The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Pathogens in Poultry Meat: A Meta-Analysis of European Published Surveys
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to investigate and summarize the levels of incidence of Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Campylobacter spp. in poultry meat commercialized in Europe. After systematic review, incidence data and study characteristics were extracted from 78 studies conducted in 21 European countries. Pooled prevalence values from 203 extracted observations were estimated from random-effects meta-analysis models adjusted by pathogen, poultry type, sampling stage, cold preservation type, meat cutting type and packaging status. The results suggest that S. aureus is the main pathogen detected in poultry meat (38.5%; 95% CI: 25.4–53.4), followed by Campylobacter spp. (33.3%; 95% CI: 22.3–46.4%), while L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. present lower prevalence (19.3%; 95% CI: 14.4–25.3% and 7.10%; 95% CI: 4.60–10.8%, respectively). Despite the differences in prevalence, all pathogens were found in chicken and other poultry meats, at both end-processing step and retail level, in packed and unpacked products and in several meat cutting types. Prevalence data on cold preservation products also revealed that chilling and freezing can reduce the proliferation of pathogens but might not be able to inactivate them. The results of this meta-analysis highlight that further risk management strategies are needed to reduce pathogen incidence in poultry meat throughout the entire food chain across Europe, in particular for S. aureus and Campylobacter spp.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures



Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chicken ingredients might be considered likely sources of Campylobacter given the well‐documented high prevalence of carcass contamination (Suzuki & Yamamoto 2009, Gonçalves‐Tenório et al. 2018)”
From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Gonçalves‐Tenório et al. 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: characterization and outbreak investigation
Hennekinne, J., Buyser, M. D., & Dragacci, S. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00311.x · Cited by 1,010
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2017) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5077 · Cited by 889
Balaban, N., & Rasooly, A. (2000) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00377-9 · Cited by 838
Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective
Humphrey, T., O’Brien, S. J., & Madsen, M. (2007) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006 · Cited by 769
Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat
Skarp, C. P. A., Hänninen, M., & Rautelin, H. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019 · Cited by 464
Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics
Rouger, A., Tresse, O., & Zagorec, M. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030050 · Cited by 430
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in meat
Boer, E. D., Zwartkruis-Nahuis, J. T. M., Wit, B., Huijsdens, X. W., de Neeling, A. J., Bosch, T., van Oosterom, R. A. A., Vila, A., & Heuvelink, A. (2008) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.007 · Cited by 407
Jorgensen, F., Bailey, R. A., Williams, S., Henderson, P., Wareing, D. R. A., Bolton, F. J., Frost, J. A., Lr, W., & Humphrey, T. J. (2002) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00027-2 · Cited by 323
Occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh and processed foods in Navarra (Spain)
Vitas, A. I., & Aguado, V. (2003) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00314-3 · Cited by 261
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hocking, A.D. (2003). Chapter 12: Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal enterotoxins. Foodborne Microorganisms of Public Health Significance, Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology (NSW Branch). [6th ed.].
- Mbata, 2017, Poultry meat pathogens and its Control, Int. J. Food Saf., 7, 20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards.
Davies, R. H., Lawes, J. R., & Wales, A. D. (2019) · Journal of Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1111/jsap.13000 · Cited by 195
İnci̇li̇, G. K., Karatepe, P., Akgöl, M., Güngören, A., Koluman, A., Ilhak, O. İ., Kanmaz, H., Kaya, B., & Hayaloğlu, A. A. (2022) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2022.104001 · Cited by 131
The changing microbiome of poultry meat; from farm to fridge
Marmion, M., Ferone, M., Whyte, P., & Scannell, A. G. M. (2021) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2021.103823 · Cited by 136
Gilbert, W., Thomas, L. F., Coyne, L., & Rushton, J. (2020) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2020.100123 · Cited by 115
Yang, X., Huang, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Chen, L., Xiao, C., Zeng, H., Wei, X., Gu, Q., Li, Y., et al. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136385 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonçalves-Tenório, A., Silva, B., Rodrigues, V., Cadavez, V., & Gonzales-Barron, U.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
- CIMO Mountain Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5301-855 Bragança, Portugal
- Venue
- Foods
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-05-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 69
- ISSN
- 2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5977089
- OpenAlex
- W2800674284
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (IF/00570)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Keywords
- poultry meat, foodborne pathogens, prevalence, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter, retail meat, cold preservation, chilling, freezing, meat packaging, food safety risk management, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Pathogens in Poultry Meat: A Meta-Analysis of European Published Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/foods7050069
- The paper
- Gonçalves-Tenório, A., Silva, B., Rodrigues, V., Cadavez, V., & Gonzales-Barron, U. (2018). Prevalence of Pathogens in Poultry Meat: A Meta-Analysis of European Published Surveys. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7050069