Cited by 19Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationWind and Air Flow StudiesAdsorption and Cooling Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ventilative Cooling in a School Building: Evaluation of the Measured Performances

Open access

Abstract

The test lecture rooms on Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven) Ghent Technology Campus (Belgium) are a demonstration case of Annex 62: Ventilative Cooling of the International Energy Agency’s Energy in Buildings and Communities programme (IEA EBC). The building is cooled by natural night ventilation and indirect evaporative cooling (IEC). Thermal comfort and the performances of ventilative cooling are evaluated. Long-term measurements of internal temperatures, occupancy, opening of windows and IEC were carried out in the cooling season of 2017. The airflow rates through the windows in cross- and single-sided ventilation mode were measured by both tracer gas concentration decay and air velocity measurements. In addition, the air flow pattern is visualized by measuring air temperatures in the room. The results show that good thermal summer comfort was measured except during heat waves and/or periods with high occupancy. Both nighttime ventilation and IEC operate very well. IEC can lower the supply temperature by day significantly compared to the outdoor temperature. The Air Changes Rates (ACR) of the night ventilation greatly depends on wind direction and velocity. The air temperature profile showed that the air is cooled down in the whole lecture but more in the upper zone. The extensive data monitoring system was important to detect malfunctions and to optimize the whole building performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fluids3040068

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low-energy cooling strategies that work well today might not remain effective under long-term climate change, or in extreme events such as a heatwave or a power failure.

    “This is supported by the findings of several studies [11,12,13], which show that the low-energy cooling strategies that work well today might not remain effective under long-term climate change, or in extreme events such as a heatwave or a power failure.”

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kolokotroni, M., and Heiselberg, P. (2015). Ventilative Cooling: State-of-the-Art Review, Aalborg University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Breesch, H., Merema, B., & Versele, A.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Breesch, Hilde
Venue
Fluids
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-09-23
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
68
ISSN
2311-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894133048
Cited by
19
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fluids (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
ventilative cooling, indirect evaporative cooling, thermal comfort, lecture rooms, air velocity measurement, atmospheric temperature profiles, wind speed and direction, building energy performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review