Cited by 25Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 181 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Healthcare 5.0-Driven Clinical Intelligence: The Learn-Predict-Monitor-Detect-Correct Framework for Systematic Artificial Intelligence Integration in Critical Care

Open access
Boussi Rahmouni, Hanene, Hassine, Nesrine Ben El Hadj, Chouchen, Mariem, Ceylan, Halil İbrahim, Muntean, Raul Ioan, Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi, Dergaa, Ismail·2025·Healthcare

Abstract

Background: Healthcare 5.0 represents a shift toward intelligent, human-centric care systems. Intensive care units generate vast amounts of data that require real-time decisions, but current decision support systems lack comprehensive frameworks for safe integration of artificial intelligence. Objective: We developed and validated the Learn–Predict–Monitor–Detect–Correct (LPMDC) framework as a methodology for systematic artificial intelligence integration across the critical care workflow. The framework improves predictive analytics, continuous patient monitoring, intelligent alerting, and therapeutic decision support while maintaining essential human clinical oversight. Methods: Framework development employed systematic theoretical modeling integrating Healthcare 5.0 principles, comprehensive literature synthesis covering 2020–2024, clinical workflow analysis across 15 international ICU sites, technology assessment of mature and emerging AI applications, and multi-round expert validation by 24 intensive care physicians and medical informaticists. Each LPMDC phase was designed with specific integration requirements, performance metrics, and safety protocols. Results: LPMDC implementation and aggregated evidence from prior studies demonstrated significant clinical improvements: 30% mortality reduction, 18% ICU length-of-stay decrease (7.5 to 6.1 days), 45% clinician cognitive load reduction, and 85% sepsis bundle compliance improvement. Machine learning algorithms achieved an 80% sensitivity for sepsis prediction three hours before clinical onset, with false-positive rates below 15%. Additional applications demonstrated effectiveness in predicting respiratory failure, preventing cardiovascular crises, and automating ventilator management. Digital twins technology enabled personalized treatment simulations, while the integration of the Internet of Medical Things provided comprehensive patient and environmental surveillance. Implementation challenges were systematically addressed through phased deployment strategies, staff training programs, and regulatory compliance frameworks. Conclusions: The Healthcare 5.0-enabled LPMDC framework provides the first comprehensive theoretical foundation for systematic AI integration in critical care while preserving human oversight and clinical safety. The cyclical five-phase architecture enables processing beyond traditional cognitive limits through continuous feedback loops and system optimization. Clinical validation demonstrates measurable improvements in patient outcomes, operational efficiency, and clinician satisfaction. Future developments incorporating quantum computing, federated learning, and explainable AI technologies offer additional advancement opportunities for next-generation critical care systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare13202553

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Overview of Healthcare 5.0 Architecture and Key Technological Components.
Figure 1 Overview of Healthcare 5.0 Architecture and Key Technological Components.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 LPMDC Framework in Healthcare 5.0: Application to Respiratory Distress Workflow.
Figure 2 LPMDC Framework in Healthcare 5.0: Application to Respiratory Distress Workflow.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Integrating LPMDC into Intelligent ICU: A Healthcare 5.0 Roadmap.
Figure 3 Integrating LPMDC into Intelligent ICU: A Healthcare 5.0 Roadmap.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 181 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Kolasa, K. (2023). The Digital Transformation of the Healthcare System: Healthcare 5.0, Taylor & Francis. · DOI
  2. Gomathi, L., Mishra, A.K., and Tyagi, A.K. (2023, January 11–13). Industry 5.0 for healthcare 5.0: Opportunities, challenges and future research possibilities. Proceedings of the 2023 7th IEEE International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tamil Nadu, India. · DOI
  3. Chase, J.G., Zhou, C., Knopp, J.L., Moeller, K., Benyo, B., Desaive, T., Wong, J.H.K., Malinen, S., Naswall, K., and Shaw, G.M. (2023). Digital Twins and Automation of Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Cyber-Physical-Human Systems: Fundamentals and Applications, IEEE.
  4. Capp, N., Fauveau, V., Au, Y., Glasser, P., Muqeem, T., Hassen, G., and Cardenas, A. (2019, January 7). Strados labs: An efficient process to acquire and characterize clinically validated respiratory system information using a non-invasive bio-sensor. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), Philadelphia, PA, USA. · DOI
  5. Garg, 2025, Chapter 9. Healthcare 5.0 opportunities and challenges: A literature review, Intelligent Biomedical Technologies and Applications for Healthcare 5.0, Volume 16, 133
  6. Said, A., Yahyaoui, A., and Abdellatif, T. (2023, January 2–4). HIPAA and GDPR compliance in IoT healthcare systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Model and Data Engineering, Sousse, Tunisia. · DOI
  7. Neubauer, R., Schröttner, J., and Baumgartner, C. (2022). Safety requirements for medical devices in compliance with European standards. Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostics: Requirements in Europe, Springer. · DOI
  8. Bertl, M., Piho, G., Draheim, D., Ross, P., Pechmann, L., Bucciarelli, N., and Sharma, R. (2023). Future Opportunities for Systematic AI Support in Healthcare. International Conference on Bridging the Gap Between AI and Reality, Springer Nature. · DOI
  9. Pundkar, 2025, Transforming emergency medicine with artificial intelligence: From triage to clinical decision support, J. Multidiscip. Rev., 8, 2025285, 10.31893/multirev.2025285 · DOI
  10. Sunday, 2025, Behavioral Impacts of AI Reliance in Diagnostics: Balancing Automation with Skill Retention, Epidemiol. Health Data Insights, 1, ehdi014, 10.63946/ehdi/17088 · DOI
  11. Hennebelle, A., Dieng, Q., Ismail, L., and Buyya, R. (2024, January 9–11). SmartEdge: Smart Healthcare End-to-End Integrated Edge and Cloud Computing System for Diabetes Prediction Enabled by Ensemble Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), Online. · DOI
  12. Baumbach, J. (2024, January 3–5). To share or not to share? Privacy-preserving AI in medicine. Proceedings of the RExPO24 Conference, Munich, Germany. · DOI
  13. Dirgová Luptáková, I., Pospíchal, J., and Huraj, L. (2023). Beyond Code and Algorithms: Navigating Ethical Complexities in Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the Computational Methods in Systems and Software, Springer Nature. · DOI
  14. Chinta, S.V., Wang, Z., Palikhe, A., Zhang, X., Kashif, A., Smith, M.A., Liu, J., and Zhang, W. (2025). AI-driven healthcare: Fairness in AI healthcare: A survey. PLOS Digit. Health, 4. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Boussi Rahmouni, H., Hassine, N. B. E. H., Chouchen, M., Ceylan, H. İ., Muntean, R. I., Bragazzi, N. L., & Dergaa, I.
Affiliations
  • Research Laboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, The Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, University of Tunis el Manar, Tunis 1006, Tunisia
  • Tunis University (TN)
  • Department of Physical Education of Sports Teaching, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Türkiye
  • 1 Decembrie 1918 University (RO)
  • York University (CA)
  • Manouba University (TN)
Corresponding author
Muntean, Raul Ioan
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-10-10
Volume
13
Issue
20
Pages
2553
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415038671
Cited by
25
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ataturk University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
Healthcare 5.0, artificial intelligence integration, intensive care unit, clinical decision support systems, sepsis prediction, early warning systems, digital twin, Internet of Medical Things, ventilator management, human oversight, AI safety, ICU length of stay, federated learning, explainable AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healthcare 5.0-Driven Clinical Intelligence: The Learn-Predict-Monitor-Detect-Correct Framework for Systematic Artificial Intelligence Integration in Critical Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/healthcare13202553
The paper
Boussi Rahmouni, H., Hassine, N. B. E. H., Chouchen, M., Ceylan, H. İ., Muntean, R. I., Bragazzi, N. L., & Dergaa, I. (2025). Healthcare 5.0-Driven Clinical Intelligence: The Learn-Predict-Monitor-Detect-Correct Framework for Systematic Artificial Intelligence Integration in Critical Care. Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202553