlift photobioreactor with baffles for improved light utilization through the flashing light effect. J. Biotechnol. 2001, 92, 89-94. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  35. Zhang, Q.H.; Wu, X.; Xue, S.Z.; Wang, Z.H.; Yan, C.H.; Cong, W. Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Microalgae Cultivation in a Novel Flat-Plate Photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 127-134. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Martinez-Guerra, E.; Gude, V.G. Energy aspects of microalgal biodiesel production. AIMS Energy 2016, 4, 347-362. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Ördög, V.; Stirk, W.A.; Bálint, P.; Aremu, A.O.; Okem, A.; Lóvázs, C.; Molnár, Z.; van Staden, J. Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on lipid productivity and fatty acid composition in three Chlorella strains. Algal Res. 2016, 16, 141-149. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Kakarla, R.; Choi, J.W.; Yun, J.H.; Kim, B.H.; Heo, J.; Lee, S.; Cho, D.H.; Ramanam, R.; Kim, H.S. Application of high-salinity stress for enhancing the lipid productivity of Chlorella sorokiniana HS1 in a two-phase process. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 56-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  39. He, Q.; Yang, H.; Wu, L.; Hu, C. Effect of light intensity on physiological changes, carbon allocation and neutral lipid accumulation in oleaginous microalgae. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 191, 219-228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  40. Yeh, K.L.; Chang, J.S. Nitrogen starvation strategies and photobioreactor design for enhancing lipid content and lipid production of a newly isolated microalgae Chlorella vulgaris ESP-31: Implication of biofuel. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6, 1358-1366. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Piligaev, A.V.; Sorokina, K.N.; Samoylova, Y.V.; Parmon, V.N. Lipid production by microalga Micractinium sp. IC-76 in a flat panel photobioreactor and its transesterification with cross-linked enzyme aggregates of Burkholderia cepacia lipase. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 156, 1-9. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Sarayloo, E.; Simsek, S.; Unlu, Y.S.; Cevahir, G.; Erkey, C.; Kavakli, I.H. Enhancement of the lipid productivity and fatty acid methyl ester profile of Chlorella vulgaris by two rounds mutagenesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 764-769. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Khichi, S.S.; Anis, A.; Ghosh, S. Mathematical modeling of light energy flux balance in flat panel photobioreactor for Botryococcus braunii growth, CO 2 biofixation and lipid production under varying light regimes. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 134, 44-56. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Slade, R.; Bauen, A. Micro-algae cultivation for biofuels: Cost, energy balance, environmental impacts and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 53, 29-38. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  45. Nwoba, E.G.; Parlevliet, D.A.; Laird, D.W.; Alameh, K.; Moheimani, N.R. Pilot-scale self-cooling microalgal closed photobioreactor for biomass production and electricity generation. Algal Res. 2020, 45, 1-11. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Tripathy, A.; Tripathi, D.K.; Chauhan, D.K.; Kumar, N. Paradigms of climate change impacts on some major food sources of the worls: A review on current knowledge and future prospects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 216, 356-373. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Barati, B.; Lim, P.E.; Gan, S.Y.; Poong, S.W.; Phang, S.M.; Beardall, J. Effect of elevated temperature on the physiological responses of marine Chlorella strains from different latitudes. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1-13. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sukačová, K., Lošák, P., Brummer, V., Máša, V., Vícha, D., & Zavřel, T.
Affiliations
  • Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ)
  • Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Corresponding author
Sukačová, Kateřina
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
1338
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135770515
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008413)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, photobioreactor design, Chlorella pyrenoidosa, greenhouse cultivation, energy efficiency, specific power input, flat panel photobioreactor, microalgal lipid production, temperature sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review