Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Polymorphism of 27 Y-STR Loci in the Western Kazakh Tribes from Kazakhstan and Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan

Ashirbekov, Yeldar, Sabitov, Zhaxylyk, Aidarov, Baglan, Abaildayev, Arman, Junissova, Zukhra, Cherusheva, Alena, Saidamarova, Viktoriya V., Sharipov, Kamalidin, Ramankulov, Yerlan, Zhabagin, Maxat·2022·Genes
DOI 10.3390/genes13101826PMC PMC9601638
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Data on the genetic polymorphism of 27 Y-STR in Kazakhs of the Junior Zhuz has been presented and analyzed in relation to forensic features. A total of 464 representatives of the Western Kazakh tribes of Kazakhstan (Western Kazakhs, n = 405) and Uzbekistan (Karakalpakstan Kazakhs, n = 59) were examined by the Yfiler Plus set. The data are available in the YHRD under accession numbers YA006010 and YA006009. Genetic analysis (AMOVA and MDS) did not show significant differences between the two groups (Kazakhstan and Karakalpakstan Kazakhs) in terms of Y-chromosome diversity. Both groups are characterized by haplogroup C2a1a2 as a founder effect, which dominated two of the three tribes: Alimuly (67%), Baiuly (74.6%), and Zhetiru (25.8%). At the same time, the phylogenetic network for each tribe found its own clusters within C2a1a2. Western Kazakhs and Karakalpakstan Kazakhs present high values of unique haplotypes (84.44% and 96.61%), discrimination capacity (90.37% and 98.30%), and haplotype diversity (0.9991 and 0.9994). A set of 27 Y-STR loci distinguishes closely related individuals within the Western Kazakh tribes quite well. It is suitable for forensic application, and is also optimal for population genetics studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes13101826

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 MDS plot based on RST genetic distances between our samples and the neighboring populations based on 23 Y-STRs (stress = 0.074).
Figure 1 MDS plot based on RST genetic distances between our samples and the neighboring populations based on 23 Y-STRs (stress = 0.074).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Phylogenetic Network of Western Kazakhs belonging to the C2a1a2–M48 haplogroup based in 23 Y-STRs. (A) Geographical affiliation. (B) Tribal affiliation.
Figure 2 Phylogenetic Network of Western Kazakhs belonging to the C2a1a2–M48 haplogroup based in 23 Y-STRs. (A) Geographical affiliation. (B) Tribal affiliation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Roewer, 2019, Y-chromosome short tandem repeats in forensics–Sexing, profiling, and matching male DNA. Wiley Interdiscip, Rev. Forensic Sci., 1, e1336
  2. Willuweit, 2015, The new Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 15, 43, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.024 · DOI
  3. Roewer, 2020, DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Recommendations on the interpretation of Y-STR results in forensic analysis, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 48, 102308, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102308 · DOI
  4. Pamjav, 2015, Testing Central and Inner Asian admixture among contemporary Hungarians, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 15, 121, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.007 · DOI
  5. Zhabagin, 2019, Development of the Kazakhstan Y-chromosome haplotype reference database: Analysis of 27 Y-STR in Kazakh population, Int. J. Legal. Med., 133, 1029, 10.1007/s00414-018-1859-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ashirbekov, 2022, Genetic polymorphism of 27 Y-STR loci in Kazakh populations from Northern Kazakhstan, Ann. Hum. Biol., 49, 87, 10.1080/03014460.2022.2039292 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chaix, 2004, The genetic or mythical ancestry of descent groups: Lessons from the Y chromosome, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 75, 1113, 10.1086/425938 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Khussainova, 2022, Genetic Relationship Among the Kazakh People Based on Y-STR Markers Reveals Evidence of Genetic Variation Among Tribes and Zhuz, Front Genet., 12, 801295, 10.3389/fgene.2021.801295 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ralf, 2020, Identification and characterization of novel rapidly mutating Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat markers, Hum. Mutat., 41, 1680, 10.1002/humu.24068 · DOI
  10. Excoffier, 2010, Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 10, 564, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x · DOI
  11. Gouy, 2017, STRAF-A convenient online tool for STR data evaluation in forensic genetics, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 30, 148, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.007 · DOI
  12. Bandelt, 1995, Mitochondrial portraits of human populations using median networks, Genetics, 141, 743, 10.1093/genetics/141.2.743 · DOI
  13. Muzzio, 2010, Technical note: A method for assignment of the weight of characters, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 143, 488, 10.1002/ajpa.21366 · DOI
  14. Adnan, 2021, Forensic features and genetic legacy of the Baloch population of Pakistan and the Hazara population across Durand line revealed by Y-chromosomal STRs, Int. J. Legal Med., 135, 1777, 10.1007/s00414-021-02591-2 · DOI
  15. Wang, 2019, Genetic polymorphisms of 27 Yfiler® Plus loci in the Daur and Mongolian ethnic minorities from Hulunbuir of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 40, e252, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.003 · DOI
  16. Gao, 2016, Population genetics of 23 Y-STR loci in the Mongolian minority population in Inner Mongolia of China, Int. J. Legal Med., 130, 1509, 10.1007/s00414-016-1433-1 · DOI
  17. Liu, 2020, Forensic characteristics and genetic affinity analyses of Xinjiang Mongolian group using a novel six fluorescent dye-labeled typing system including 41 Y-STRs and 3 Y-InDels, Mol. Genet. Genom. Med., 8, e1097, 10.1002/mgg3.1097 · DOI
  18. Adnan, 2019, Genetic characterization of Y-chromosomal STRs in Hazara ethnic group of Pakistan and confirmation of DYS448 null allele, Int. J. Legal Med., 133, 789, 10.1007/s00414-018-1962-x · DOI
  19. Semikhodskii, 2021, Population genetic data and forensic parameters of the 27 Y-STR panel Yfiler® Plus in Russian population, Int. J. Legal Med., 135, 1785, 10.1007/s00414-021-02599-8 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ashirbekov, Y., Sabitov, Z., Aidarov, B., Abaildayev, A., Junissova, Z., Cherusheva, A., Saidamarova, V. V., Sharipov, K., Ramankulov, Y., & Zhabagin, M.
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-10-09
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
1826
ISSN
2073-4425
DOI
10.3390/genes13101826
PMC
PMC9601638
Cited by
15
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (AP09259527, 4050/GF4, SST2019012)
  • Faculty development competitive research grants programs of Nazarbayev University (AP09259527, 4050/GF4, SST2019012)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review