Cited by 0Transportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility Innovationstransportation and logistics systems

Narrowing the Rail–Bus Satisfaction Gap Through Real-Time Passenger Information

Open access
Romero, Carlos, Zamorano, Clara, Monzon, Andres·2026·Future Transportation

Abstract

In metropolitan areas, rail services are inherently perceived as more attractive than buses, a well-documented phenomenon known as the ‘psychological rail factor’. This paper examines whether the use of real-time information (RTI) relates to the satisfaction gap between metropolitan bus and suburban rail services in Madrid Region, drawing on two mode-specific surveys. We compare travel behavior, information source adoption, and service satisfaction across user groups defined by their information habits. Among online RTI users, the rail–bus satisfaction gap narrows from 0.53 to 0.30 points; this reduction is not significant at the 95% level, though the 90% interval comes close to excluding zero, suggesting a genuine effect. Confounder-adjusted models confirm the narrowing is driven by a significant decline in rail satisfaction among online users (b = −0.399, p < 0.001), not by improvement among bus users, whose association remains null. These results suggest official information quality, rather than mere availability, may shape rail satisfaction. Each mode also shows distinct information needs within the metropolitan transport network; tailoring information accordingly, and ensuring its quality, is critical to sustaining public transport attractiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/futuretransp6050220

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Henry, L., and Litman, T. (2006, January 9–11). Evaluating New Start Transit Program Performance: Comparing Rail and Bus. Presented at the Joint International Light Rail Conference, St. Louis, MO, USA. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/782972.
  2. Bunschoten, T., Molin, E., and Van Nes, R. (2013). Tram or Bus; Does the Tram Bonus Exist?. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference 2013, Association for European Transport.
  3. Kano, 1984, Attractive quality and must-be quality, Hinshitsu J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control, 14, 147

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Romero, C., Zamorano, C., & Monzon, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • Department of Transport Engineering, Regional and Urban Planning, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Transport Research Center (TRANSyT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Corresponding author
Romero, Carlos
Venue
Future Transportation
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-10-01
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
220
ISSN
2673-7590 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7215066240
Cited by
0
References
58
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Transportation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
Keywords
real-time passenger information, public transport satisfaction, information quality, travel behavior, suburban rail, public transport attractiveness, Comunidad de Madrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review