The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Investigating Students’ Perceptions towards Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education
Open accessAbstract
Implementing a reform in medical education requires students' awareness regarding the importance of artificial intelligence (AI) in modern medical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate students' perceptions of AI in medical education. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June 2021 to November 2021 using an online questionnaire to collect data from medical students in the Faculty of Medicine at Kuwait University, Kuwait. The response rate for the survey was 51%, with a sample size of 352. Most students (349 (99.1%)) agreed that AI would play an important role in healthcare. More than half of the students (213 (60.5%)) understood the basic principles of AI, and (329 (93.4%)) students showed comfort with AI terminology. Many students (329 (83.5%)) believed that learning about AI would benefit their careers, and (289 (82.1%)) believed that medical students should receive AI teaching or training. The study revealed that most students had positive perceptions of AI. Undoubtedly, the role of AI in the future of medicine will be significant, and AI-based medical practice is required. There was a strong consensus that AI will not replace doctors but will drastically transform healthcare practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1814259 · Cited by 4,579
Large language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083
Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.13138 · Cited by 4,083
The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare
Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019) · Future Healthcare Journal · doi:10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94 · Cited by 3,800
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126
Sallam, M. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155 · Cited by 3,123 · cited 4×
“Moreover, ethical issues, bias, and limited knowledge are some concerns regarding ChatGPT [18].”
BackgroundInfluentialBenefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine
Lee, P., Bubeck, S., & Petro, J. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr2214184 · Cited by 1,738
Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Ophthalmology
Ting, D. S. W., Pasquale, L. R., Peng, L., Campbell, J. P., Lee, A., Raman, R., Tan, G. S. W., Schmetterer, L. F., Keane, P. A., & Wong, T. Y. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64573-1_200 · Cited by 1,660
Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology
Ting, D. S. W., Pasquale, L. R., Peng, L., Campbell, J. P., Lee, A. Y., Raman, R., Tan, G. S. W., Schmetterer, L., Keane, P. A., & Wong, T. Y. (2019) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313173 · Cited by 1,554
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Elsevier (2022, June 25). Description—Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/journals/artificial-intelligence-in-medicine/0933-3657/subscribe.
- Edward, H., Shortliffe, J.J.C., and Chiang, M.F. (2021). Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine, Springer Nature. [5th ed.].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84
Gordon, M., Daniel, M., Ajiboye, A., Uraiby, H., Xu, N. Y., Bartlett, R., Hanson, J., Haas, M., Spadafore, M., Grafton-Clarke, C., et al. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2314198 · Cited by 679
Bekbolatova, M., Mayer, J., Ong, C. W., & Toma, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12020125 · Cited by 450
Students' perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor
Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1 · Cited by 208
A Primer on Generative Artificial Intelligence
Kalota, F. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14020172 · Cited by 225
Amiri, H., Peiravi, S., rezazadeh shojaee, S. S., Rouhparvarzamin, M., Nateghi, M. N., Etemadi, M. H., ShojaeiBaghini, M., Musaie, F., Anvari, M. H., & Asadi Anar, M. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05406-1 · Cited by 149
“…including the U.S.A [18], Germany [19, 20], Lebanon [21], Pakistan [22], Canada [23], The U.K. [24], United Arab Emirates [25], Nigeria [26], Turkey [27, 28], Spain [29] Saudi Arabia [30], India [31–33], Egypt [34], Peru [35], Nepal [36], Kuwait [37], Syria [38], and multiple countries [39].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Buabbas, A. J., Miskin, B., Alnaqi, A. A., Ayed, A. K., Shehab, A. A., Syed-Abdul, S., & Uddin, M.
- Affiliations
- Kuwait University (KW)
- Ministry of Health (KW)
- Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital (KW)
- Taipei Medical University (TW)
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Buabbas, Ali Jasem
- Venue
- Healthcare
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-05-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1298
- ISSN
- 2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10178742
- OpenAlex
- W4367625612
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, medical education, medical students, student perceptions, AI literacy, artificial intelligence in healthcare, future of medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
