CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 507Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Programming Pluripotent Precursor Cells Derived from Xenopus Embryos to Generate Specific Tissues and Organs

Open access
Borchers, Annette, Pieler, Tomas·2010·Genes
DOI 10.3390/genes1030413PMC PMC3966229
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Xenopus embryos provide a rich source of pluripotent cells that can be differentiated into functional organs. Since the molecular principles of vertebrate organogenesis appear to be conserved between Xenopus and mammals, this system can provide useful guidelines for the directional manipulation of human embryonic stem cells. Pluripotent Xenopus cells can be easily isolated from the animal pole of blastula stage Xenopus embryos. These so called “animal cap” cells represent prospective ectodermal cells, but give rise to endodermal, mesodermal and neuro-ectodermal derivatives if treated with the appropriate factors. These factors include evolutionary conserved modulators of the key developmental signal transduction pathways that can be supplied either by mRNA microinjection or direct application of recombinant proteins. This relatively simple system has added to our understanding of pancreas, liver, kidney, eye and heart development. In particular, recent studies have used animal cap cells to generate ectopic eyes and hearts, setting the stage for future work aimed at programming pluripotent cells for regenerative medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes1030413

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Induction of pancreas marker expression from pluripotent ACC. (A) ACC were induced either by injecting one-cell stage embryos with mRNAs coding for VegT, ß-catenin or noggin (top panel), or by incubating dissected ACC in retinoic acid (RA) (middle panel), or a combination of both (bottom panel). ACC were dissected at blastula stage and RA treatment was performed at late gastrula stage. Treated ACC were cultured until the equivalent of tadpole stages, when pancreatic marker expression was analyzed by RT-PCR and whole mount in situ hybridization; (B) RA induces pancreatic marker expression in ACC injected with VegT and ß-catenin mRNA. Additional injection of noggin mRNA leads to an increase in pancreatic marker expression. RT-PCR analysis of pancreas, liver and intestine marker gene expression of ACC treated as described in (A) (figure modified from [15]); CE, control embryo; CC, control ACC; (C) Increasing concentrations of RA (8, 16 or 32 µM) expand pancreatic marker expression in ACC injected with VegT, ß-catenin and noggin mRNA. XPDIp (red, marks exocrine pancreas) and insulin (blue, marks endocrine pancreas) expression was analyzed by whole mount in situ hybridization.
Figure 1 Induction of pancreas marker expression from pluripotent ACC. (A) ACC were induced either by injecting one-cell stage embryos with mRNAs coding for VegT, ß-catenin or noggin (top panel), or by incubating dissected ACC in retinoic acid (RA) (middle panel), or a combination of both (bottom panel). ACC were dissected at blastula stage and RA treatment was performed at late gastrula stage. Treated ACC were cultured until the equivalent of tadpole stages, when pancreatic marker expression was analyzed by RT-PCR and whole mount in situ hybridization; (B) RA induces pancreatic marker expression in ACC injected with VegT and ß-catenin mRNA. Additional injection of noggin mRNA leads to an increase in pancreatic marker expression. RT-PCR analysis of pancreas, liver and intestine marker gene expression of ACC treated as described in (A) (figure modified from [15]); CE, control embryo; CC, control ACC; (C) Increasing concentrations of RA (8, 16 or 32 µM) expand pancreatic marker expression in ACC injected with VegT, ß-catenin and noggin mRNA. XPDIp (red, marks exocrine pancreas) and insulin (blue, marks endocrine pancreas) expression was analyzed by whole mount in situ hybridization.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Generation of ectopic hearts by transplantation of in vitro induced ACC. (A) ACC were dissected at the blastula stage and dissociated by culturing in calcium-free medium. Dissociated cells were reaggregated by incubation in a saline solution containing calcium and activin. A fragment of the reassociated ACC was transplanted into the posterior abdomen of a neurula stage host embryo and developed to an ectopic beating heart at tadpole stage; (B) Tadpole embryo with a beating ectopic heart (white arrow); (C) Young frog displaying an ectopic in vitro induced heart. The ectopic heart is situated in the left abdomen and is filled with red blood cells (white arrow); (D) Internal anatomy of a one-year old frog with an ectopic heart (h) adjacent to the host's intestine. The blood flow from the host’s mesenteric artery (black arrow) to the anterior abdominal vein (white arrow) via the ectopic heart is indicated. (B–D) were reproduced from [37] with permission from The International Journal of Developmental Biology (Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003, 47, 405–410). Scale bars: (B) 1 mm, (D) 5 mm.
Figure 2 Generation of ectopic hearts by transplantation of in vitro induced ACC. (A) ACC were dissected at the blastula stage and dissociated by culturing in calcium-free medium. Dissociated cells were reaggregated by incubation in a saline solution containing calcium and activin. A fragment of the reassociated ACC was transplanted into the posterior abdomen of a neurula stage host embryo and developed to an ectopic beating heart at tadpole stage; (B) Tadpole embryo with a beating ectopic heart (white arrow); (C) Young frog displaying an ectopic in vitro induced heart. The ectopic heart is situated in the left abdomen and is filled with red blood cells (white arrow); (D) Internal anatomy of a one-year old frog with an ectopic heart (h) adjacent to the host's intestine. The blood flow from the host’s mesenteric artery (black arrow) to the anterior abdominal vein (white arrow) via the ectopic heart is indicated. (B–D) were reproduced from [37] with permission from The International Journal of Developmental Biology (Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003, 47, 405–410). Scale bars: (B) 1 mm, (D) 5 mm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 In vitro induction of functional eyes from ACC. (A) ACC were dissected from blastula stage transgenic embryos constitutively expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). When transplanted into the flanks of neurula stage embryos, these ACC developed into sheets of epidermis; (B) In contrast, ACC injected with mRNA coding for a set of seven different transcription factors, collectively called the eye field transcription factors (EFTF), generated ectopic eyes after transplantation; (C) Tadpole embryo with ectopic EFTF/YFP-expressing eye in close proximity to the gut (indicated by dashed lines). Inlay shows a magnification of the ectopic eye; (D) In situ hybridization showing the expression of the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) marker, hermes, in a section of the ectopic eye. Outer nuclear (ONL), inner nuclear (INL) and ganglion cell layers (GCL) are indicated; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; (E) Half of an animal cap from an uninjected transgenic embryo is not sufficient to generate an eye, if it is used to replace portions of the eye field; (F) In contrast, half of an animal cap expressing EFTF is able to replace the eye field and generate a functional eye. Control ACC expressing YFP only form epidermis (G), while EFTF-expressing ACC generate an eye (H); Insert in (H) shows a higher magnification of the eye. Sections of the control (I) and induced eye (J) of the same tadpole embryo. YFP fluorescence indicates that the eye originates from donor tissue. Figures (C,D and G–J) were reproduced from a PLoS Biology article by Viczian et al. [42]. Scale bar: (D) 12 µm.
Figure 3 In vitro induction of functional eyes from ACC. (A) ACC were dissected from blastula stage transgenic embryos constitutively expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). When transplanted into the flanks of neurula stage embryos, these ACC developed into sheets of epidermis; (B) In contrast, ACC injected with mRNA coding for a set of seven different transcription factors, collectively called the eye field transcription factors (EFTF), generated ectopic eyes after transplantation; (C) Tadpole embryo with ectopic EFTF/YFP-expressing eye in close proximity to the gut (indicated by dashed lines). Inlay shows a magnification of the ectopic eye; (D) In situ hybridization showing the expression of the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) marker, hermes, in a section of the ectopic eye. Outer nuclear (ONL), inner nuclear (INL) and ganglion cell layers (GCL) are indicated; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; (E) Half of an animal cap from an uninjected transgenic embryo is not sufficient to generate an eye, if it is used to replace portions of the eye field; (F) In contrast, half of an animal cap expressing EFTF is able to replace the eye field and generate a functional eye. Control ACC expressing YFP only form epidermis (G), while EFTF-expressing ACC generate an eye (H); Insert in (H) shows a higher magnification of the eye. Sections of the control (I) and induced eye (J) of the same tadpole embryo. YFP fluorescence indicates that the eye originates from donor tissue. Figures (C,D and G–J) were reproduced from a PLoS Biology article by Viczian et al. [42]. Scale bar: (D) 12 µm.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 507

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borchers, A., & Pieler, T.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Borchers, Annette
ORCID
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-11-18
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
413-426
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/genes1030413
PMC
PMC3966229
OpenAlex
W2126635564
Cited by
506
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
Xenopus embryo, organogenesis, pancreatic development, liver development, kidney development, human embryonic stem cells, regenerative medicine, mRNA microinjection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review