Cited by 238Healthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementMedical Device Sterilization and Disinfection

Review of Current Healthcare Waste Management Methods and Their Effect on Global Health

Open access
Kenny, Christina, Priyadarshini, Anushree·2021·Healthcare

Abstract

Healthcare is a rapidly growing industry as medical treatments become more sophisticated, more in demand due to increasing incidence of chronic disease and more widely available worldwide. This booming industry is also creating more waste than ever before and, as such, there is a growing need to treat and dispose of this waste. Healthcare waste (HCW) disposal includes a multitude of disposal methods, including incineration, landfilling and chemical treatments. These rudimentary methods and their growing use present their own problems that negatively impact both the environment and, in turn, damage public health, thus contributing to a global healthcare crisis. The aim of this review was to examine the current HCW disposal methods in place and the harmful effects they have on the environment and on public health. The findings accumulated in this review demonstrate a heavy reliance on basic, low tech HCW disposal techniques and uncovered the negative impacts of these methods. There is a notable lack of employment of “greener” HCW disposal methods on a largescale due to cost, access and feasibility. Despite innovations in HCW disposal, there is no scalable, global green solution at present. Further, the review highlights that global health consequences of HCW disposal methods often differ depending on how developed the country is.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare9030284

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • World population growth, increased lifetime and global crisis involve more waste production, which requires better management.

    “World population growth, increased lifetime and global crisis involve more waste production, which requires better management [4].”

    From Waste Management and the Perspective of a Green Hospital—A Systematic Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction states that population growth, longer lifespans, and a global crisis in chronic disease are producing more healthcare waste and increasing the need to manage it. The citing sentence omits the limiting context: the crisis is chronic disease, and the waste is healthcare waste, not waste generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many ecological concerns in health areas are directly linked to waste production and dumping methods.

    “Many ecological concerns in health areas are directly linked to waste production and dumping methods.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenny, C., & Priyadarshini, A.
Affiliations
Technological University Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Priyadarshini, Anushree
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-05
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
284
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135115448
Cited by
238
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 6
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Keywords
medical waste management, medical waste disposal, incineration, landfilling, environmental impact, global health disparities, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review