Cited by 128Wastewater Treatment and ReuseChild Nutrition and Water AccessUrban and Rural Development Challenges

Pit Latrine Emptying Behavior and Demand for Sanitation Services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania

Open access
Jenkins, Marion, Cumming, Oliver, Cairncross, Sandy·2015·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Pit latrines are the main form of sanitation in unplanned areas in many rapidly growing developing cities. Understanding demand for pit latrine fecal sludge management (FSM) services in these communities is important for designing demand-responsive sanitation services and policies to improve public health. We examine latrine emptying knowledge, attitudes, behavior, trends and rates of safe/unsafe emptying, and measure demand for a new hygienic latrine emptying service in unplanned communities in Dar Es Salaam (Dar), Tanzania, using data from a cross-sectional survey at 662 residential properties in 35 unplanned sub-wards across Dar, where 97% had pit latrines. A picture emerges of expensive and poor FSM service options for latrine owners, resulting in widespread fecal sludge exposure that is likely to increase unless addressed. Households delay emptying as long as possible, use full pits beyond what is safe, face high costs even for unhygienic emptying, and resort to unsafe practices like ‘flooding out’. We measured strong interest in and willingness to pay (WTP) for the new pit emptying service at 96% of residences; 57% were WTP ≥U.S. $17 to remove ≥200 L of sludge. Emerging policy recommendations for safe FSM in unplanned urban communities in Dar and elsewhere are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph120302588

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Strauss M. Heinss U. Montangero A. On-site sanitation. when the pits are full—Planning for resource protection in faecal sludge management Ver. Wasser Boden Lufthyg 2000 105 353 360 10842838
  2. [2]Strauss M. Koné D. Koanda H. Steiner M. Urban excreta management—Situation, challenges, and promising solutions Proceedings of the 1st International Faecal Sludge Management Policy Symposium and Workshop Dakar, Senegal 9–12 May 2006
  3. [4]Strande L. The global situation Fecal Sludge Management: Systems Approach for Implementation and Management Strande L. Ronteltap M. Brdjanovic D. IWA Publishing London, UK 2014 Chapter 1
  4. [7]Thye Y.P. Templeton M.R. Ali M. A critical review of technologies for pit latrine emptying in developing countries Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012 41 1793 1819 10.1080/10643389.2010.481593 · DOI
  5. [9]Jenkins M.W. Cumming O. Scott B. Cairncross S. Beyond improved towards safe and sustainable urban sanitation: Assessing the design, management and functionality of sanitation in poor communities of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania J. Water. Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2014 4 131 141 10.2166/washdev.2013.180 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [12]WaterAid Tanzania Country Programme Pit emptying service using gulper technology Proceedings of the East Africa Practitioners Workshop on Pro-Poor Urban Sanitation and Hygiene Kigali, Rwanda 29–31 March 2010
  7. [14]Victora C.G. Huttly S.R. Fuchs S.C. Olinto M.T. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: A hierarchical approach Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997 26 224 227 10.1093/ije/26.1.224 9126524 · DOI
  8. [15]Jenkins M.W. Scott B. Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana Soc. Sci. Med. 2007 64 2427 2442 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.010 17442472 · DOI
  9. [16]Sill D.A. After the pit latrine is full…What then? Effective options for pit latrine management Proceedings of the Biennial Conference of the Water Institute of Southern Africa (WISA) Durban, South Africa 19–23 May 2002
  10. [19]Starkl M. Mbatha S. Roma E. Jeffrey P. Stenström T.A. Hawksworth D. Gounden T. Evaluation of community and household based sanitation systems in Ethekwini municipality, South Africa: Lessons learned and recommendations Water Prac. Technol. 2010 5 10.2166/wpt.2010.106 · DOI
  11. [20]Dodane P.H. Mbéguéré M. Sow O. Strande L. Capital and operating costs of full-scale fecal sludge management and wastewater treatment systems in Dakar, Senegal Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012 46 3705 3711 10.1021/es2045234 22413875 PMC3317593 · DOI
  12. [21]Opel A. Bashar M.K. Inefficient technology or misperceived demand: The failure of Vacutug-based pit-emptying services in Bangladesh Waterlines 2013 32 213 220 10.3362/1756-3488.2013.022 · DOI
  13. [22]Halcrow G. Yetsho T. Nguyen N. Tshering G. Developing behaviour change communication for improving faecal sludge management in Bhutan J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2014 4 164 170 10.2166/washdev.2013.131 · DOI
  14. [23]Harder D.S. Sajise A.J.U. Galing E.M. Willingness to pay for sanitation services in Dagupan City, Philippines J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2013 3 165 180 10.2166/washdev.2013.064 · DOI
  15. [25]Bassan M. Tchonda T. Yiougo L. Zoellig H. Mahamane I. Mbéguéré M. Strande L. Characterization of faecal sludge during dry and rainy seasons in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso Proceedings of the 36th WEDC International Conference Nakuru, Kenya 1–5 July 2013
  16. [27]Sugden S. The importance of understanding the market when designing pit-emptying devices: Designing pit emptying technologies for businesses Waterlines 2013 32 200 212 10.3362/1756-3488.2013.021 · DOI
  17. [29]Tilley E. Dodane P.H. Financial transfers and responsibility in faecal sludge management chains Fecal Sludge Management: Systems Approach for Implementation and Management IWA Publishing London, UK 2014 Chapter 13
  18. [33]Mikhael G. Robbins D.M. Ramsay J.E. Mbéguérém M. Methods and means for collection and transport of faecal sludge Fecal Sludge Management: Systems Approach for Implementation and Management IWA Publishing London, UK 2014 Chapter 4
  19. [34]Koné D. Making urban excreta and wastewater management contribute to cities’ economic development: A paradigm shift Water Policy 2010 12 602 610 10.2166/wp.2010.122 · DOI
  20. [35]Diener S. Diener S. Semiyaga S. Niwagaba C.B. Muspratt A.M. Gning J.B. Mbéguéré M. Ennin J.E. Zurbrugg C. Strande L. A value proposition: Resource recovery from faecal sludge—Can it be the driver for improved sanitation? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014 88 S32 S38 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenkins, M., Cumming, O., & Cairncross, S.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Jenkins, Marion
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-02-27
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
2588-2611
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121167088
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Keywords
pit latrines, fecal sludge management, willingness to pay, Dar es Salaam
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Hygiene, Sanitation, Tanzania, Toilet Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review